Deliberative democracy and the Tasmanian forest peace process

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    6 Citations (Scopus)
    2 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Decades of contention regarding Tasmania's forests have been accompanied by several attempts for peace. Most recently the ‘forest peace process’ culminated in the 2012 Tasmanian Forest Agreement (TFA). We evaluate the peace process that led to the TFA, and its subsequent dismantling, from the perspective of deliberative democracy, which promises to achieve democratically legitimate outcomes in the toughest conflicts. Using normative criteria to evaluate the deliberative democratic quality of the process, our analysis shows that trades-offs were needed, and not all normative criteria could be achieved equally and simultaneously. Despite its shortcomings, and short-lived life, the peace process illustrates the possibility of achieving meta-consensus in deep value conflicts, and the crucial role of this consensus for sustaining deliberation
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)288-307
    Number of pages20
    JournalAustralian Journal of Political Science
    Volume51
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    deliberative democracy
    peace process
    process analysis
    dismantling
    deliberation
    peace
    Values

    Cite this

    @article{cf1a578881014159b4608d84a8b2e71e,
    title = "Deliberative democracy and the Tasmanian forest peace process",
    abstract = "Decades of contention regarding Tasmania's forests have been accompanied by several attempts for peace. Most recently the ‘forest peace process’ culminated in the 2012 Tasmanian Forest Agreement (TFA). We evaluate the peace process that led to the TFA, and its subsequent dismantling, from the perspective of deliberative democracy, which promises to achieve democratically legitimate outcomes in the toughest conflicts. Using normative criteria to evaluate the deliberative democratic quality of the process, our analysis shows that trades-offs were needed, and not all normative criteria could be achieved equally and simultaneously. Despite its shortcomings, and short-lived life, the peace process illustrates the possibility of achieving meta-consensus in deep value conflicts, and the crucial role of this consensus for sustaining deliberation",
    author = "Jacki SCHIRMER and Lain Dare and Selen ERCAN",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1080/10361146.2015.1123673",
    language = "English",
    volume = "51",
    pages = "288--307",
    journal = "Australian Journal of Political Science",
    issn = "1036-1146",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "2",

    }

    Deliberative democracy and the Tasmanian forest peace process. / SCHIRMER, Jacki; Dare, Lain; ERCAN, Selen.

    In: Australian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2016, p. 288-307.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Deliberative democracy and the Tasmanian forest peace process

    AU - SCHIRMER, Jacki

    AU - Dare, Lain

    AU - ERCAN, Selen

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - Decades of contention regarding Tasmania's forests have been accompanied by several attempts for peace. Most recently the ‘forest peace process’ culminated in the 2012 Tasmanian Forest Agreement (TFA). We evaluate the peace process that led to the TFA, and its subsequent dismantling, from the perspective of deliberative democracy, which promises to achieve democratically legitimate outcomes in the toughest conflicts. Using normative criteria to evaluate the deliberative democratic quality of the process, our analysis shows that trades-offs were needed, and not all normative criteria could be achieved equally and simultaneously. Despite its shortcomings, and short-lived life, the peace process illustrates the possibility of achieving meta-consensus in deep value conflicts, and the crucial role of this consensus for sustaining deliberation

    AB - Decades of contention regarding Tasmania's forests have been accompanied by several attempts for peace. Most recently the ‘forest peace process’ culminated in the 2012 Tasmanian Forest Agreement (TFA). We evaluate the peace process that led to the TFA, and its subsequent dismantling, from the perspective of deliberative democracy, which promises to achieve democratically legitimate outcomes in the toughest conflicts. Using normative criteria to evaluate the deliberative democratic quality of the process, our analysis shows that trades-offs were needed, and not all normative criteria could be achieved equally and simultaneously. Despite its shortcomings, and short-lived life, the peace process illustrates the possibility of achieving meta-consensus in deep value conflicts, and the crucial role of this consensus for sustaining deliberation

    U2 - 10.1080/10361146.2015.1123673

    DO - 10.1080/10361146.2015.1123673

    M3 - Article

    VL - 51

    SP - 288

    EP - 307

    JO - Australian Journal of Political Science

    JF - Australian Journal of Political Science

    SN - 1036-1146

    IS - 2

    ER -