Current velocity and spatial scale as determinants of the distribution and abundance of two rheophilic herbivorous insects

T.A. Wellnitz, LeRoy POFF, G. Cosyleón, B. Steury

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    40 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Organisms frequently show marked preferences for specific environmental conditions, but these preferences may change with landscape scale. Patterns of distribution or abundance measured at different scales may reveal something about an organism's perception of the environment. To test this hypothesis, we measured densities of two herbivorous aquatic insects that differed in body morphology and mobility in relation to current velocity measured at different scales in the upper Colorado River (Colorado, USA). Streambed densities of the caddisfly larva Agapetus boulderensis (high hydrodynamic profile, low mobility) and mayfly nymph Epeorus sp. (low hydrodynamic profile, high mobility) were assessed at 3 spatial scales: whole riffles, individual cobbles within riffles, and point locations on cobbles. Riffles were several meters in extent, cobbles measured 10–30 cm in size, and the local scale was within a few centimeters of individual larvae (themselves ca. 0.5–1.0 cm in size). We also quantified the abundance of periphytic food for these herbivores at the cobble and riffle scales. Agapetus favored slow current (<30 cm s−1) across all scales. Epeorus, by contrast, favored fast current (60–80 cm s−1) at the local and riffle scale, but not at the cobble scale. Only Agapetus showed a significant relationship to current at the cobble scale, with greatest larval densities occurring at velocities near 30 cm s−1. We had predicted an inverse correlation between grazer density and periphytic abundance; however, this occurred only for Agapetus, and then only at the cobble scale. These data suggest that organisms respond to environmental gradients at different spatial scales and that the processes driving these responses may change with scale, e.g., shifting from individual habitat selection at local and cobble scales to population responses at the riffle scale. This study also highlights the importance of using the appropriate scale of measurement to accurately assess the relationship between organisms and environmental gradients across scale.
    Original languageUndefined
    Pages (from-to)111-120
    Number of pages10
    JournalLandscape Ecology
    Volume16
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2001

    Cite this

    Wellnitz, T.A. ; POFF, LeRoy ; Cosyleón, G. ; Steury, B. / Current velocity and spatial scale as determinants of the distribution and abundance of two rheophilic herbivorous insects. In: Landscape Ecology. 2001 ; Vol. 16, No. 2. pp. 111-120.
    @article{657e79351228460eb38a0f69f032193c,
    title = "Current velocity and spatial scale as determinants of the distribution and abundance of two rheophilic herbivorous insects",
    abstract = "Organisms frequently show marked preferences for specific environmental conditions, but these preferences may change with landscape scale. Patterns of distribution or abundance measured at different scales may reveal something about an organism's perception of the environment. To test this hypothesis, we measured densities of two herbivorous aquatic insects that differed in body morphology and mobility in relation to current velocity measured at different scales in the upper Colorado River (Colorado, USA). Streambed densities of the caddisfly larva Agapetus boulderensis (high hydrodynamic profile, low mobility) and mayfly nymph Epeorus sp. (low hydrodynamic profile, high mobility) were assessed at 3 spatial scales: whole riffles, individual cobbles within riffles, and point locations on cobbles. Riffles were several meters in extent, cobbles measured 10–30 cm in size, and the local scale was within a few centimeters of individual larvae (themselves ca. 0.5–1.0 cm in size). We also quantified the abundance of periphytic food for these herbivores at the cobble and riffle scales. Agapetus favored slow current (<30 cm s−1) across all scales. Epeorus, by contrast, favored fast current (60–80 cm s−1) at the local and riffle scale, but not at the cobble scale. Only Agapetus showed a significant relationship to current at the cobble scale, with greatest larval densities occurring at velocities near 30 cm s−1. We had predicted an inverse correlation between grazer density and periphytic abundance; however, this occurred only for Agapetus, and then only at the cobble scale. These data suggest that organisms respond to environmental gradients at different spatial scales and that the processes driving these responses may change with scale, e.g., shifting from individual habitat selection at local and cobble scales to population responses at the riffle scale. This study also highlights the importance of using the appropriate scale of measurement to accurately assess the relationship between organisms and environmental gradients across scale.",
    author = "T.A. Wellnitz and LeRoy POFF and G. Cosyle{\'o}n and B. Steury",
    note = "cited By 38",
    year = "2001",
    doi = "10.1023/A:1011114414898",
    language = "Undefined",
    volume = "16",
    pages = "111--120",
    journal = "Landscape Ecology",
    issn = "0921-2973",
    publisher = "Springer",
    number = "2",

    }

    Current velocity and spatial scale as determinants of the distribution and abundance of two rheophilic herbivorous insects. / Wellnitz, T.A.; POFF, LeRoy; Cosyleón, G.; Steury, B.

    In: Landscape Ecology, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2001, p. 111-120.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Current velocity and spatial scale as determinants of the distribution and abundance of two rheophilic herbivorous insects

    AU - Wellnitz, T.A.

    AU - POFF, LeRoy

    AU - Cosyleón, G.

    AU - Steury, B.

    N1 - cited By 38

    PY - 2001

    Y1 - 2001

    N2 - Organisms frequently show marked preferences for specific environmental conditions, but these preferences may change with landscape scale. Patterns of distribution or abundance measured at different scales may reveal something about an organism's perception of the environment. To test this hypothesis, we measured densities of two herbivorous aquatic insects that differed in body morphology and mobility in relation to current velocity measured at different scales in the upper Colorado River (Colorado, USA). Streambed densities of the caddisfly larva Agapetus boulderensis (high hydrodynamic profile, low mobility) and mayfly nymph Epeorus sp. (low hydrodynamic profile, high mobility) were assessed at 3 spatial scales: whole riffles, individual cobbles within riffles, and point locations on cobbles. Riffles were several meters in extent, cobbles measured 10–30 cm in size, and the local scale was within a few centimeters of individual larvae (themselves ca. 0.5–1.0 cm in size). We also quantified the abundance of periphytic food for these herbivores at the cobble and riffle scales. Agapetus favored slow current (<30 cm s−1) across all scales. Epeorus, by contrast, favored fast current (60–80 cm s−1) at the local and riffle scale, but not at the cobble scale. Only Agapetus showed a significant relationship to current at the cobble scale, with greatest larval densities occurring at velocities near 30 cm s−1. We had predicted an inverse correlation between grazer density and periphytic abundance; however, this occurred only for Agapetus, and then only at the cobble scale. These data suggest that organisms respond to environmental gradients at different spatial scales and that the processes driving these responses may change with scale, e.g., shifting from individual habitat selection at local and cobble scales to population responses at the riffle scale. This study also highlights the importance of using the appropriate scale of measurement to accurately assess the relationship between organisms and environmental gradients across scale.

    AB - Organisms frequently show marked preferences for specific environmental conditions, but these preferences may change with landscape scale. Patterns of distribution or abundance measured at different scales may reveal something about an organism's perception of the environment. To test this hypothesis, we measured densities of two herbivorous aquatic insects that differed in body morphology and mobility in relation to current velocity measured at different scales in the upper Colorado River (Colorado, USA). Streambed densities of the caddisfly larva Agapetus boulderensis (high hydrodynamic profile, low mobility) and mayfly nymph Epeorus sp. (low hydrodynamic profile, high mobility) were assessed at 3 spatial scales: whole riffles, individual cobbles within riffles, and point locations on cobbles. Riffles were several meters in extent, cobbles measured 10–30 cm in size, and the local scale was within a few centimeters of individual larvae (themselves ca. 0.5–1.0 cm in size). We also quantified the abundance of periphytic food for these herbivores at the cobble and riffle scales. Agapetus favored slow current (<30 cm s−1) across all scales. Epeorus, by contrast, favored fast current (60–80 cm s−1) at the local and riffle scale, but not at the cobble scale. Only Agapetus showed a significant relationship to current at the cobble scale, with greatest larval densities occurring at velocities near 30 cm s−1. We had predicted an inverse correlation between grazer density and periphytic abundance; however, this occurred only for Agapetus, and then only at the cobble scale. These data suggest that organisms respond to environmental gradients at different spatial scales and that the processes driving these responses may change with scale, e.g., shifting from individual habitat selection at local and cobble scales to population responses at the riffle scale. This study also highlights the importance of using the appropriate scale of measurement to accurately assess the relationship between organisms and environmental gradients across scale.

    U2 - 10.1023/A:1011114414898

    DO - 10.1023/A:1011114414898

    M3 - Article

    VL - 16

    SP - 111

    EP - 120

    JO - Landscape Ecology

    JF - Landscape Ecology

    SN - 0921-2973

    IS - 2

    ER -