Deliberative participation, environmental law and collaborative governance

Insights from surface and groundwater studies

Cameron Holley, Darren Sinclair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite major reforms in water management, many water resources are still over-exploited and under threat. Hard questions are accordingly being asked as to whether present legal and governance tools are providing adequate answers to Australia's pressing water problems. Of particular concern is the need to improve community engagement in water law and governance. Responding to these concerns, this article draws on 68 interviews and a survey of community and government stakeholders involved in three different collaborative decision-making processes designed to manage diffuse pollu- tion of local streams, dry land salinity and nutrient/sediment runoff, and groundwater overuse. The article explores and critically examines the internal dynamics of the decision-making processes, and provides a range of insights for policy and theory for designing meaningful and effective collaborative decision-making in the practice of governing water resources. The article also considers the implications of these collaborative approaches for our understanding of the modern regulatory state.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)32-55
Number of pages24
JournalEnvironmental and Planning Law Journal
Volume30
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

environmental law
decision making
governance
water
participation
groundwater
water resource
decision-making process
water management
stakeholder
resources
runoff
community
salinity
nutrient
threat
reform
sediment
Law
present

Cite this

@article{44f0d8e6df574334bd144542bfc06935,
title = "Deliberative participation, environmental law and collaborative governance: Insights from surface and groundwater studies",
abstract = "Despite major reforms in water management, many water resources are still over-exploited and under threat. Hard questions are accordingly being asked as to whether present legal and governance tools are providing adequate answers to Australia's pressing water problems. Of particular concern is the need to improve community engagement in water law and governance. Responding to these concerns, this article draws on 68 interviews and a survey of community and government stakeholders involved in three different collaborative decision-making processes designed to manage diffuse pollu- tion of local streams, dry land salinity and nutrient/sediment runoff, and groundwater overuse. The article explores and critically examines the internal dynamics of the decision-making processes, and provides a range of insights for policy and theory for designing meaningful and effective collaborative decision-making in the practice of governing water resources. The article also considers the implications of these collaborative approaches for our understanding of the modern regulatory state.",
author = "Cameron Holley and Darren Sinclair",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "32--55",
journal = "Environmental and Planning Law Journal",
issn = "0813-300X",
publisher = "Lawbook Co.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deliberative participation, environmental law and collaborative governance

T2 - Insights from surface and groundwater studies

AU - Holley, Cameron

AU - Sinclair, Darren

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Despite major reforms in water management, many water resources are still over-exploited and under threat. Hard questions are accordingly being asked as to whether present legal and governance tools are providing adequate answers to Australia's pressing water problems. Of particular concern is the need to improve community engagement in water law and governance. Responding to these concerns, this article draws on 68 interviews and a survey of community and government stakeholders involved in three different collaborative decision-making processes designed to manage diffuse pollu- tion of local streams, dry land salinity and nutrient/sediment runoff, and groundwater overuse. The article explores and critically examines the internal dynamics of the decision-making processes, and provides a range of insights for policy and theory for designing meaningful and effective collaborative decision-making in the practice of governing water resources. The article also considers the implications of these collaborative approaches for our understanding of the modern regulatory state.

AB - Despite major reforms in water management, many water resources are still over-exploited and under threat. Hard questions are accordingly being asked as to whether present legal and governance tools are providing adequate answers to Australia's pressing water problems. Of particular concern is the need to improve community engagement in water law and governance. Responding to these concerns, this article draws on 68 interviews and a survey of community and government stakeholders involved in three different collaborative decision-making processes designed to manage diffuse pollu- tion of local streams, dry land salinity and nutrient/sediment runoff, and groundwater overuse. The article explores and critically examines the internal dynamics of the decision-making processes, and provides a range of insights for policy and theory for designing meaningful and effective collaborative decision-making in the practice of governing water resources. The article also considers the implications of these collaborative approaches for our understanding of the modern regulatory state.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883791407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 32

EP - 55

JO - Environmental and Planning Law Journal

JF - Environmental and Planning Law Journal

SN - 0813-300X

IS - 1

ER -