TY - JOUR
T1 - Diets of White-bellied Sea-Eagles Haliaeetus leucogaster and Whistling Kites Haliastur sphenurus breeding near Canberra, 2003-2008
AU - Olsen, Gerald
AU - Debus, Stephen
AU - Rose, A
AU - JUDGE, David
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - During 2003–2008, in and near the Australian Capital Territory, the diet of breeding White-bellied Sea-Eagles Haliaeetus leucogaster consisted of 8 per cent mammals (1% macropod, 1% hare), 42 per cent birds (33% waterbirds), 9 per cent turtles and 40 per cent fish by number (n = 78 items from four nests). Breeding Whistling Kites Haliastur sphenurus took 45 per cent mammals (26% rabbit), 43 per cent birds (13% waterbirds), 4 per cent lizards and 7 per cent fish (n = 136 items from three nests). By biomass, Sea-Eagles took 52 per cent fish; Whistling Kites took 64 per cent mammals, mostly rabbits, with little dietary overlap (Pianka Index 0.12). Despite the almost fivefold difference in these raptor species’ respective body mass, the Geometric Mean Prey Weight found for Sea-Eagles was 995 grams, and for Whistling Kites 606 grams (the latter skewed by the high incidence of mammal carrion). Dietary diversity (species richness and evenness: Shannon Index) was higher (3.24) for the Whistling Kite than for the White-bellied Sea-Eagle (2.68).
Eight water bodies in or near the ACT, rated for human disturbance (relative levels of boating, water-skiing, public vehicle access, walking and stock grazing), were surveyed for breeding Sea-Eagles and Whistling Kites during 2002–2010. Low Disturbance areas contained no breeding Whistling Kites or Sea-Eagles, although solitary Sea-Eagles were often present. Medium Disturbance areas contained breeding Sea-Eagles and Whistling Kites; High Disturbance areas contained breeding Whistling Kites, but no breeding Sea-Eagles. Low prey availability, and possible interspecific conflict with Wedge-tailed Eagles Aquila audax, may limit Sea-Eagle breeding in Low Disturbance areas.
AB - During 2003–2008, in and near the Australian Capital Territory, the diet of breeding White-bellied Sea-Eagles Haliaeetus leucogaster consisted of 8 per cent mammals (1% macropod, 1% hare), 42 per cent birds (33% waterbirds), 9 per cent turtles and 40 per cent fish by number (n = 78 items from four nests). Breeding Whistling Kites Haliastur sphenurus took 45 per cent mammals (26% rabbit), 43 per cent birds (13% waterbirds), 4 per cent lizards and 7 per cent fish (n = 136 items from three nests). By biomass, Sea-Eagles took 52 per cent fish; Whistling Kites took 64 per cent mammals, mostly rabbits, with little dietary overlap (Pianka Index 0.12). Despite the almost fivefold difference in these raptor species’ respective body mass, the Geometric Mean Prey Weight found for Sea-Eagles was 995 grams, and for Whistling Kites 606 grams (the latter skewed by the high incidence of mammal carrion). Dietary diversity (species richness and evenness: Shannon Index) was higher (3.24) for the Whistling Kite than for the White-bellied Sea-Eagle (2.68).
Eight water bodies in or near the ACT, rated for human disturbance (relative levels of boating, water-skiing, public vehicle access, walking and stock grazing), were surveyed for breeding Sea-Eagles and Whistling Kites during 2002–2010. Low Disturbance areas contained no breeding Whistling Kites or Sea-Eagles, although solitary Sea-Eagles were often present. Medium Disturbance areas contained breeding Sea-Eagles and Whistling Kites; High Disturbance areas contained breeding Whistling Kites, but no breeding Sea-Eagles. Low prey availability, and possible interspecific conflict with Wedge-tailed Eagles Aquila audax, may limit Sea-Eagle breeding in Low Disturbance areas.
M3 - Article
SN - 0155-0438
VL - 37
SP - 13
EP - 18
JO - Corella
JF - Corella
IS - 1
ER -