Differences between Saudi Arabian and Australian radiographers knowledge and attitudes about paediatric CT doses

H Al Mohiy, Jenny Sim, Euclid SEERAM, Rob DAVIDSON

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Computed tomography (CT) is used extensively in diagnostic radiology for examination of human soft tissues and is widely used in the paediatric population. Researchers and government regulators have expressed concerns about the cancer risk of CT radiation on children. The authors surveyed Saudi Arabian and Australian radiographers to enable comparison of their attitudes and knowledge towards paediatric CT radiation dose. Methods: Radiographers from all exclusively paediatric public hospitals in Australia and Saudi Arabia were sent a structured, purpose‐designed questionnaire. Data were analysed using univariate statistics. Results: 56 of 71 eligible Saudi Arabian radiographers (79%) and 50 of 83 Australian radiographers (60%) participated. Australian participants were more highly educated and had longer work experience than their Saudi counterparts, and undertook most forms of ongoing training and education significantly more frequently. Australians' mean ratings of radiation risk for head and chest CT scans were similar to those given by Saudi respondents, but Australians' mean ratings for abdomen/pelvis CT scans were significantly lower. More Australians reported intervening to reduce paediatric dose (95.7% vs 72.7%, P < 0.005), and 88.0% believed that over 60% of CT scans are justified compared with 8.9% of Saudi participants. Conclusion: Australian and Saudi Arabian radiographers working in paediatric hospitals differ in their knowledge bases. Knowledge can be improved through enhancement of hospital protocols and continuing education and training, and will lead to reduced radiation exposure among paediatric patients.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-27
Number of pages7
JournalThe Radiographer
Volume58
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tomography
Pediatrics
Pediatric Hospitals
Radiation
Knowledge Bases
Saudi Arabia
Public Hospitals
Continuing Education
Pelvis
Radiology
Abdomen
Thorax
Head
Research Personnel
Education
Population
Neoplasms
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

@article{77712fc5d071479599e30947020d6304,
title = "Differences between Saudi Arabian and Australian radiographers knowledge and attitudes about paediatric CT doses",
abstract = "Purpose: Computed tomography (CT) is used extensively in diagnostic radiology for examination of human soft tissues and is widely used in the paediatric population. Researchers and government regulators have expressed concerns about the cancer risk of CT radiation on children. The authors surveyed Saudi Arabian and Australian radiographers to enable comparison of their attitudes and knowledge towards paediatric CT radiation dose. Methods: Radiographers from all exclusively paediatric public hospitals in Australia and Saudi Arabia were sent a structured, purpose‐designed questionnaire. Data were analysed using univariate statistics. Results: 56 of 71 eligible Saudi Arabian radiographers (79{\%}) and 50 of 83 Australian radiographers (60{\%}) participated. Australian participants were more highly educated and had longer work experience than their Saudi counterparts, and undertook most forms of ongoing training and education significantly more frequently. Australians' mean ratings of radiation risk for head and chest CT scans were similar to those given by Saudi respondents, but Australians' mean ratings for abdomen/pelvis CT scans were significantly lower. More Australians reported intervening to reduce paediatric dose (95.7{\%} vs 72.7{\%}, P < 0.005), and 88.0{\%} believed that over 60{\%} of CT scans are justified compared with 8.9{\%} of Saudi participants. Conclusion: Australian and Saudi Arabian radiographers working in paediatric hospitals differ in their knowledge bases. Knowledge can be improved through enhancement of hospital protocols and continuing education and training, and will lead to reduced radiation exposure among paediatric patients.",
author = "Mohiy, {H Al} and Jenny Sim and Euclid SEERAM and Rob DAVIDSON",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1002/j.2051-3909.2011.tb00151.x",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "21--27",
journal = "The Radiographer",
issn = "1170-9758",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "3",

}

Differences between Saudi Arabian and Australian radiographers knowledge and attitudes about paediatric CT doses. / Mohiy, H Al; Sim, Jenny; SEERAM, Euclid; DAVIDSON, Rob.

In: The Radiographer, Vol. 58, No. 3, 2011, p. 21-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences between Saudi Arabian and Australian radiographers knowledge and attitudes about paediatric CT doses

AU - Mohiy, H Al

AU - Sim, Jenny

AU - SEERAM, Euclid

AU - DAVIDSON, Rob

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Purpose: Computed tomography (CT) is used extensively in diagnostic radiology for examination of human soft tissues and is widely used in the paediatric population. Researchers and government regulators have expressed concerns about the cancer risk of CT radiation on children. The authors surveyed Saudi Arabian and Australian radiographers to enable comparison of their attitudes and knowledge towards paediatric CT radiation dose. Methods: Radiographers from all exclusively paediatric public hospitals in Australia and Saudi Arabia were sent a structured, purpose‐designed questionnaire. Data were analysed using univariate statistics. Results: 56 of 71 eligible Saudi Arabian radiographers (79%) and 50 of 83 Australian radiographers (60%) participated. Australian participants were more highly educated and had longer work experience than their Saudi counterparts, and undertook most forms of ongoing training and education significantly more frequently. Australians' mean ratings of radiation risk for head and chest CT scans were similar to those given by Saudi respondents, but Australians' mean ratings for abdomen/pelvis CT scans were significantly lower. More Australians reported intervening to reduce paediatric dose (95.7% vs 72.7%, P < 0.005), and 88.0% believed that over 60% of CT scans are justified compared with 8.9% of Saudi participants. Conclusion: Australian and Saudi Arabian radiographers working in paediatric hospitals differ in their knowledge bases. Knowledge can be improved through enhancement of hospital protocols and continuing education and training, and will lead to reduced radiation exposure among paediatric patients.

AB - Purpose: Computed tomography (CT) is used extensively in diagnostic radiology for examination of human soft tissues and is widely used in the paediatric population. Researchers and government regulators have expressed concerns about the cancer risk of CT radiation on children. The authors surveyed Saudi Arabian and Australian radiographers to enable comparison of their attitudes and knowledge towards paediatric CT radiation dose. Methods: Radiographers from all exclusively paediatric public hospitals in Australia and Saudi Arabia were sent a structured, purpose‐designed questionnaire. Data were analysed using univariate statistics. Results: 56 of 71 eligible Saudi Arabian radiographers (79%) and 50 of 83 Australian radiographers (60%) participated. Australian participants were more highly educated and had longer work experience than their Saudi counterparts, and undertook most forms of ongoing training and education significantly more frequently. Australians' mean ratings of radiation risk for head and chest CT scans were similar to those given by Saudi respondents, but Australians' mean ratings for abdomen/pelvis CT scans were significantly lower. More Australians reported intervening to reduce paediatric dose (95.7% vs 72.7%, P < 0.005), and 88.0% believed that over 60% of CT scans are justified compared with 8.9% of Saudi participants. Conclusion: Australian and Saudi Arabian radiographers working in paediatric hospitals differ in their knowledge bases. Knowledge can be improved through enhancement of hospital protocols and continuing education and training, and will lead to reduced radiation exposure among paediatric patients.

U2 - 10.1002/j.2051-3909.2011.tb00151.x

DO - 10.1002/j.2051-3909.2011.tb00151.x

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 21

EP - 27

JO - The Radiographer

JF - The Radiographer

SN - 1170-9758

IS - 3

ER -