Density estimation for small mammals from live trapping grids: rodents in northern Canada.

Charles KREBS, Rudy Boonstra, Scott Gilbert, Donald Reid, Alice Kenney, Elizabeth J. Hofer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Management agencies and quantitative ecologists need robust estimates of population density. The best way of converting population estimates of livetrapped small mammals to population density is not clear. We estimated population density on livetrapping grids with 4 estimators applied to 3 species of boreal forest and 3 species of tundra rodents to test for relative differences in density estimators. We used 2 spatial estimators proposed by Efford (2009) and 2 traditional boundary-strip estimators designed for grid livetrapping. We analyzed markâ¿¿recapture data from 104 trapping sessions from the boreal forest at Kluane, Yukon (n â¿¿=â¿¿ 4,818 individuals), and 56 trapping sessions from tundra areas of Herschel Island and Komakuk Beach in northern Yukon (n â¿¿=â¿¿ 1,327 individuals). For boreal forest rodents on average both boundary-strip methods produced density estimates larger than Efford's maximum-likelihood (ML) estimator by as much as 50% at all population densities up to 25 animals/ha. For tundra rodents both boundary-strip methods produced density estimates smaller than Efford's ML at low density (
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)974-981
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Mammalogy
Volume92
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

small mammal
Population Density
small mammals
rodent
Canada
trapping
Mammals
Rodentia
population density
tundra
Yukon Territory
rodents
boreal forests
boreal forest
ecologists
Islands
beaches
beach
animal
methodology

Cite this

KREBS, C., Boonstra, R., Gilbert, S., Reid, D., Kenney, A., & Hofer, E. J. (2011). Density estimation for small mammals from live trapping grids: rodents in northern Canada. Journal of Mammalogy, 92(5), 974-981. https://doi.org/10.1644/10-MAMM-A-313.1
KREBS, Charles ; Boonstra, Rudy ; Gilbert, Scott ; Reid, Donald ; Kenney, Alice ; Hofer, Elizabeth J. / Density estimation for small mammals from live trapping grids: rodents in northern Canada. In: Journal of Mammalogy. 2011 ; Vol. 92, No. 5. pp. 974-981.
@article{9ee5435a272e4596957fe995ad663a10,
title = "Density estimation for small mammals from live trapping grids: rodents in northern Canada.",
abstract = "Management agencies and quantitative ecologists need robust estimates of population density. The best way of converting population estimates of livetrapped small mammals to population density is not clear. We estimated population density on livetrapping grids with 4 estimators applied to 3 species of boreal forest and 3 species of tundra rodents to test for relative differences in density estimators. We used 2 spatial estimators proposed by Efford (2009) and 2 traditional boundary-strip estimators designed for grid livetrapping. We analyzed mark{\^a}¿¿recapture data from 104 trapping sessions from the boreal forest at Kluane, Yukon (n {\^a}¿¿={\^a}¿¿ 4,818 individuals), and 56 trapping sessions from tundra areas of Herschel Island and Komakuk Beach in northern Yukon (n {\^a}¿¿={\^a}¿¿ 1,327 individuals). For boreal forest rodents on average both boundary-strip methods produced density estimates larger than Efford's maximum-likelihood (ML) estimator by as much as 50{\%} at all population densities up to 25 animals/ha. For tundra rodents both boundary-strip methods produced density estimates smaller than Efford's ML at low density (",
keywords = "DENSITY 4, density estimation, Dicrostonyx groenlandicus, Lemmus sibiricus, Microtus, Myodes rutilus, Peromyscus maniculatus, Yukon",
author = "Charles KREBS and Rudy Boonstra and Scott Gilbert and Donald Reid and Alice Kenney and Hofer, {Elizabeth J.}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1644/10-MAMM-A-313.1",
language = "English",
volume = "92",
pages = "974--981",
journal = "Journal of Mammalogy",
issn = "0022-2372",
publisher = "Allen Press Inc.",
number = "5",

}

KREBS, C, Boonstra, R, Gilbert, S, Reid, D, Kenney, A & Hofer, EJ 2011, 'Density estimation for small mammals from live trapping grids: rodents in northern Canada.', Journal of Mammalogy, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 974-981. https://doi.org/10.1644/10-MAMM-A-313.1

Density estimation for small mammals from live trapping grids: rodents in northern Canada. / KREBS, Charles; Boonstra, Rudy; Gilbert, Scott; Reid, Donald; Kenney, Alice; Hofer, Elizabeth J.

In: Journal of Mammalogy, Vol. 92, No. 5, 2011, p. 974-981.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Density estimation for small mammals from live trapping grids: rodents in northern Canada.

AU - KREBS, Charles

AU - Boonstra, Rudy

AU - Gilbert, Scott

AU - Reid, Donald

AU - Kenney, Alice

AU - Hofer, Elizabeth J.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Management agencies and quantitative ecologists need robust estimates of population density. The best way of converting population estimates of livetrapped small mammals to population density is not clear. We estimated population density on livetrapping grids with 4 estimators applied to 3 species of boreal forest and 3 species of tundra rodents to test for relative differences in density estimators. We used 2 spatial estimators proposed by Efford (2009) and 2 traditional boundary-strip estimators designed for grid livetrapping. We analyzed markâ¿¿recapture data from 104 trapping sessions from the boreal forest at Kluane, Yukon (n â¿¿=â¿¿ 4,818 individuals), and 56 trapping sessions from tundra areas of Herschel Island and Komakuk Beach in northern Yukon (n â¿¿=â¿¿ 1,327 individuals). For boreal forest rodents on average both boundary-strip methods produced density estimates larger than Efford's maximum-likelihood (ML) estimator by as much as 50% at all population densities up to 25 animals/ha. For tundra rodents both boundary-strip methods produced density estimates smaller than Efford's ML at low density (

AB - Management agencies and quantitative ecologists need robust estimates of population density. The best way of converting population estimates of livetrapped small mammals to population density is not clear. We estimated population density on livetrapping grids with 4 estimators applied to 3 species of boreal forest and 3 species of tundra rodents to test for relative differences in density estimators. We used 2 spatial estimators proposed by Efford (2009) and 2 traditional boundary-strip estimators designed for grid livetrapping. We analyzed markâ¿¿recapture data from 104 trapping sessions from the boreal forest at Kluane, Yukon (n â¿¿=â¿¿ 4,818 individuals), and 56 trapping sessions from tundra areas of Herschel Island and Komakuk Beach in northern Yukon (n â¿¿=â¿¿ 1,327 individuals). For boreal forest rodents on average both boundary-strip methods produced density estimates larger than Efford's maximum-likelihood (ML) estimator by as much as 50% at all population densities up to 25 animals/ha. For tundra rodents both boundary-strip methods produced density estimates smaller than Efford's ML at low density (

KW - DENSITY 4

KW - density estimation

KW - Dicrostonyx groenlandicus

KW - Lemmus sibiricus

KW - Microtus

KW - Myodes rutilus

KW - Peromyscus maniculatus

KW - Yukon

U2 - 10.1644/10-MAMM-A-313.1

DO - 10.1644/10-MAMM-A-313.1

M3 - Article

VL - 92

SP - 974

EP - 981

JO - Journal of Mammalogy

JF - Journal of Mammalogy

SN - 0022-2372

IS - 5

ER -