Current State of Public Sector Performance Management in Seven Selected Countries

Mary Rhodes, Lucia Biondi, Ricardo Gomes, Ana Melo, Frank Ohemeng, Gemma Perez-Lopez, Andrea Rossi, Wahyu Sutiyono

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose - This paper seeks to extend the analysis of performance management regimes by Bouckaert and Halligan to other countries in order to contribute to the developing theory of forms and challenges in public sector performance management.

Design/methodology/approach - The state of performance management and the context in which it has evolved is assessed in seven different countries using dimensions drawn from Bouckaert and Halligan's work along with elements from earlier work by Pollitt and Bouckaert. These are summarized in a table and comparisons made to generate additional insights into the factors that influence the shape and speed of public management evolution.

Findings - The paper finds that the Bouckaert and Halligan framework for analyzing public sector performance management is useful, albeit with some modifications. Specifically, it finds that administrative culture is a key factor influencing the speed of reform and that the attitude of elites (politicians and civil servants, in most cases) is also a vital piece of the puzzle that was not included in Bouckaert and Halligan, but did appear in the earlier framework of Pollitt and Bouckaert. It also finds evidence that economic and political crises occurring together accelerate the introduction of integrated performance management systems, but that trust in government does not appear to be a significant factor. Finally, the paper observes that, absent political crisis/commitment, governments will prioritise "external" performance measures such as customer service, participation and transparency objectives over "internal" performance measures such as financial, staff management and whole of government reporting.

Originality/value - The countries studied provide a rare insight into lesser-known performance management regimes and the use of the Bouckaert and Halligan framework allows for comparisons to earlier (and future) research. The findings will be of interest to scholars in public administration reform and performance management
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)235-271
Number of pages37
JournalInternational Journal of Productivity Performance Management
Volume61
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Performance management
Public sector
Performance measures
Government
Influence factors
Integrated
Civil servants
Participation
Politicians
Elites
Design methodology
Trust in government
Customer service
Influencing factors
Public Administration
Factors
Public management
Economics
Staff
Transparency

Cite this

Rhodes, Mary ; Biondi, Lucia ; Gomes, Ricardo ; Melo, Ana ; Ohemeng, Frank ; Perez-Lopez, Gemma ; Rossi, Andrea ; Sutiyono, Wahyu. / Current State of Public Sector Performance Management in Seven Selected Countries. In: International Journal of Productivity Performance Management. 2012 ; Vol. 61, No. 3. pp. 235-271.
@article{303decd517064992aaf2fde9d6710aed,
title = "Current State of Public Sector Performance Management in Seven Selected Countries",
abstract = "Purpose - This paper seeks to extend the analysis of performance management regimes by Bouckaert and Halligan to other countries in order to contribute to the developing theory of forms and challenges in public sector performance management. Design/methodology/approach - The state of performance management and the context in which it has evolved is assessed in seven different countries using dimensions drawn from Bouckaert and Halligan's work along with elements from earlier work by Pollitt and Bouckaert. These are summarized in a table and comparisons made to generate additional insights into the factors that influence the shape and speed of public management evolution. Findings - The paper finds that the Bouckaert and Halligan framework for analyzing public sector performance management is useful, albeit with some modifications. Specifically, it finds that administrative culture is a key factor influencing the speed of reform and that the attitude of elites (politicians and civil servants, in most cases) is also a vital piece of the puzzle that was not included in Bouckaert and Halligan, but did appear in the earlier framework of Pollitt and Bouckaert. It also finds evidence that economic and political crises occurring together accelerate the introduction of integrated performance management systems, but that trust in government does not appear to be a significant factor. Finally, the paper observes that, absent political crisis/commitment, governments will prioritise {"}external{"} performance measures such as customer service, participation and transparency objectives over {"}internal{"} performance measures such as financial, staff management and whole of government reporting. Originality/value - The countries studied provide a rare insight into lesser-known performance management regimes and the use of the Bouckaert and Halligan framework allows for comparisons to earlier (and future) research. The findings will be of interest to scholars in public administration reform and performance management",
keywords = "Performance management, Public Sector",
author = "Mary Rhodes and Lucia Biondi and Ricardo Gomes and Ana Melo and Frank Ohemeng and Gemma Perez-Lopez and Andrea Rossi and Wahyu Sutiyono",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1108/17410401211205632",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "235--271",
journal = "International Journal of Productivity Performance Management",
issn = "0043-8022",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Rhodes, M, Biondi, L, Gomes, R, Melo, A, Ohemeng, F, Perez-Lopez, G, Rossi, A & Sutiyono, W 2012, 'Current State of Public Sector Performance Management in Seven Selected Countries', International Journal of Productivity Performance Management, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 235-271. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401211205632

Current State of Public Sector Performance Management in Seven Selected Countries. / Rhodes, Mary; Biondi, Lucia; Gomes, Ricardo; Melo, Ana; Ohemeng, Frank; Perez-Lopez, Gemma; Rossi, Andrea; Sutiyono, Wahyu.

In: International Journal of Productivity Performance Management, Vol. 61, No. 3, 2012, p. 235-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current State of Public Sector Performance Management in Seven Selected Countries

AU - Rhodes, Mary

AU - Biondi, Lucia

AU - Gomes, Ricardo

AU - Melo, Ana

AU - Ohemeng, Frank

AU - Perez-Lopez, Gemma

AU - Rossi, Andrea

AU - Sutiyono, Wahyu

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Purpose - This paper seeks to extend the analysis of performance management regimes by Bouckaert and Halligan to other countries in order to contribute to the developing theory of forms and challenges in public sector performance management. Design/methodology/approach - The state of performance management and the context in which it has evolved is assessed in seven different countries using dimensions drawn from Bouckaert and Halligan's work along with elements from earlier work by Pollitt and Bouckaert. These are summarized in a table and comparisons made to generate additional insights into the factors that influence the shape and speed of public management evolution. Findings - The paper finds that the Bouckaert and Halligan framework for analyzing public sector performance management is useful, albeit with some modifications. Specifically, it finds that administrative culture is a key factor influencing the speed of reform and that the attitude of elites (politicians and civil servants, in most cases) is also a vital piece of the puzzle that was not included in Bouckaert and Halligan, but did appear in the earlier framework of Pollitt and Bouckaert. It also finds evidence that economic and political crises occurring together accelerate the introduction of integrated performance management systems, but that trust in government does not appear to be a significant factor. Finally, the paper observes that, absent political crisis/commitment, governments will prioritise "external" performance measures such as customer service, participation and transparency objectives over "internal" performance measures such as financial, staff management and whole of government reporting. Originality/value - The countries studied provide a rare insight into lesser-known performance management regimes and the use of the Bouckaert and Halligan framework allows for comparisons to earlier (and future) research. The findings will be of interest to scholars in public administration reform and performance management

AB - Purpose - This paper seeks to extend the analysis of performance management regimes by Bouckaert and Halligan to other countries in order to contribute to the developing theory of forms and challenges in public sector performance management. Design/methodology/approach - The state of performance management and the context in which it has evolved is assessed in seven different countries using dimensions drawn from Bouckaert and Halligan's work along with elements from earlier work by Pollitt and Bouckaert. These are summarized in a table and comparisons made to generate additional insights into the factors that influence the shape and speed of public management evolution. Findings - The paper finds that the Bouckaert and Halligan framework for analyzing public sector performance management is useful, albeit with some modifications. Specifically, it finds that administrative culture is a key factor influencing the speed of reform and that the attitude of elites (politicians and civil servants, in most cases) is also a vital piece of the puzzle that was not included in Bouckaert and Halligan, but did appear in the earlier framework of Pollitt and Bouckaert. It also finds evidence that economic and political crises occurring together accelerate the introduction of integrated performance management systems, but that trust in government does not appear to be a significant factor. Finally, the paper observes that, absent political crisis/commitment, governments will prioritise "external" performance measures such as customer service, participation and transparency objectives over "internal" performance measures such as financial, staff management and whole of government reporting. Originality/value - The countries studied provide a rare insight into lesser-known performance management regimes and the use of the Bouckaert and Halligan framework allows for comparisons to earlier (and future) research. The findings will be of interest to scholars in public administration reform and performance management

KW - Performance management

KW - Public Sector

U2 - 10.1108/17410401211205632

DO - 10.1108/17410401211205632

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 235

EP - 271

JO - International Journal of Productivity Performance Management

JF - International Journal of Productivity Performance Management

SN - 0043-8022

IS - 3

ER -