Definitions, Foundations and Associations of Physical Literacy: A Systematic Review

Lowri Edwards, Anna Bryant, Richard KEEGAN, Kevin Morgan, Anwen Jones

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    44 Citations (Scopus)
    5 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background: The concept of physical literacy has stimulated increased research attention in recent years—being deployed in physical education, sport participation, and the promotion of physical activity. Independent research groups currently operationalize the construct differently. Objective: The purpose of this systematic review was to conduct a systematic review of the physical literacy construct, as reflected in contemporary research literature. Methods: Five databases were searched using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic reviews. Inclusion criteria were English language, peer reviewed, published by March 2016, and seeking to conceptualize physical literacy. Articles that met these criteria were analyzed in relation to three core areas: properties/attributes, philosophical foundations and theoretical associations with other constructs. A total of 50 published articles met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed qualitatively using inductive thematic analysis. Results: The thematic analysis addressed the three core areas. Under definitions, core attributes that define physical literacy were identified, as well as areas of conflict between different approaches currently being adopted. One relatively clear philosophical approach was prominent in approximately half of the papers, based on a monist/holistic ontology and phenomenological epistemology. Finally, the analysis identified a number of theoretical associations, including health, physical activity and academic performance. Conclusions: Current literature contains different representations of the physical literacy construct. The costs and benefits of adopting an exclusive approach versus pluralism are considered. Recommendations for both researchers and practitioners focus on identifying and clearly articulating the definitions, philosophical assumptions and expected outcomes prior to evaluating the effectiveness of this emerging concept.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)113-126
    Number of pages14
    JournalSports Medicine
    Volume47
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Fingerprint

    Research
    Physical Phenomena
    Cultural Diversity
    Physical Education and Training
    Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Sports
    Meta-Analysis
    Language
    Research Personnel
    Literacy
    Databases
    Guidelines
    Health
    Conflict (Psychology)

    Cite this

    Edwards, Lowri ; Bryant, Anna ; KEEGAN, Richard ; Morgan, Kevin ; Jones, Anwen. / Definitions, Foundations and Associations of Physical Literacy: A Systematic Review. In: Sports Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 47, No. 1. pp. 113-126.
    @article{392ca9ea3a724c9bba960f3563eecff3,
    title = "Definitions, Foundations and Associations of Physical Literacy: A Systematic Review",
    abstract = "Background: The concept of physical literacy has stimulated increased research attention in recent years—being deployed in physical education, sport participation, and the promotion of physical activity. Independent research groups currently operationalize the construct differently. Objective: The purpose of this systematic review was to conduct a systematic review of the physical literacy construct, as reflected in contemporary research literature. Methods: Five databases were searched using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic reviews. Inclusion criteria were English language, peer reviewed, published by March 2016, and seeking to conceptualize physical literacy. Articles that met these criteria were analyzed in relation to three core areas: properties/attributes, philosophical foundations and theoretical associations with other constructs. A total of 50 published articles met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed qualitatively using inductive thematic analysis. Results: The thematic analysis addressed the three core areas. Under definitions, core attributes that define physical literacy were identified, as well as areas of conflict between different approaches currently being adopted. One relatively clear philosophical approach was prominent in approximately half of the papers, based on a monist/holistic ontology and phenomenological epistemology. Finally, the analysis identified a number of theoretical associations, including health, physical activity and academic performance. Conclusions: Current literature contains different representations of the physical literacy construct. The costs and benefits of adopting an exclusive approach versus pluralism are considered. Recommendations for both researchers and practitioners focus on identifying and clearly articulating the definitions, philosophical assumptions and expected outcomes prior to evaluating the effectiveness of this emerging concept.",
    keywords = "Humans, Literacy, Physical Education and Training, Sports",
    author = "Lowri Edwards and Anna Bryant and Richard KEEGAN and Kevin Morgan and Anwen Jones",
    year = "2017",
    doi = "10.1007/s40279-016-0560-7",
    language = "English",
    volume = "47",
    pages = "113--126",
    journal = "Sports Medicine",
    issn = "0112-1642",
    publisher = "Springer",
    number = "1",

    }

    Definitions, Foundations and Associations of Physical Literacy: A Systematic Review. / Edwards, Lowri; Bryant, Anna; KEEGAN, Richard; Morgan, Kevin; Jones, Anwen.

    In: Sports Medicine, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2017, p. 113-126.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Definitions, Foundations and Associations of Physical Literacy: A Systematic Review

    AU - Edwards, Lowri

    AU - Bryant, Anna

    AU - KEEGAN, Richard

    AU - Morgan, Kevin

    AU - Jones, Anwen

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - Background: The concept of physical literacy has stimulated increased research attention in recent years—being deployed in physical education, sport participation, and the promotion of physical activity. Independent research groups currently operationalize the construct differently. Objective: The purpose of this systematic review was to conduct a systematic review of the physical literacy construct, as reflected in contemporary research literature. Methods: Five databases were searched using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic reviews. Inclusion criteria were English language, peer reviewed, published by March 2016, and seeking to conceptualize physical literacy. Articles that met these criteria were analyzed in relation to three core areas: properties/attributes, philosophical foundations and theoretical associations with other constructs. A total of 50 published articles met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed qualitatively using inductive thematic analysis. Results: The thematic analysis addressed the three core areas. Under definitions, core attributes that define physical literacy were identified, as well as areas of conflict between different approaches currently being adopted. One relatively clear philosophical approach was prominent in approximately half of the papers, based on a monist/holistic ontology and phenomenological epistemology. Finally, the analysis identified a number of theoretical associations, including health, physical activity and academic performance. Conclusions: Current literature contains different representations of the physical literacy construct. The costs and benefits of adopting an exclusive approach versus pluralism are considered. Recommendations for both researchers and practitioners focus on identifying and clearly articulating the definitions, philosophical assumptions and expected outcomes prior to evaluating the effectiveness of this emerging concept.

    AB - Background: The concept of physical literacy has stimulated increased research attention in recent years—being deployed in physical education, sport participation, and the promotion of physical activity. Independent research groups currently operationalize the construct differently. Objective: The purpose of this systematic review was to conduct a systematic review of the physical literacy construct, as reflected in contemporary research literature. Methods: Five databases were searched using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic reviews. Inclusion criteria were English language, peer reviewed, published by March 2016, and seeking to conceptualize physical literacy. Articles that met these criteria were analyzed in relation to three core areas: properties/attributes, philosophical foundations and theoretical associations with other constructs. A total of 50 published articles met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed qualitatively using inductive thematic analysis. Results: The thematic analysis addressed the three core areas. Under definitions, core attributes that define physical literacy were identified, as well as areas of conflict between different approaches currently being adopted. One relatively clear philosophical approach was prominent in approximately half of the papers, based on a monist/holistic ontology and phenomenological epistemology. Finally, the analysis identified a number of theoretical associations, including health, physical activity and academic performance. Conclusions: Current literature contains different representations of the physical literacy construct. The costs and benefits of adopting an exclusive approach versus pluralism are considered. Recommendations for both researchers and practitioners focus on identifying and clearly articulating the definitions, philosophical assumptions and expected outcomes prior to evaluating the effectiveness of this emerging concept.

    KW - Humans

    KW - Literacy

    KW - Physical Education and Training

    KW - Sports

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976498196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/definitions-foundations-associations-physical-literacy-systematic-review

    U2 - 10.1007/s40279-016-0560-7

    DO - 10.1007/s40279-016-0560-7

    M3 - Article

    VL - 47

    SP - 113

    EP - 126

    JO - Sports Medicine

    JF - Sports Medicine

    SN - 0112-1642

    IS - 1

    ER -