Different knowledge, different styles of reasoning: A challenge for guideline development

Sietse Wieringa; Dunja Dreesens; Frode Forland; Carel Hulshof; Sue Lukersmith; Fergus Macbeth; Beth Shaw; Arlène Van Vliet; Teun Zuiderent-Jerak

doi:10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110844

Different knowledge, different styles of reasoning: A challenge for guideline development

Sietse Wieringa
, Dunja Dreesens
, Frode Forland
, Carel Hulshof
, Sue Lukersmith
, Fergus Macbeth
, Beth Shaw
, Arlène Van Vliet
, Teun Zuiderent-Jerak

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evidence-based guidelines whether national, regional or developed by specialty groups, must search for, and explicitly consider, evidence from sources other than conventional clinical trials and their quantitative data. This need for appraising and including knowledge from a wide variety of sources in guideline development is well recognised.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	87-91
Number of pages	5
Journal	BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
Volume	23
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110844
Publication status	Published - 1 Jun 2018
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110844

Cite this

@article{f40dd44394a746a399b101dec2616a00,

title = "Different knowledge, different styles of reasoning: A challenge for guideline development",

abstract = "Evidence-based guidelines whether national, regional or developed by specialty groups, must search for, and explicitly consider, evidence from sources other than conventional clinical trials and their quantitative data. This need for appraising and including knowledge from a wide variety of sources in guideline development is well recognised.",

author = "Sietse Wieringa and Dunja Dreesens and Frode Forland and Carel Hulshof and Sue Lukersmith and Fergus Macbeth and Beth Shaw and \{Van Vliet\}, Arl{\`e}ne and Teun Zuiderent-Jerak",

year = "2018",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110844",

language = "English",

volume = "23",

pages = "87--91",

journal = "BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine",

issn = "2515-446X",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Different knowledge, different styles of reasoning

T2 - A challenge for guideline development

AU - Wieringa, Sietse

AU - Dreesens, Dunja

AU - Forland, Frode

AU - Hulshof, Carel

AU - Lukersmith, Sue

AU - Macbeth, Fergus

AU - Shaw, Beth

AU - Van Vliet, Arlène

AU - Zuiderent-Jerak, Teun

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Evidence-based guidelines whether national, regional or developed by specialty groups, must search for, and explicitly consider, evidence from sources other than conventional clinical trials and their quantitative data. This need for appraising and including knowledge from a wide variety of sources in guideline development is well recognised.

AB - Evidence-based guidelines whether national, regional or developed by specialty groups, must search for, and explicitly consider, evidence from sources other than conventional clinical trials and their quantitative data. This need for appraising and including knowledge from a wide variety of sources in guideline development is well recognised.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85052650696

U2 - 10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110844

DO - 10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110844

M3 - Article

C2 - 29615396

AN - SCOPUS:85052650696

SN - 2515-446X

VL - 23

SP - 87

EP - 91

JO - BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine

JF - BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine

IS - 3

ER -

Different knowledge, different styles of reasoning: A challenge for guideline development

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this