Development and initial validation of the interprofessional team learning profiling questionnaire

Gillian Nisbet, Stewart Dunn, Michelle Lincoln, Joanne Shaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Informal workplace interprofessional learning occurs as health professionals interact with each other as part of everyday work practice. Participation in interprofessional team meetings is a practical way to foster learning. However, a gap exists in the availability of a reliable and valid instrument that adequately captures the nuances of informal workplace interprofessional learning in this setting. The purpose of this study was to develop a questionnaire to measure the different components of interprofessional learning that contribute to the quality of interprofessional learning within the interprofessional team meeting. Questionnaire items were developed from a review of the literature and interviews with health professionals. Exploratory factor analysis was used to determine the underlying factor structure. Two hundred and eighty-five health professionals completed a 98-item questionnaire. After elimination of unreliable items, the remaining items (n = 41) loaded onto four factors named personal and professional capacity; turning words into action—“walk the talk”; the rhetoric of interprofessional learning—“talk the talk”; and inclusiveness. Internal consistency was high for all sub-scales (Cronbach’s alpha 0.91, 0.87, 0.83, and 0.83, respectively). Content, construct, and concurrent validity were assessed. The instrument developed in this study indicated consistency and robust psychometric properties. Future studies that further test the psychometric properties of the questionnaire will help to establish the usefulness of this measure in establishing evidence for the perceived effectiveness of interprofessional learning in a healthcare setting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)278-287
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Interprofessional Care
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 May 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Learning
Psychometrics
Workplace
Health
Statistical Factor Analysis
Surveys and Questionnaires
Interviews
Delivery of Health Care

Cite this

@article{a2484e6b451841aca2a0771cf3095c25,
title = "Development and initial validation of the interprofessional team learning profiling questionnaire",
abstract = "Informal workplace interprofessional learning occurs as health professionals interact with each other as part of everyday work practice. Participation in interprofessional team meetings is a practical way to foster learning. However, a gap exists in the availability of a reliable and valid instrument that adequately captures the nuances of informal workplace interprofessional learning in this setting. The purpose of this study was to develop a questionnaire to measure the different components of interprofessional learning that contribute to the quality of interprofessional learning within the interprofessional team meeting. Questionnaire items were developed from a review of the literature and interviews with health professionals. Exploratory factor analysis was used to determine the underlying factor structure. Two hundred and eighty-five health professionals completed a 98-item questionnaire. After elimination of unreliable items, the remaining items (n = 41) loaded onto four factors named personal and professional capacity; turning words into action—“walk the talk”; the rhetoric of interprofessional learning—“talk the talk”; and inclusiveness. Internal consistency was high for all sub-scales (Cronbach’s alpha 0.91, 0.87, 0.83, and 0.83, respectively). Content, construct, and concurrent validity were assessed. The instrument developed in this study indicated consistency and robust psychometric properties. Future studies that further test the psychometric properties of the questionnaire will help to establish the usefulness of this measure in establishing evidence for the perceived effectiveness of interprofessional learning in a healthcare setting.",
keywords = "Collective learning, interprofessional learning, questionnaire designs, statistics, work-based learning",
author = "Gillian Nisbet and Stewart Dunn and Michelle Lincoln and Joanne Shaw",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "3",
doi = "10.3109/13561820.2016.1141188",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "278--287",
journal = "Holistic Medicine",
issn = "1356-1820",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "3",

}

Development and initial validation of the interprofessional team learning profiling questionnaire. / Nisbet, Gillian; Dunn, Stewart; Lincoln, Michelle; Shaw, Joanne.

In: Journal of Interprofessional Care, Vol. 30, No. 3, 03.05.2016, p. 278-287.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and initial validation of the interprofessional team learning profiling questionnaire

AU - Nisbet, Gillian

AU - Dunn, Stewart

AU - Lincoln, Michelle

AU - Shaw, Joanne

PY - 2016/5/3

Y1 - 2016/5/3

N2 - Informal workplace interprofessional learning occurs as health professionals interact with each other as part of everyday work practice. Participation in interprofessional team meetings is a practical way to foster learning. However, a gap exists in the availability of a reliable and valid instrument that adequately captures the nuances of informal workplace interprofessional learning in this setting. The purpose of this study was to develop a questionnaire to measure the different components of interprofessional learning that contribute to the quality of interprofessional learning within the interprofessional team meeting. Questionnaire items were developed from a review of the literature and interviews with health professionals. Exploratory factor analysis was used to determine the underlying factor structure. Two hundred and eighty-five health professionals completed a 98-item questionnaire. After elimination of unreliable items, the remaining items (n = 41) loaded onto four factors named personal and professional capacity; turning words into action—“walk the talk”; the rhetoric of interprofessional learning—“talk the talk”; and inclusiveness. Internal consistency was high for all sub-scales (Cronbach’s alpha 0.91, 0.87, 0.83, and 0.83, respectively). Content, construct, and concurrent validity were assessed. The instrument developed in this study indicated consistency and robust psychometric properties. Future studies that further test the psychometric properties of the questionnaire will help to establish the usefulness of this measure in establishing evidence for the perceived effectiveness of interprofessional learning in a healthcare setting.

AB - Informal workplace interprofessional learning occurs as health professionals interact with each other as part of everyday work practice. Participation in interprofessional team meetings is a practical way to foster learning. However, a gap exists in the availability of a reliable and valid instrument that adequately captures the nuances of informal workplace interprofessional learning in this setting. The purpose of this study was to develop a questionnaire to measure the different components of interprofessional learning that contribute to the quality of interprofessional learning within the interprofessional team meeting. Questionnaire items were developed from a review of the literature and interviews with health professionals. Exploratory factor analysis was used to determine the underlying factor structure. Two hundred and eighty-five health professionals completed a 98-item questionnaire. After elimination of unreliable items, the remaining items (n = 41) loaded onto four factors named personal and professional capacity; turning words into action—“walk the talk”; the rhetoric of interprofessional learning—“talk the talk”; and inclusiveness. Internal consistency was high for all sub-scales (Cronbach’s alpha 0.91, 0.87, 0.83, and 0.83, respectively). Content, construct, and concurrent validity were assessed. The instrument developed in this study indicated consistency and robust psychometric properties. Future studies that further test the psychometric properties of the questionnaire will help to establish the usefulness of this measure in establishing evidence for the perceived effectiveness of interprofessional learning in a healthcare setting.

KW - Collective learning

KW - interprofessional learning

KW - questionnaire designs

KW - statistics

KW - work-based learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969951556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/13561820.2016.1141188

DO - 10.3109/13561820.2016.1141188

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 278

EP - 287

JO - Holistic Medicine

JF - Holistic Medicine

SN - 1356-1820

IS - 3

ER -