Abstract
A 2013 cross-jurisdictional Australian analysis of the content and substance of protection order legislation found the ACT to have the weakest protection — in part since it fails to mention specific types of domestic violence within its definition of domestic violence for interim and final orders. This study investigates how true this is in practice and examine if the experiences of applicants that are not defined in the Domestic Violence and Protection Orders Act 2008 (‘the
Act’) less visible and less protected than those that are?.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 113-117 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Alternative Law Journal |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Defining Domestic Violence in Protection Order Legislation: A pilot observational study in the ACT'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver