Culture-based versus risk-based screening for the prevention of group B streptococcal disease in newborns: A review of national guidelines

Caroline S E Homer, Vanessa Scarf, Christine Catling, Deborah DAVIS

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Maternal colonisation with group B streptococcus (GBS) is recognised as the most frequent cause of severe early onset infection in newborns. National and international guidelines outline two approaches to the prevention of early onset disease in the neonate: risk based management and antenatal culture-based screening. We undertook an analysis of existing national and international guidelines in relation to GBS in pregnancy using a standardised and validated instrument to highlight the different recommended approaches to care. Methods: English language guidelines on the screening and management of GBS colonisation in pregnant women and the prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal disease in newborns were sought. Results: Four guidelines met the inclusion criteria, one from the United States of America (USA), the United Kingdom (UK), Canada and New Zealand. All four were appraised as at a high standard in terms of development using the AGREE II tool. Both approaches were recommended in the guidelines with different regions of the world advocating different approaches often based on the same evidence. Guidelines from the USA recommend an antenatal culture-based approach while the UK guidelines recommend risk-based management. Conclusion: Based on an AGREE II analysis, the standard of the guidelines was high despite having disparate recommendations. Both approaches to the prevention of early onset GBS infection in neonates are recommended with the split being geographically-based.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)46-51
Number of pages6
JournalWomen and Birth
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Newborn Infant
Guidelines
Streptococcus agalactiae
Risk Management
Infection
New Zealand
Canada
Pregnant Women
Language
Mothers
Pregnancy
United Kingdom

Cite this

@article{162dff485e864841ae922a2e1e3ab972,
title = "Culture-based versus risk-based screening for the prevention of group B streptococcal disease in newborns: A review of national guidelines",
abstract = "Background: Maternal colonisation with group B streptococcus (GBS) is recognised as the most frequent cause of severe early onset infection in newborns. National and international guidelines outline two approaches to the prevention of early onset disease in the neonate: risk based management and antenatal culture-based screening. We undertook an analysis of existing national and international guidelines in relation to GBS in pregnancy using a standardised and validated instrument to highlight the different recommended approaches to care. Methods: English language guidelines on the screening and management of GBS colonisation in pregnant women and the prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal disease in newborns were sought. Results: Four guidelines met the inclusion criteria, one from the United States of America (USA), the United Kingdom (UK), Canada and New Zealand. All four were appraised as at a high standard in terms of development using the AGREE II tool. Both approaches were recommended in the guidelines with different regions of the world advocating different approaches often based on the same evidence. Guidelines from the USA recommend an antenatal culture-based approach while the UK guidelines recommend risk-based management. Conclusion: Based on an AGREE II analysis, the standard of the guidelines was high despite having disparate recommendations. Both approaches to the prevention of early onset GBS infection in neonates are recommended with the split being geographically-based.",
keywords = "Group B streptococcus, Neonatal infection, Screening, labour, midwifery, Midwifery, Labour",
author = "Homer, {Caroline S E} and Vanessa Scarf and Christine Catling and Deborah DAVIS",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.wombi.2013.09.006",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "46--51",
journal = "Australian journal of midwifery : professional journal of the Australian College of Midwives Incorporated",
issn = "1871-5192",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Culture-based versus risk-based screening for the prevention of group B streptococcal disease in newborns: A review of national guidelines. / Homer, Caroline S E; Scarf, Vanessa; Catling, Christine; DAVIS, Deborah.

In: Women and Birth, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2014, p. 46-51.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Culture-based versus risk-based screening for the prevention of group B streptococcal disease in newborns: A review of national guidelines

AU - Homer, Caroline S E

AU - Scarf, Vanessa

AU - Catling, Christine

AU - DAVIS, Deborah

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: Maternal colonisation with group B streptococcus (GBS) is recognised as the most frequent cause of severe early onset infection in newborns. National and international guidelines outline two approaches to the prevention of early onset disease in the neonate: risk based management and antenatal culture-based screening. We undertook an analysis of existing national and international guidelines in relation to GBS in pregnancy using a standardised and validated instrument to highlight the different recommended approaches to care. Methods: English language guidelines on the screening and management of GBS colonisation in pregnant women and the prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal disease in newborns were sought. Results: Four guidelines met the inclusion criteria, one from the United States of America (USA), the United Kingdom (UK), Canada and New Zealand. All four were appraised as at a high standard in terms of development using the AGREE II tool. Both approaches were recommended in the guidelines with different regions of the world advocating different approaches often based on the same evidence. Guidelines from the USA recommend an antenatal culture-based approach while the UK guidelines recommend risk-based management. Conclusion: Based on an AGREE II analysis, the standard of the guidelines was high despite having disparate recommendations. Both approaches to the prevention of early onset GBS infection in neonates are recommended with the split being geographically-based.

AB - Background: Maternal colonisation with group B streptococcus (GBS) is recognised as the most frequent cause of severe early onset infection in newborns. National and international guidelines outline two approaches to the prevention of early onset disease in the neonate: risk based management and antenatal culture-based screening. We undertook an analysis of existing national and international guidelines in relation to GBS in pregnancy using a standardised and validated instrument to highlight the different recommended approaches to care. Methods: English language guidelines on the screening and management of GBS colonisation in pregnant women and the prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal disease in newborns were sought. Results: Four guidelines met the inclusion criteria, one from the United States of America (USA), the United Kingdom (UK), Canada and New Zealand. All four were appraised as at a high standard in terms of development using the AGREE II tool. Both approaches were recommended in the guidelines with different regions of the world advocating different approaches often based on the same evidence. Guidelines from the USA recommend an antenatal culture-based approach while the UK guidelines recommend risk-based management. Conclusion: Based on an AGREE II analysis, the standard of the guidelines was high despite having disparate recommendations. Both approaches to the prevention of early onset GBS infection in neonates are recommended with the split being geographically-based.

KW - Group B streptococcus

KW - Neonatal infection

KW - Screening

KW - labour

KW - midwifery

KW - Midwifery

KW - Labour

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896316644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/culturebased-versus-riskbased-screening-prevention-group-b-streptococcal-disease-newborns-review-nat-1

U2 - 10.1016/j.wombi.2013.09.006

DO - 10.1016/j.wombi.2013.09.006

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 46

EP - 51

JO - Australian journal of midwifery : professional journal of the Australian College of Midwives Incorporated

JF - Australian journal of midwifery : professional journal of the Australian College of Midwives Incorporated

SN - 1871-5192

IS - 1

ER -