Development of nutrition science competencies for undergraduate degrees in Australia

Tanya LAWLIS, Susan Torres, Alison Coates, Karin Clark, Karen Charlton, Andrew Sinclair, Lisa G. Wood, Amanda Devine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The need for updated competencies for nutrition scientists in Australia was identified. The aim of this paper is to describe the process of revising of these competencies for undergraduate nutrition science degrees in Australia. Methods and Study Design: An iterative multiple methods approach comprising three stages was undertaken: 1. Scoping study of existing competencies; 2. Exploratory survey; and, 3. Modified Delphi process (2 rounds) involving 128 nutrition experts from industry, community, government and academia. A ≥70% consensus rule was applied to Rounds 1 and 2 of the Delphi process in order to arrive at a final list of competencies. Results: Stage 1: Scoping study resulted in an initial list of 71 competency statements, categorised under six core areas. Stage 2: Exploratory survey-completed by 74 Nutrition Society of Australia (NSA) members; 76% agreed there was a need to update the current competencies. Standards were refined to six core areas and 36 statements. Stage 3: Modified Delphi process-revised competencies comprise five core competency areas, underpinned by fundamental knowledge, skills, attitudes and values: Nutrition Science; Food and the Food System; Nutrition Governance, Sociocultural and Behavioural Factors; Nutrition Research and Critical Analysis; and Communication and Professional Conduct; and three specialist competency areas: Food Science; Public Health Nutrition; and Animal Nutrition. Conclusions: The revised competencies provide an updated framework of nutrition science knowledge for graduates to effectively practice in Australia. They may be used to benchmark current and future nutrition science degrees and lead to improved employability skills of nutrition science graduates.
LanguageEnglish
Pages166-176
Number of pages11
JournalAsia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Nutritional Sciences
Benchmarking
Food
Food Technology
Consensus
Industry
Public Health
Communication
Research

Cite this

LAWLIS, Tanya ; Torres, Susan ; Coates, Alison ; Clark, Karin ; Charlton, Karen ; Sinclair, Andrew ; Wood, Lisa G. ; Devine, Amanda. / Development of nutrition science competencies for undergraduate degrees in Australia. In: Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2019 ; Vol. 28, No. 1. pp. 166-176.
@article{8e164b4b4c2f4226b35495d197cb3426,
title = "Development of nutrition science competencies for undergraduate degrees in Australia",
abstract = "Background and Objectives: The need for updated competencies for nutrition scientists in Australia was identified. The aim of this paper is to describe the process of revising of these competencies for undergraduate nutrition science degrees in Australia. Methods and Study Design: An iterative multiple methods approach comprising three stages was undertaken: 1. Scoping study of existing competencies; 2. Exploratory survey; and, 3. Modified Delphi process (2 rounds) involving 128 nutrition experts from industry, community, government and academia. A ≥70{\%} consensus rule was applied to Rounds 1 and 2 of the Delphi process in order to arrive at a final list of competencies. Results: Stage 1: Scoping study resulted in an initial list of 71 competency statements, categorised under six core areas. Stage 2: Exploratory survey-completed by 74 Nutrition Society of Australia (NSA) members; 76{\%} agreed there was a need to update the current competencies. Standards were refined to six core areas and 36 statements. Stage 3: Modified Delphi process-revised competencies comprise five core competency areas, underpinned by fundamental knowledge, skills, attitudes and values: Nutrition Science; Food and the Food System; Nutrition Governance, Sociocultural and Behavioural Factors; Nutrition Research and Critical Analysis; and Communication and Professional Conduct; and three specialist competency areas: Food Science; Public Health Nutrition; and Animal Nutrition. Conclusions: The revised competencies provide an updated framework of nutrition science knowledge for graduates to effectively practice in Australia. They may be used to benchmark current and future nutrition science degrees and lead to improved employability skills of nutrition science graduates.",
keywords = "competency, workforce development, delphi, nutrition science",
author = "Tanya LAWLIS and Susan Torres and Alison Coates and Karin Clark and Karen Charlton and Andrew Sinclair and Wood, {Lisa G.} and Amanda Devine",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.6133/apjcn.201903_28(1).0022",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "166--176",
journal = "Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition",
issn = "0964-7058",
publisher = "HEC Press",
number = "1",

}

LAWLIS, T, Torres, S, Coates, A, Clark, K, Charlton, K, Sinclair, A, Wood, LG & Devine, A 2019, 'Development of nutrition science competencies for undergraduate degrees in Australia', Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 166-176. https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.201903_28(1).0022

Development of nutrition science competencies for undergraduate degrees in Australia. / LAWLIS, Tanya; Torres, Susan; Coates, Alison; Clark, Karin; Charlton, Karen; Sinclair, Andrew; Wood, Lisa G.; Devine, Amanda.

In: Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2019, p. 166-176.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of nutrition science competencies for undergraduate degrees in Australia

AU - LAWLIS, Tanya

AU - Torres, Susan

AU - Coates, Alison

AU - Clark, Karin

AU - Charlton, Karen

AU - Sinclair, Andrew

AU - Wood, Lisa G.

AU - Devine, Amanda

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Background and Objectives: The need for updated competencies for nutrition scientists in Australia was identified. The aim of this paper is to describe the process of revising of these competencies for undergraduate nutrition science degrees in Australia. Methods and Study Design: An iterative multiple methods approach comprising three stages was undertaken: 1. Scoping study of existing competencies; 2. Exploratory survey; and, 3. Modified Delphi process (2 rounds) involving 128 nutrition experts from industry, community, government and academia. A ≥70% consensus rule was applied to Rounds 1 and 2 of the Delphi process in order to arrive at a final list of competencies. Results: Stage 1: Scoping study resulted in an initial list of 71 competency statements, categorised under six core areas. Stage 2: Exploratory survey-completed by 74 Nutrition Society of Australia (NSA) members; 76% agreed there was a need to update the current competencies. Standards were refined to six core areas and 36 statements. Stage 3: Modified Delphi process-revised competencies comprise five core competency areas, underpinned by fundamental knowledge, skills, attitudes and values: Nutrition Science; Food and the Food System; Nutrition Governance, Sociocultural and Behavioural Factors; Nutrition Research and Critical Analysis; and Communication and Professional Conduct; and three specialist competency areas: Food Science; Public Health Nutrition; and Animal Nutrition. Conclusions: The revised competencies provide an updated framework of nutrition science knowledge for graduates to effectively practice in Australia. They may be used to benchmark current and future nutrition science degrees and lead to improved employability skills of nutrition science graduates.

AB - Background and Objectives: The need for updated competencies for nutrition scientists in Australia was identified. The aim of this paper is to describe the process of revising of these competencies for undergraduate nutrition science degrees in Australia. Methods and Study Design: An iterative multiple methods approach comprising three stages was undertaken: 1. Scoping study of existing competencies; 2. Exploratory survey; and, 3. Modified Delphi process (2 rounds) involving 128 nutrition experts from industry, community, government and academia. A ≥70% consensus rule was applied to Rounds 1 and 2 of the Delphi process in order to arrive at a final list of competencies. Results: Stage 1: Scoping study resulted in an initial list of 71 competency statements, categorised under six core areas. Stage 2: Exploratory survey-completed by 74 Nutrition Society of Australia (NSA) members; 76% agreed there was a need to update the current competencies. Standards were refined to six core areas and 36 statements. Stage 3: Modified Delphi process-revised competencies comprise five core competency areas, underpinned by fundamental knowledge, skills, attitudes and values: Nutrition Science; Food and the Food System; Nutrition Governance, Sociocultural and Behavioural Factors; Nutrition Research and Critical Analysis; and Communication and Professional Conduct; and three specialist competency areas: Food Science; Public Health Nutrition; and Animal Nutrition. Conclusions: The revised competencies provide an updated framework of nutrition science knowledge for graduates to effectively practice in Australia. They may be used to benchmark current and future nutrition science degrees and lead to improved employability skills of nutrition science graduates.

KW - competency

KW - workforce development

KW - delphi

KW - nutrition science

U2 - 10.6133/apjcn.201903_28(1).0022

DO - 10.6133/apjcn.201903_28(1).0022

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 166

EP - 176

JO - Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition

T2 - Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition

JF - Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition

SN - 0964-7058

IS - 1

ER -