Deliberation in the wilderness

Displacing symbolic politics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

92 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The environmental benefits of deliberative democracy are increasingly cited, but not well understood. Nor are the processes involved in arriving at deliberated policy preferences in contrast to those under the status quo. Analysis of the Far North Queensland Citizens' Jury (FNQCJ) reveals that the difference reflects as much a move away from a non-deliberative status quo as toward a deliberative ideal. Before deliberation, symbolic arguments proffered by political interests resulted in deep fracturing of an underlying environmental consensus. The deliberative process served to dissipate symbolic claims, liberating citizens to formulate their own judgements based largely on this pre-existing environmental concern. The findings suggest a focus for deliberative democracy in displacing symbolic politics that disenfranchises both nature and humans.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)347-372
Number of pages26
JournalEnvironmental Politics
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

symbolic politics
deliberative democracy
deliberation
democracy
politics
citizen
political interest
policy
analysis

Cite this

@article{a169833449414bd2a2962dabb407188c,
title = "Deliberation in the wilderness: Displacing symbolic politics",
abstract = "The environmental benefits of deliberative democracy are increasingly cited, but not well understood. Nor are the processes involved in arriving at deliberated policy preferences in contrast to those under the status quo. Analysis of the Far North Queensland Citizens' Jury (FNQCJ) reveals that the difference reflects as much a move away from a non-deliberative status quo as toward a deliberative ideal. Before deliberation, symbolic arguments proffered by political interests resulted in deep fracturing of an underlying environmental consensus. The deliberative process served to dissipate symbolic claims, liberating citizens to formulate their own judgements based largely on this pre-existing environmental concern. The findings suggest a focus for deliberative democracy in displacing symbolic politics that disenfranchises both nature and humans.",
keywords = "deliberative democracy, environmental governance",
author = "Simon Niemeyer",
year = "2004",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/0964401042000209612",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "347--372",
journal = "Environmental Politics",
issn = "0964-4016",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Deliberation in the wilderness : Displacing symbolic politics. / Niemeyer, Simon.

In: Environmental Politics, Vol. 13, No. 2, 01.06.2004, p. 347-372.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deliberation in the wilderness

T2 - Displacing symbolic politics

AU - Niemeyer, Simon

PY - 2004/6/1

Y1 - 2004/6/1

N2 - The environmental benefits of deliberative democracy are increasingly cited, but not well understood. Nor are the processes involved in arriving at deliberated policy preferences in contrast to those under the status quo. Analysis of the Far North Queensland Citizens' Jury (FNQCJ) reveals that the difference reflects as much a move away from a non-deliberative status quo as toward a deliberative ideal. Before deliberation, symbolic arguments proffered by political interests resulted in deep fracturing of an underlying environmental consensus. The deliberative process served to dissipate symbolic claims, liberating citizens to formulate their own judgements based largely on this pre-existing environmental concern. The findings suggest a focus for deliberative democracy in displacing symbolic politics that disenfranchises both nature and humans.

AB - The environmental benefits of deliberative democracy are increasingly cited, but not well understood. Nor are the processes involved in arriving at deliberated policy preferences in contrast to those under the status quo. Analysis of the Far North Queensland Citizens' Jury (FNQCJ) reveals that the difference reflects as much a move away from a non-deliberative status quo as toward a deliberative ideal. Before deliberation, symbolic arguments proffered by political interests resulted in deep fracturing of an underlying environmental consensus. The deliberative process served to dissipate symbolic claims, liberating citizens to formulate their own judgements based largely on this pre-existing environmental concern. The findings suggest a focus for deliberative democracy in displacing symbolic politics that disenfranchises both nature and humans.

KW - deliberative democracy

KW - environmental governance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3042693378&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0964401042000209612

DO - 10.1080/0964401042000209612

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 347

EP - 372

JO - Environmental Politics

JF - Environmental Politics

SN - 0964-4016

IS - 2

ER -