Data assemblages, sentient schools and digitised health and physical education (response to Gard)

Deborah Lupton

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    84 Citations (Scopus)
    53 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Michael Gard raises some important issues in his opinion piece on digitised health and physical education (HPE) in the school setting. His piece represents the beginning of a more critical approach to the instrumental and solutionist perspectives that are currently offered on digitised HPE. Few commentators in education, health promotion or sports studies have begun to realise the extent to which digital data surveillance and analytics are now encroaching into many social institutions and settings and the ways in which actors and agencies in the digital knowledge economy are appropriating these data. Identifying what is happening and the implications for the concepts of selfhood, body and social relations, not to mention the more specific issues of privacy and the commercialisation and exploitation of personal data, requires much greater attention than these issues have previously received in the critical social research literature. While Gard has begun to do this in his article, there is much more to discuss. In this response, I present some discussion that seeks to provide a complementary commentary on the broader context in which digitised HPE is developing and manifesting. Whether or not one takes a position that is techno-utopian, dystopian or somewhere in between, I would argue that to fully understand the social, cultural and political resonances of digitised HPE, such contextualising is vital.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)122-132
    Number of pages11
    JournalSport, Education and Society
    Volume20
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Data assemblages, sentient schools and digitised health and physical education (response to Gard)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this