Defensive reflexes in people with pain - a biomarker of the need to protect? A meta-analytical systematic review.

SB Wallwork, L Grabherr, NE O'Connell, MJ Catley, GL Moseley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Upregulation of defensive reflexes such as the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) has been attributed to sensitisation of peripheral and spinal nociceptors and is often considered biomarkers of pain. Experimental modulation of defensive reflexes raises the possibility that they might be better conceptualised as markers of descending cognitive control. Despite strongly held views on both sides and several narrative reviews, there has been no attempt to evaluate the evidence in a systematic manner. We undertook a meta-analytical systematic review of the extant English-language literature from inception. Thirty-six studies satisfied our a priori criteria. Seventeen were included in the meta-analysis. Reflexive threshold was lower in people with clinical pain than it was in pain-free controls, but reflex size, latency, and duration were unaffected. The pattern of difference was not consistent with sensitisation of nociceptive neurones, as these changes were not isolated to the affected body part but was more consistent with top-down cognitive control reflective of heightened protection of body tissue. The pattern of modulation is dependent on potentially complex evaluative mechanisms. We offer recommendations for future investigations and suggest that defensive reflex threshold may reflect a biomarker of a broader psychological construct related to bodily protection, rather than sensitisation of primary nociceptors, spinal nociceptors, or pain.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)381-396
Number of pages16
JournalReviews in the Neurosciences
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 May 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nociceptors
Reflex
Biomarkers
Pain
Human Body
Meta-Analysis
Up-Regulation
Language
Psychology

Cite this

Wallwork, SB ; Grabherr, L ; O'Connell, NE ; Catley, MJ ; Moseley, GL. / Defensive reflexes in people with pain - a biomarker of the need to protect? A meta-analytical systematic review. In: Reviews in the Neurosciences. 2017 ; Vol. 28, No. 4. pp. 381-396.
@article{ea776433617f4b1d9df2a2b22f67e9f2,
title = "Defensive reflexes in people with pain - a biomarker of the need to protect? A meta-analytical systematic review.",
abstract = "Upregulation of defensive reflexes such as the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) has been attributed to sensitisation of peripheral and spinal nociceptors and is often considered biomarkers of pain. Experimental modulation of defensive reflexes raises the possibility that they might be better conceptualised as markers of descending cognitive control. Despite strongly held views on both sides and several narrative reviews, there has been no attempt to evaluate the evidence in a systematic manner. We undertook a meta-analytical systematic review of the extant English-language literature from inception. Thirty-six studies satisfied our a priori criteria. Seventeen were included in the meta-analysis. Reflexive threshold was lower in people with clinical pain than it was in pain-free controls, but reflex size, latency, and duration were unaffected. The pattern of difference was not consistent with sensitisation of nociceptive neurones, as these changes were not isolated to the affected body part but was more consistent with top-down cognitive control reflective of heightened protection of body tissue. The pattern of modulation is dependent on potentially complex evaluative mechanisms. We offer recommendations for future investigations and suggest that defensive reflex threshold may reflect a biomarker of a broader psychological construct related to bodily protection, rather than sensitisation of primary nociceptors, spinal nociceptors, or pain.",
keywords = "body protection, central sensitisation, defence, pain, reflexes",
author = "SB Wallwork and L Grabherr and NE O'Connell and MJ Catley and GL Moseley",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1515/revneuro-2016-0057",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "381--396",
journal = "Reviews in the Neurosciences",
issn = "0334-1763",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "4",

}

Defensive reflexes in people with pain - a biomarker of the need to protect? A meta-analytical systematic review. / Wallwork, SB; Grabherr, L; O'Connell, NE; Catley, MJ; Moseley, GL.

In: Reviews in the Neurosciences, Vol. 28, No. 4, 24.05.2017, p. 381-396.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defensive reflexes in people with pain - a biomarker of the need to protect? A meta-analytical systematic review.

AU - Wallwork, SB

AU - Grabherr, L

AU - O'Connell, NE

AU - Catley, MJ

AU - Moseley, GL

PY - 2017/5/24

Y1 - 2017/5/24

N2 - Upregulation of defensive reflexes such as the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) has been attributed to sensitisation of peripheral and spinal nociceptors and is often considered biomarkers of pain. Experimental modulation of defensive reflexes raises the possibility that they might be better conceptualised as markers of descending cognitive control. Despite strongly held views on both sides and several narrative reviews, there has been no attempt to evaluate the evidence in a systematic manner. We undertook a meta-analytical systematic review of the extant English-language literature from inception. Thirty-six studies satisfied our a priori criteria. Seventeen were included in the meta-analysis. Reflexive threshold was lower in people with clinical pain than it was in pain-free controls, but reflex size, latency, and duration were unaffected. The pattern of difference was not consistent with sensitisation of nociceptive neurones, as these changes were not isolated to the affected body part but was more consistent with top-down cognitive control reflective of heightened protection of body tissue. The pattern of modulation is dependent on potentially complex evaluative mechanisms. We offer recommendations for future investigations and suggest that defensive reflex threshold may reflect a biomarker of a broader psychological construct related to bodily protection, rather than sensitisation of primary nociceptors, spinal nociceptors, or pain.

AB - Upregulation of defensive reflexes such as the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) has been attributed to sensitisation of peripheral and spinal nociceptors and is often considered biomarkers of pain. Experimental modulation of defensive reflexes raises the possibility that they might be better conceptualised as markers of descending cognitive control. Despite strongly held views on both sides and several narrative reviews, there has been no attempt to evaluate the evidence in a systematic manner. We undertook a meta-analytical systematic review of the extant English-language literature from inception. Thirty-six studies satisfied our a priori criteria. Seventeen were included in the meta-analysis. Reflexive threshold was lower in people with clinical pain than it was in pain-free controls, but reflex size, latency, and duration were unaffected. The pattern of difference was not consistent with sensitisation of nociceptive neurones, as these changes were not isolated to the affected body part but was more consistent with top-down cognitive control reflective of heightened protection of body tissue. The pattern of modulation is dependent on potentially complex evaluative mechanisms. We offer recommendations for future investigations and suggest that defensive reflex threshold may reflect a biomarker of a broader psychological construct related to bodily protection, rather than sensitisation of primary nociceptors, spinal nociceptors, or pain.

KW - body protection

KW - central sensitisation

KW - defence

KW - pain

KW - reflexes

U2 - 10.1515/revneuro-2016-0057

DO - 10.1515/revneuro-2016-0057

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 381

EP - 396

JO - Reviews in the Neurosciences

JF - Reviews in the Neurosciences

SN - 0334-1763

IS - 4

ER -