Development and Initial Validation of an Acute Readiness Monitoring Scale in Military Personnel

Richard James Keegan, Andrew Flood, Theo Niyonsenga, Marijke Welvaert, Ben Rattray, Mustafa Sarkar, Lee Melberzs, David Crone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
68 Downloads (Pure)


Personnel in many professions must remain “ready” to perform diverse activities. Managing individual and collective capability is a common concern for leadership and decision makers. Typical existing approaches for monitoring readiness involve keeping detailed records of training, health and equipment maintenance, or – less commonly – data from wearable devices that can be difficult to interpret as well as raising privacy concerns. A widely applicable, simple psychometric measure of perceived readiness would be invaluable in generating rapid evaluations of current capability directly from personnel. To develop this measure, we conducted exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis with a sample of 770 Australian military personnel. The 32-item Acute Readiness Monitoring Scale (ARMS) demonstrated good model fit, and comprised nine factors: overall readiness; physical readiness; physical fatigue; cognitive readiness; cognitive fatigue; threat-challenge (i.e., emotional/coping) readiness; skills-and-training readiness; group-team readiness, and equipment readiness. Readiness factors were negatively correlated with recent stress, current negative affect and distress, and positively correlated with resilience, wellbeing, current positive affect and a supervisor’s rating of solider readiness. The development of the ARMS facilitates a range of new research opportunities: enabling quick, simple and easily interpreted assessment of individual and group readiness.

Original languageEnglish
Article number738609
Pages (from-to)1-18
Number of pages18
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Publication statusPublished - 18 Nov 2021


Dive into the research topics of 'Development and Initial Validation of an Acute Readiness Monitoring Scale in Military Personnel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this