Deliberative democratization: a framework for systemic analysis

I O'Flynn, Nicole CURATO

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In the transition literature, ‘free and fair elections’ is often treated as the most important indicator of democratic quality. In this paper, however, we argue that ‘free deliberation among equals’ is in many respects a more telling measure. On the face of it, this argument might strike one as implausible. After all, the decisive moment in many transitions is the signing of a pact between elements in the government and opposition who are more concerned to protect their own interests than to explain themselves to others. Yet while pacts may not be particularly deliberative, they still occasion a great deal of deliberation across society as a whole. We argue that the different sites where deliberation occurs can be understood as forming a deliberative system. To give substance to this idea, we then outline a systemic framework that may be used to describe and evaluate the deliberative capacity of transitional regimes. Finally, we turn to the cases of Venezuela and Poland to illustrate the empirical application of this approach. Both transitions were founded on a pact. Yet differences in the nature of those pacts and the broader deliberative systems in which they were located tell us a lot about where those countries are today.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)298-313
Number of pages16
JournalPolicy Studies
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

deliberation
democratization
Venezuela
Poland
opposition
election
regime

Cite this

@article{ccf0260054ab40bb8ce2d8667e3c7100,
title = "Deliberative democratization: a framework for systemic analysis",
abstract = "In the transition literature, ‘free and fair elections’ is often treated as the most important indicator of democratic quality. In this paper, however, we argue that ‘free deliberation among equals’ is in many respects a more telling measure. On the face of it, this argument might strike one as implausible. After all, the decisive moment in many transitions is the signing of a pact between elements in the government and opposition who are more concerned to protect their own interests than to explain themselves to others. Yet while pacts may not be particularly deliberative, they still occasion a great deal of deliberation across society as a whole. We argue that the different sites where deliberation occurs can be understood as forming a deliberative system. To give substance to this idea, we then outline a systemic framework that may be used to describe and evaluate the deliberative capacity of transitional regimes. Finally, we turn to the cases of Venezuela and Poland to illustrate the empirical application of this approach. Both transitions were founded on a pact. Yet differences in the nature of those pacts and the broader deliberative systems in which they were located tell us a lot about where those countries are today.",
keywords = "Deliberative capacity, Poland, Venezuela, deliberative system, democratization, pact",
author = "I O'Flynn and Nicole CURATO",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/01442872.2015.1065965",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "298--313",
journal = "Policy Studies",
issn = "0144-2872",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Deliberative democratization: a framework for systemic analysis. / O'Flynn, I; CURATO, Nicole.

In: Policy Studies, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2015, p. 298-313.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deliberative democratization: a framework for systemic analysis

AU - O'Flynn, I

AU - CURATO, Nicole

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - In the transition literature, ‘free and fair elections’ is often treated as the most important indicator of democratic quality. In this paper, however, we argue that ‘free deliberation among equals’ is in many respects a more telling measure. On the face of it, this argument might strike one as implausible. After all, the decisive moment in many transitions is the signing of a pact between elements in the government and opposition who are more concerned to protect their own interests than to explain themselves to others. Yet while pacts may not be particularly deliberative, they still occasion a great deal of deliberation across society as a whole. We argue that the different sites where deliberation occurs can be understood as forming a deliberative system. To give substance to this idea, we then outline a systemic framework that may be used to describe and evaluate the deliberative capacity of transitional regimes. Finally, we turn to the cases of Venezuela and Poland to illustrate the empirical application of this approach. Both transitions were founded on a pact. Yet differences in the nature of those pacts and the broader deliberative systems in which they were located tell us a lot about where those countries are today.

AB - In the transition literature, ‘free and fair elections’ is often treated as the most important indicator of democratic quality. In this paper, however, we argue that ‘free deliberation among equals’ is in many respects a more telling measure. On the face of it, this argument might strike one as implausible. After all, the decisive moment in many transitions is the signing of a pact between elements in the government and opposition who are more concerned to protect their own interests than to explain themselves to others. Yet while pacts may not be particularly deliberative, they still occasion a great deal of deliberation across society as a whole. We argue that the different sites where deliberation occurs can be understood as forming a deliberative system. To give substance to this idea, we then outline a systemic framework that may be used to describe and evaluate the deliberative capacity of transitional regimes. Finally, we turn to the cases of Venezuela and Poland to illustrate the empirical application of this approach. Both transitions were founded on a pact. Yet differences in the nature of those pacts and the broader deliberative systems in which they were located tell us a lot about where those countries are today.

KW - Deliberative capacity

KW - Poland

KW - Venezuela

KW - deliberative system

KW - democratization

KW - pact

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940937048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/deliberative-democratization-framework-systemic-analysis

U2 - 10.1080/01442872.2015.1065965

DO - 10.1080/01442872.2015.1065965

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 298

EP - 313

JO - Policy Studies

JF - Policy Studies

SN - 0144-2872

IS - 3

ER -