Cry1 resistance in a CRISPR/Cas9-mediated HaCad1 gene knockout strain of the Australian cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera conferta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Grace Fang, Bill James, Michelle Williams, Andy Bachler, Wee Tek Tay, Tom Walsh , Michael FRESE

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Helicoverpa armigera is a highly polyphagous species that causes huge losses to agricultural and horticultural crops worldwide. In the cotton industry, H. armigera, including the Australian subspecies H. armigera conferta, is largely managed by using genetically modified crops that express insecticidal toxins, such as Cry1Ac. Resistance to Cry1proteins occurs and, in some cases, is mediated by changes to HaCad1, a gene that encodes the midgut protein cadherin. Around the world, numerous resistance-associated polymorphisms have been identified in the HaCad1 gene of H. armigera, but Cry1Ac resistance is rare in the Australian subspecies. We used CRISPR/Cas9 to disrupt the cadherin gene in H. armigera conferta and characterised the resulting phenotype with bioassays and transcriptomics.
RESULTS: Compared to the parental strain, the newly generated HaCad1 knockout strain is 44-fold and 17-fold more resistant to Cry1Ac and Cry1A.105, respectively, while wild-type and knockout insects were equally resistant to Cry1F.
CONCLUSION: The disruption of the HaCad1 gene causes Cry1Ac resistance in Australian H. armigera conferta. However, Cry1Ac resistance remains rare in Australian field populations suggesting that Australia’s approach to pest management in cotton has prevented widespread Cry1Ac resistance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)959-965
Number of pages7
JournalPest Management Science
Volume81
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cry1 resistance in a CRISPR/Cas9-mediated HaCad1 gene knockout strain of the Australian cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera conferta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this