TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and Initial Validation of an Acute Readiness Monitoring Scale in Military Personnel
AU - Keegan, Richard James
AU - Flood, Andrew
AU - Niyonsenga, Theo
AU - Welvaert, Marijke
AU - Rattray, Ben
AU - Sarkar, Mustafa
AU - Melberzs, Lee
AU - Crone, David
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by a grant from Defence Science Technology, Australia, as part of the ?Human Performance Research Network? (?HPRnet? ? Award ID: 2016000167).
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2021 Keegan, Flood, Niyonsenga, Welvaert, Rattray, Sarkar, Melberzs and Crone.
PY - 2021/11/18
Y1 - 2021/11/18
N2 - Personnel in many professions must remain “ready” to perform diverse activities. Managing individual and collective capability is a common concern for leadership and decision makers. Typical existing approaches for monitoring readiness involve keeping detailed records of training, health and equipment maintenance, or – less commonly – data from wearable devices that can be difficult to interpret as well as raising privacy concerns. A widely applicable, simple psychometric measure of perceived readiness would be invaluable in generating rapid evaluations of current capability directly from personnel. To develop this measure, we conducted exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis with a sample of 770 Australian military personnel. The 32-item Acute Readiness Monitoring Scale (ARMS) demonstrated good model fit, and comprised nine factors: overall readiness; physical readiness; physical fatigue; cognitive readiness; cognitive fatigue; threat-challenge (i.e., emotional/coping) readiness; skills-and-training readiness; group-team readiness, and equipment readiness. Readiness factors were negatively correlated with recent stress, current negative affect and distress, and positively correlated with resilience, wellbeing, current positive affect and a supervisor’s rating of solider readiness. The development of the ARMS facilitates a range of new research opportunities: enabling quick, simple and easily interpreted assessment of individual and group readiness.
AB - Personnel in many professions must remain “ready” to perform diverse activities. Managing individual and collective capability is a common concern for leadership and decision makers. Typical existing approaches for monitoring readiness involve keeping detailed records of training, health and equipment maintenance, or – less commonly – data from wearable devices that can be difficult to interpret as well as raising privacy concerns. A widely applicable, simple psychometric measure of perceived readiness would be invaluable in generating rapid evaluations of current capability directly from personnel. To develop this measure, we conducted exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis with a sample of 770 Australian military personnel. The 32-item Acute Readiness Monitoring Scale (ARMS) demonstrated good model fit, and comprised nine factors: overall readiness; physical readiness; physical fatigue; cognitive readiness; cognitive fatigue; threat-challenge (i.e., emotional/coping) readiness; skills-and-training readiness; group-team readiness, and equipment readiness. Readiness factors were negatively correlated with recent stress, current negative affect and distress, and positively correlated with resilience, wellbeing, current positive affect and a supervisor’s rating of solider readiness. The development of the ARMS facilitates a range of new research opportunities: enabling quick, simple and easily interpreted assessment of individual and group readiness.
KW - fatigue
KW - job design/work characteristics/empowerment
KW - job performance/performance measurement
KW - monitoring
KW - mood
KW - psychometrics/measurement
KW - subjective ratings
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120484973&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.738609
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.738609
M3 - Article
C2 - 34867619
SN - 1664-1078
VL - 12
SP - 1
EP - 18
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
M1 - 738609
ER -