Development of representative indicators of hydrologic alteration

R.M. Vogel, C.N. Kroll, LeRoy POFF, J.D. Olden, Yongxuan Gao

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    137 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In an ideal world, a few overall indicators of hydrologic alteration would adequately describe the degree of hydrologic alteration caused by various forms of river regulation. Currently over 170 hydrologic indicators have been developed to describe different components of flow regimes, including the widely used Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration (IHA) that characterize the impact of river regulation on flow regimes in environmental flow studies. Many of these IHA indicators are intercorrelated, resulting in considerable information redundancy, which could lead to ineffective environmental flow management decisions. The objective of this research is to develop a small set of independent and representative hydrologic indicators that can best characterize hydrologic alteration caused by reservoirs and other forms of river regulation. Two sets of pre- and post-dam streamflow records are used: (1) based on artificial simulations of a wide range of reservoir release rules and (2) streamflow records for 189 gaging stations throughout the United States. Principal component analysis was used to address the intercorrelation among the IHA parameters. Results revealed that the recently introduced metrics termed ecodeficit and ecosurplus can provide a good overall representation of the degree of alteration of a streamflow time series. Across both datasets, 32 individual IHA statistics and several potential generalized indices, three indices based on the ecodeficit and ecosurplus explained the most variability associated with the ensemble of 32 IHA statistics.
    Original languageUndefined
    Pages (from-to)136-147
    Number of pages12
    JournalJournal of Hydrology
    Volume374
    Issue number1-2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Cite this

    Vogel, R. M., Kroll, C. N., POFF, L., Olden, J. D., & Gao, Y. (2009). Development of representative indicators of hydrologic alteration. Journal of Hydrology, 374(1-2), 136-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.009
    Vogel, R.M. ; Kroll, C.N. ; POFF, LeRoy ; Olden, J.D. ; Gao, Yongxuan. / Development of representative indicators of hydrologic alteration. In: Journal of Hydrology. 2009 ; Vol. 374, No. 1-2. pp. 136-147.
    @article{c8046a4434934e55ad9379a4a3503f0f,
    title = "Development of representative indicators of hydrologic alteration",
    abstract = "In an ideal world, a few overall indicators of hydrologic alteration would adequately describe the degree of hydrologic alteration caused by various forms of river regulation. Currently over 170 hydrologic indicators have been developed to describe different components of flow regimes, including the widely used Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration (IHA) that characterize the impact of river regulation on flow regimes in environmental flow studies. Many of these IHA indicators are intercorrelated, resulting in considerable information redundancy, which could lead to ineffective environmental flow management decisions. The objective of this research is to develop a small set of independent and representative hydrologic indicators that can best characterize hydrologic alteration caused by reservoirs and other forms of river regulation. Two sets of pre- and post-dam streamflow records are used: (1) based on artificial simulations of a wide range of reservoir release rules and (2) streamflow records for 189 gaging stations throughout the United States. Principal component analysis was used to address the intercorrelation among the IHA parameters. Results revealed that the recently introduced metrics termed ecodeficit and ecosurplus can provide a good overall representation of the degree of alteration of a streamflow time series. Across both datasets, 32 individual IHA statistics and several potential generalized indices, three indices based on the ecodeficit and ecosurplus explained the most variability associated with the ensemble of 32 IHA statistics.",
    author = "R.M. Vogel and C.N. Kroll and LeRoy POFF and J.D. Olden and Yongxuan Gao",
    note = "cited By 88",
    year = "2009",
    doi = "10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.009",
    language = "Undefined",
    volume = "374",
    pages = "136--147",
    journal = "Journal of Hydrology",
    issn = "0022-1694",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "1-2",

    }

    Vogel, RM, Kroll, CN, POFF, L, Olden, JD & Gao, Y 2009, 'Development of representative indicators of hydrologic alteration', Journal of Hydrology, vol. 374, no. 1-2, pp. 136-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.009

    Development of representative indicators of hydrologic alteration. / Vogel, R.M.; Kroll, C.N.; POFF, LeRoy; Olden, J.D.; Gao, Yongxuan.

    In: Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 374, No. 1-2, 2009, p. 136-147.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Development of representative indicators of hydrologic alteration

    AU - Vogel, R.M.

    AU - Kroll, C.N.

    AU - POFF, LeRoy

    AU - Olden, J.D.

    AU - Gao, Yongxuan

    N1 - cited By 88

    PY - 2009

    Y1 - 2009

    N2 - In an ideal world, a few overall indicators of hydrologic alteration would adequately describe the degree of hydrologic alteration caused by various forms of river regulation. Currently over 170 hydrologic indicators have been developed to describe different components of flow regimes, including the widely used Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration (IHA) that characterize the impact of river regulation on flow regimes in environmental flow studies. Many of these IHA indicators are intercorrelated, resulting in considerable information redundancy, which could lead to ineffective environmental flow management decisions. The objective of this research is to develop a small set of independent and representative hydrologic indicators that can best characterize hydrologic alteration caused by reservoirs and other forms of river regulation. Two sets of pre- and post-dam streamflow records are used: (1) based on artificial simulations of a wide range of reservoir release rules and (2) streamflow records for 189 gaging stations throughout the United States. Principal component analysis was used to address the intercorrelation among the IHA parameters. Results revealed that the recently introduced metrics termed ecodeficit and ecosurplus can provide a good overall representation of the degree of alteration of a streamflow time series. Across both datasets, 32 individual IHA statistics and several potential generalized indices, three indices based on the ecodeficit and ecosurplus explained the most variability associated with the ensemble of 32 IHA statistics.

    AB - In an ideal world, a few overall indicators of hydrologic alteration would adequately describe the degree of hydrologic alteration caused by various forms of river regulation. Currently over 170 hydrologic indicators have been developed to describe different components of flow regimes, including the widely used Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration (IHA) that characterize the impact of river regulation on flow regimes in environmental flow studies. Many of these IHA indicators are intercorrelated, resulting in considerable information redundancy, which could lead to ineffective environmental flow management decisions. The objective of this research is to develop a small set of independent and representative hydrologic indicators that can best characterize hydrologic alteration caused by reservoirs and other forms of river regulation. Two sets of pre- and post-dam streamflow records are used: (1) based on artificial simulations of a wide range of reservoir release rules and (2) streamflow records for 189 gaging stations throughout the United States. Principal component analysis was used to address the intercorrelation among the IHA parameters. Results revealed that the recently introduced metrics termed ecodeficit and ecosurplus can provide a good overall representation of the degree of alteration of a streamflow time series. Across both datasets, 32 individual IHA statistics and several potential generalized indices, three indices based on the ecodeficit and ecosurplus explained the most variability associated with the ensemble of 32 IHA statistics.

    U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.009

    DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.009

    M3 - Article

    VL - 374

    SP - 136

    EP - 147

    JO - Journal of Hydrology

    JF - Journal of Hydrology

    SN - 0022-1694

    IS - 1-2

    ER -