Deliberative Democracy and Comparative Democratisation Studies

Nicole CURATO, Jurg Steiner

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

Abstract

Deliberation is often pitched as a tool for ‘democratic deepening.’ It is described as antidote to the malaise of contemporary democracies where voter apathy, declining levels of political trust and spin-driven discourse have come to define the conduct of politics. Public deliberation, as the story goes, can reinvigorate civic life by empowering citizens to influence collective decision-making. Over the years, deliberative democrats have made a strong case for democratic innovations that promote inclusive and consequential reason-giving, which, in turn, enhance the legitimacy of ‘advanced’ liberal democracies.
The promise of deliberation, however, is not only limited to ‘mature’ democracies. Fragile political environments can create spaces for deliberation to manage political tensions and develop a shared vision for a society recovering from traumas of dictatorship and armed conflict. In this chapter, we explain the ways in which deliberation plays a crucial role in democratisation and how to examine this phenomenon. Our aim is to provide a theoretically-informed and empirically grounded overview of deliberation’s transformative power in shaping the trajectory of democratising polities.
We develop these ideas in three parts. We begin by answering the question: Why does deliberation matter in democratic transition and consolidation? We put forward three reasons by drawing on empirical examples that illustrate the potency of deliberation as a distinct form of communication in shaping countries’ democratic trajectory. The second part then identifies developments in democracy assessment literature that compliment and give space to a deliberative framework. We also illustrate how a deliberative perspective can fill some gaps and speak to the broader literature on comparative studies of democratisation. In the final section, we propose conceptual approaches to examine the deliberative quality of democratising polities. Deliberative democrats are challenged to embrace the complexity of democratisation while maintaining analytic rigour in spotting discourses, spaces and mechanisms that shape the trajectory of democratising polities.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages1-9
Number of pages9
ISBN (Electronic)9780198747369
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Publication series

NameOxford Handbooks
PublisherOxford University Press

Fingerprint

deliberative democracy
deliberation
democratization
democracy
collective decision
apathy
discourse
dictatorship
consolidation
trauma
voter
legitimacy
citizen
innovation
decision making
politics
communication

Cite this

CURATO, N., & Steiner, J. (2018). Deliberative Democracy and Comparative Democratisation Studies. In Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy (pp. 1-9). (Oxford Handbooks). Oxford University Press.
CURATO, Nicole ; Steiner, Jurg. / Deliberative Democracy and Comparative Democratisation Studies. Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2018. pp. 1-9 (Oxford Handbooks).
@inbook{36903f955fdc4b1fa1c78d497ba4ea71,
title = "Deliberative Democracy and Comparative Democratisation Studies",
abstract = "Deliberation is often pitched as a tool for ‘democratic deepening.’ It is described as antidote to the malaise of contemporary democracies where voter apathy, declining levels of political trust and spin-driven discourse have come to define the conduct of politics. Public deliberation, as the story goes, can reinvigorate civic life by empowering citizens to influence collective decision-making. Over the years, deliberative democrats have made a strong case for democratic innovations that promote inclusive and consequential reason-giving, which, in turn, enhance the legitimacy of ‘advanced’ liberal democracies.The promise of deliberation, however, is not only limited to ‘mature’ democracies. Fragile political environments can create spaces for deliberation to manage political tensions and develop a shared vision for a society recovering from traumas of dictatorship and armed conflict. In this chapter, we explain the ways in which deliberation plays a crucial role in democratisation and how to examine this phenomenon. Our aim is to provide a theoretically-informed and empirically grounded overview of deliberation’s transformative power in shaping the trajectory of democratising polities. We develop these ideas in three parts. We begin by answering the question: Why does deliberation matter in democratic transition and consolidation? We put forward three reasons by drawing on empirical examples that illustrate the potency of deliberation as a distinct form of communication in shaping countries’ democratic trajectory. The second part then identifies developments in democracy assessment literature that compliment and give space to a deliberative framework. We also illustrate how a deliberative perspective can fill some gaps and speak to the broader literature on comparative studies of democratisation. In the final section, we propose conceptual approaches to examine the deliberative quality of democratising polities. Deliberative democrats are challenged to embrace the complexity of democratisation while maintaining analytic rigour in spotting discourses, spaces and mechanisms that shape the trajectory of democratising polities.",
author = "Nicole CURATO and Jurg Steiner",
note = "Curato, N. and Steiner, J. ‘Deliberative Democracy and Comparative Democratisation Studies,’ in Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, J. Dryzek, J. Mansbridge, A. B{\"a}chtiger and M. Warren (eds.) Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 490-501.",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
series = "Oxford Handbooks",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
pages = "1--9",
booktitle = "Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy",
address = "United States",

}

CURATO, N & Steiner, J 2018, Deliberative Democracy and Comparative Democratisation Studies. in Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford Handbooks, Oxford University Press, pp. 1-9.

Deliberative Democracy and Comparative Democratisation Studies. / CURATO, Nicole; Steiner, Jurg.

Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2018. p. 1-9 (Oxford Handbooks).

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Deliberative Democracy and Comparative Democratisation Studies

AU - CURATO, Nicole

AU - Steiner, Jurg

N1 - Curato, N. and Steiner, J. ‘Deliberative Democracy and Comparative Democratisation Studies,’ in Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, J. Dryzek, J. Mansbridge, A. Bächtiger and M. Warren (eds.) Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 490-501.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Deliberation is often pitched as a tool for ‘democratic deepening.’ It is described as antidote to the malaise of contemporary democracies where voter apathy, declining levels of political trust and spin-driven discourse have come to define the conduct of politics. Public deliberation, as the story goes, can reinvigorate civic life by empowering citizens to influence collective decision-making. Over the years, deliberative democrats have made a strong case for democratic innovations that promote inclusive and consequential reason-giving, which, in turn, enhance the legitimacy of ‘advanced’ liberal democracies.The promise of deliberation, however, is not only limited to ‘mature’ democracies. Fragile political environments can create spaces for deliberation to manage political tensions and develop a shared vision for a society recovering from traumas of dictatorship and armed conflict. In this chapter, we explain the ways in which deliberation plays a crucial role in democratisation and how to examine this phenomenon. Our aim is to provide a theoretically-informed and empirically grounded overview of deliberation’s transformative power in shaping the trajectory of democratising polities. We develop these ideas in three parts. We begin by answering the question: Why does deliberation matter in democratic transition and consolidation? We put forward three reasons by drawing on empirical examples that illustrate the potency of deliberation as a distinct form of communication in shaping countries’ democratic trajectory. The second part then identifies developments in democracy assessment literature that compliment and give space to a deliberative framework. We also illustrate how a deliberative perspective can fill some gaps and speak to the broader literature on comparative studies of democratisation. In the final section, we propose conceptual approaches to examine the deliberative quality of democratising polities. Deliberative democrats are challenged to embrace the complexity of democratisation while maintaining analytic rigour in spotting discourses, spaces and mechanisms that shape the trajectory of democratising polities.

AB - Deliberation is often pitched as a tool for ‘democratic deepening.’ It is described as antidote to the malaise of contemporary democracies where voter apathy, declining levels of political trust and spin-driven discourse have come to define the conduct of politics. Public deliberation, as the story goes, can reinvigorate civic life by empowering citizens to influence collective decision-making. Over the years, deliberative democrats have made a strong case for democratic innovations that promote inclusive and consequential reason-giving, which, in turn, enhance the legitimacy of ‘advanced’ liberal democracies.The promise of deliberation, however, is not only limited to ‘mature’ democracies. Fragile political environments can create spaces for deliberation to manage political tensions and develop a shared vision for a society recovering from traumas of dictatorship and armed conflict. In this chapter, we explain the ways in which deliberation plays a crucial role in democratisation and how to examine this phenomenon. Our aim is to provide a theoretically-informed and empirically grounded overview of deliberation’s transformative power in shaping the trajectory of democratising polities. We develop these ideas in three parts. We begin by answering the question: Why does deliberation matter in democratic transition and consolidation? We put forward three reasons by drawing on empirical examples that illustrate the potency of deliberation as a distinct form of communication in shaping countries’ democratic trajectory. The second part then identifies developments in democracy assessment literature that compliment and give space to a deliberative framework. We also illustrate how a deliberative perspective can fill some gaps and speak to the broader literature on comparative studies of democratisation. In the final section, we propose conceptual approaches to examine the deliberative quality of democratising polities. Deliberative democrats are challenged to embrace the complexity of democratisation while maintaining analytic rigour in spotting discourses, spaces and mechanisms that shape the trajectory of democratising polities.

UR - https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-deliberative-democracy-9780198747369?cc=au&lang=en&#

M3 - Chapter

T3 - Oxford Handbooks

SP - 1

EP - 9

BT - Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -

CURATO N, Steiner J. Deliberative Democracy and Comparative Democratisation Studies. In Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press. 2018. p. 1-9. (Oxford Handbooks).