Developing Standards for X-ray examination systems

Dudley CREAGH, Nenad Blagejovic

Research output: Contribution to conference (non-published works)Other

Abstract

Airline passengers know that X-ray examination systems are used at airports to examine their baggage. They will have seen their hand baggage being examined and may be aware that their hold baggage will have been examined as well. By international regulation all air cargo is examined. Because the threat of terrorist attack is ever present equipment is continually evolving to counteract potential acts by terrorists. But the test standards which are used to assess the performance of X-ray systems were created twenty years ago when border customs agents were searching solely for contraband. The esisting standards do not contain test objects which relate to the materials which may be used in Improvised Explosive Devices. Currently Creagh is involved in efforts to upgrade the existing standard ASTM F792-01 standard suitcase to redress this issue. It is essential the any airline standard has an excellent capability for materials discrimination (MD) The ancillary technique used at the passenger portal is an ion mobility spectrometer. Spectroscopy techniques such as this, and IR and Raman spectroscopy, are essentially surface techniques. They cannot test the contents of liquids, aerosols and gels (LAGS) contained in bottles and cans. And operators are not permitted by regulation to open any closed container. But X-ray techniques with MD capability can give images which show what is inside containers, and assess whether the contents are benign or dangerous. For air cargo systems no standard existed at the time when a major study on the detection of IEDs is air cargo was undertaken. During this project a prototype of a system was developed. This has been patented [1]. Standards for the testing of X-ray examination systems must contain objects which test: wire resolution, wire resolution behind an object, spatial resolution, penetration, contrast resolution, and the discrimination between materials (un-screened and screened by an object). The standards must be able to be used with X-ray sources of all types (constant potential, switched potential, LINAC and radio-isotope), with all possible transport systems of the object through the examination tunnel, and every means of photon detection. As well they have to be easy to use, providing a rapid evaluation of system performance with only one pass of the object through the tunnel for each source direction. Modern systems may contain as many as four X-ray sources. Materials can be characterized by their effective atomic number Zeff and density [2]. Zeff is derived by calculation and verified by testing in using data from the transmitted beam taken at different X-ray energies for the same density and thickness value of the test material. This paper will focus on the materials discrimination aspect of the testing process, in particular for LAGS testing at the passenger portal. We are members of an international committee being formed to create a new standard for this. As well we will demonstrate the ability of the Australian Image Quality Test Piece (AIQT) to give materials discrimination information. An existing standard (ANSI N42.46) cannot do this. And it takes 4 hours for a complete test. The AIQT produces all the information in one pass through the X-ray tunnel (6 minutes maximum). References [1] Creagh DC, Blagejovic, N. (2009). PCT/AU2009/000820. A new system for the evaluation of the performance of medium- and large- tunnel X-ray examination systems. [2] Smith JA, Martz HE, Kallman JS. (2014) Case for an improved effective-atomic-number for the electronic baggage screening program.LLNL-TR-520312. [3] Snyder M, Bell C. (2013). Test and evaluation report for the assessment of the Australian Image Quality Test for palletised cargo X-ray systems. DHS/ST/TSL-13/133
Original languageEnglish
Pages1-1
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - 2014
EventAustralian Institute of Physics Congress 2014: The Art of Physics - Canberra, Canberra, Australia
Duration: 7 Dec 201411 Dec 2014

Conference

ConferenceAustralian Institute of Physics Congress 2014: The Art of Physics
CountryAustralia
CityCanberra
Period7/12/1411/12/14

Fingerprint

X rays
Tunnels
Image quality
Testing
Aerosols
Containers
Ion mobility spectrometers
Gels
Air
Wire
Bottles
Liquids
Airports
Isotopes
Raman spectroscopy
Infrared spectroscopy
Screening
Photons
Spectroscopy

Cite this

CREAGH, D., & Blagejovic, N. (2014). Developing Standards for X-ray examination systems. 1-1. Australian Institute of Physics Congress 2014: The Art of Physics, Canberra, Australia.
CREAGH, Dudley ; Blagejovic, Nenad. / Developing Standards for X-ray examination systems. Australian Institute of Physics Congress 2014: The Art of Physics, Canberra, Australia.1 p.
@conference{12ffea9294774a22b997ab14e401a7f9,
title = "Developing Standards for X-ray examination systems",
abstract = "Airline passengers know that X-ray examination systems are used at airports to examine their baggage. They will have seen their hand baggage being examined and may be aware that their hold baggage will have been examined as well. By international regulation all air cargo is examined. Because the threat of terrorist attack is ever present equipment is continually evolving to counteract potential acts by terrorists. But the test standards which are used to assess the performance of X-ray systems were created twenty years ago when border customs agents were searching solely for contraband. The esisting standards do not contain test objects which relate to the materials which may be used in Improvised Explosive Devices. Currently Creagh is involved in efforts to upgrade the existing standard ASTM F792-01 standard suitcase to redress this issue. It is essential the any airline standard has an excellent capability for materials discrimination (MD) The ancillary technique used at the passenger portal is an ion mobility spectrometer. Spectroscopy techniques such as this, and IR and Raman spectroscopy, are essentially surface techniques. They cannot test the contents of liquids, aerosols and gels (LAGS) contained in bottles and cans. And operators are not permitted by regulation to open any closed container. But X-ray techniques with MD capability can give images which show what is inside containers, and assess whether the contents are benign or dangerous. For air cargo systems no standard existed at the time when a major study on the detection of IEDs is air cargo was undertaken. During this project a prototype of a system was developed. This has been patented [1]. Standards for the testing of X-ray examination systems must contain objects which test: wire resolution, wire resolution behind an object, spatial resolution, penetration, contrast resolution, and the discrimination between materials (un-screened and screened by an object). The standards must be able to be used with X-ray sources of all types (constant potential, switched potential, LINAC and radio-isotope), with all possible transport systems of the object through the examination tunnel, and every means of photon detection. As well they have to be easy to use, providing a rapid evaluation of system performance with only one pass of the object through the tunnel for each source direction. Modern systems may contain as many as four X-ray sources. Materials can be characterized by their effective atomic number Zeff and density [2]. Zeff is derived by calculation and verified by testing in using data from the transmitted beam taken at different X-ray energies for the same density and thickness value of the test material. This paper will focus on the materials discrimination aspect of the testing process, in particular for LAGS testing at the passenger portal. We are members of an international committee being formed to create a new standard for this. As well we will demonstrate the ability of the Australian Image Quality Test Piece (AIQT) to give materials discrimination information. An existing standard (ANSI N42.46) cannot do this. And it takes 4 hours for a complete test. The AIQT produces all the information in one pass through the X-ray tunnel (6 minutes maximum). References [1] Creagh DC, Blagejovic, N. (2009). PCT/AU2009/000820. A new system for the evaluation of the performance of medium- and large- tunnel X-ray examination systems. [2] Smith JA, Martz HE, Kallman JS. (2014) Case for an improved effective-atomic-number for the electronic baggage screening program.LLNL-TR-520312. [3] Snyder M, Bell C. (2013). Test and evaluation report for the assessment of the Australian Image Quality Test for palletised cargo X-ray systems. DHS/ST/TSL-13/133",
keywords = "Border protection, X-ray standards, airport security",
author = "Dudley CREAGH and Nenad Blagejovic",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
pages = "1--1",
note = "Australian Institute of Physics Congress 2014: The Art of Physics ; Conference date: 07-12-2014 Through 11-12-2014",

}

CREAGH, D & Blagejovic, N 2014, 'Developing Standards for X-ray examination systems' Australian Institute of Physics Congress 2014: The Art of Physics, Canberra, Australia, 7/12/14 - 11/12/14, pp. 1-1.

Developing Standards for X-ray examination systems. / CREAGH, Dudley; Blagejovic, Nenad.

2014. 1-1 Australian Institute of Physics Congress 2014: The Art of Physics, Canberra, Australia.

Research output: Contribution to conference (non-published works)Other

TY - CONF

T1 - Developing Standards for X-ray examination systems

AU - CREAGH, Dudley

AU - Blagejovic, Nenad

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Airline passengers know that X-ray examination systems are used at airports to examine their baggage. They will have seen their hand baggage being examined and may be aware that their hold baggage will have been examined as well. By international regulation all air cargo is examined. Because the threat of terrorist attack is ever present equipment is continually evolving to counteract potential acts by terrorists. But the test standards which are used to assess the performance of X-ray systems were created twenty years ago when border customs agents were searching solely for contraband. The esisting standards do not contain test objects which relate to the materials which may be used in Improvised Explosive Devices. Currently Creagh is involved in efforts to upgrade the existing standard ASTM F792-01 standard suitcase to redress this issue. It is essential the any airline standard has an excellent capability for materials discrimination (MD) The ancillary technique used at the passenger portal is an ion mobility spectrometer. Spectroscopy techniques such as this, and IR and Raman spectroscopy, are essentially surface techniques. They cannot test the contents of liquids, aerosols and gels (LAGS) contained in bottles and cans. And operators are not permitted by regulation to open any closed container. But X-ray techniques with MD capability can give images which show what is inside containers, and assess whether the contents are benign or dangerous. For air cargo systems no standard existed at the time when a major study on the detection of IEDs is air cargo was undertaken. During this project a prototype of a system was developed. This has been patented [1]. Standards for the testing of X-ray examination systems must contain objects which test: wire resolution, wire resolution behind an object, spatial resolution, penetration, contrast resolution, and the discrimination between materials (un-screened and screened by an object). The standards must be able to be used with X-ray sources of all types (constant potential, switched potential, LINAC and radio-isotope), with all possible transport systems of the object through the examination tunnel, and every means of photon detection. As well they have to be easy to use, providing a rapid evaluation of system performance with only one pass of the object through the tunnel for each source direction. Modern systems may contain as many as four X-ray sources. Materials can be characterized by their effective atomic number Zeff and density [2]. Zeff is derived by calculation and verified by testing in using data from the transmitted beam taken at different X-ray energies for the same density and thickness value of the test material. This paper will focus on the materials discrimination aspect of the testing process, in particular for LAGS testing at the passenger portal. We are members of an international committee being formed to create a new standard for this. As well we will demonstrate the ability of the Australian Image Quality Test Piece (AIQT) to give materials discrimination information. An existing standard (ANSI N42.46) cannot do this. And it takes 4 hours for a complete test. The AIQT produces all the information in one pass through the X-ray tunnel (6 minutes maximum). References [1] Creagh DC, Blagejovic, N. (2009). PCT/AU2009/000820. A new system for the evaluation of the performance of medium- and large- tunnel X-ray examination systems. [2] Smith JA, Martz HE, Kallman JS. (2014) Case for an improved effective-atomic-number for the electronic baggage screening program.LLNL-TR-520312. [3] Snyder M, Bell C. (2013). Test and evaluation report for the assessment of the Australian Image Quality Test for palletised cargo X-ray systems. DHS/ST/TSL-13/133

AB - Airline passengers know that X-ray examination systems are used at airports to examine their baggage. They will have seen their hand baggage being examined and may be aware that their hold baggage will have been examined as well. By international regulation all air cargo is examined. Because the threat of terrorist attack is ever present equipment is continually evolving to counteract potential acts by terrorists. But the test standards which are used to assess the performance of X-ray systems were created twenty years ago when border customs agents were searching solely for contraband. The esisting standards do not contain test objects which relate to the materials which may be used in Improvised Explosive Devices. Currently Creagh is involved in efforts to upgrade the existing standard ASTM F792-01 standard suitcase to redress this issue. It is essential the any airline standard has an excellent capability for materials discrimination (MD) The ancillary technique used at the passenger portal is an ion mobility spectrometer. Spectroscopy techniques such as this, and IR and Raman spectroscopy, are essentially surface techniques. They cannot test the contents of liquids, aerosols and gels (LAGS) contained in bottles and cans. And operators are not permitted by regulation to open any closed container. But X-ray techniques with MD capability can give images which show what is inside containers, and assess whether the contents are benign or dangerous. For air cargo systems no standard existed at the time when a major study on the detection of IEDs is air cargo was undertaken. During this project a prototype of a system was developed. This has been patented [1]. Standards for the testing of X-ray examination systems must contain objects which test: wire resolution, wire resolution behind an object, spatial resolution, penetration, contrast resolution, and the discrimination between materials (un-screened and screened by an object). The standards must be able to be used with X-ray sources of all types (constant potential, switched potential, LINAC and radio-isotope), with all possible transport systems of the object through the examination tunnel, and every means of photon detection. As well they have to be easy to use, providing a rapid evaluation of system performance with only one pass of the object through the tunnel for each source direction. Modern systems may contain as many as four X-ray sources. Materials can be characterized by their effective atomic number Zeff and density [2]. Zeff is derived by calculation and verified by testing in using data from the transmitted beam taken at different X-ray energies for the same density and thickness value of the test material. This paper will focus on the materials discrimination aspect of the testing process, in particular for LAGS testing at the passenger portal. We are members of an international committee being formed to create a new standard for this. As well we will demonstrate the ability of the Australian Image Quality Test Piece (AIQT) to give materials discrimination information. An existing standard (ANSI N42.46) cannot do this. And it takes 4 hours for a complete test. The AIQT produces all the information in one pass through the X-ray tunnel (6 minutes maximum). References [1] Creagh DC, Blagejovic, N. (2009). PCT/AU2009/000820. A new system for the evaluation of the performance of medium- and large- tunnel X-ray examination systems. [2] Smith JA, Martz HE, Kallman JS. (2014) Case for an improved effective-atomic-number for the electronic baggage screening program.LLNL-TR-520312. [3] Snyder M, Bell C. (2013). Test and evaluation report for the assessment of the Australian Image Quality Test for palletised cargo X-ray systems. DHS/ST/TSL-13/133

KW - Border protection

KW - X-ray standards

KW - airport security

M3 - Other

SP - 1

EP - 1

ER -

CREAGH D, Blagejovic N. Developing Standards for X-ray examination systems. 2014. Australian Institute of Physics Congress 2014: The Art of Physics, Canberra, Australia.