Crowdsourced and crowdfunded: the future of forensic DNA?

Nathan SCUDDER, James ROBERTSON, Sally KELTY, Simon WALSH, Dennis MCNEVIN

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
178 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Forensic DNA analysis is dependent on comparing the known and the unknown. Expand the number of known profiles, and the likelihood of a successful match increases. Forensic use of DNA is moving towards comparing samples of unknown origin with publicly available genetic data, such as the records held by genetic genealogy providers. Use of forensic genetic genealogy has yielded a number of recent high-profile successes but has raised ethical and privacy concerns. Navigating family trees is complex, even more so when combined with a comparison of genetic relationships. This intelligence-gathering process has led to occasional false leads, and its use also risks a public backlash, similar to concerns over Cambridge Analytica. A cautious approach to use of this technique is therefore warranted.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)235-241
Number of pages7
JournalAustralian Journal of Forensic Sciences
Volume52
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Mar 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Crowdsourced and crowdfunded: the future of forensic DNA?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this