Activities per year
Abstract
In November 2021 we published an article in The Conversation which obviously touched a nerve since it was shared by around 7,000 readers. The article, 'Students are told not to use Wikipedia for research. But it’s a trustworthy source’, derived from our observation that first-year university students are being held back by an outdated view of Wikipedia, which they were taught in school. Given the usefulness of Wikipedia as both a source of information and as a media literacy teaching tool, this article was intended to change the narrative around Wikipedia. It represented the first step in a pilot project investigating the use of Wikipedia as a fact-checking resource in schools.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-4 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Connections |
Issue number | 121 |
Publication status | Published - 3 May 2022 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Digital literacy: Using Wikipedia as a fact-checking tool: Is it time to start thinking about whether Wikipedia can be a useful research tool? Mathieu O'Neil and Rachel Cunneen investigate.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Activities
- 1 Oral presentation
-
News, Trust & Misinformation: Evidence and Strategies webinar
Kerry Maria Mccallum (Speaker), Caroline Fisher (Speaker), Sora Park (Speaker), Kieran Mcguinness (Speaker) & Mathieu O'Neil (Speaker)
27 Oct 2022Activity: Talk or presentation › Oral presentation