Digital media and models of biocommunicability in health journalism

insights from the production and reception of mental health news

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article explores some of the ways in which digital and social media are potentially impacting health journalism, with particular attention to a series of interviews with Australian journalists about their experiences when reporting on mental health issues. The article draws on the concept of biocommunicability developed by Briggs and Hallin as a lens through which to examine the ways in which journalists position themselves and other social actors in the construction of health news. In particular, the article engages the question of how digital media may work to enable and constrain biomedical authority, patient-consumer and public sphere orientations to health journalism. The article considers the interview findings in relation to previous research from journalism studies and focuses on issues around sourcing practices, content demands and web traffic/analytics as a measure of audience interest. Some areas for further research are identified.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67
Number of pages77
JournalAustralian Journalism Review
Volume39
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

digital media
journalism
news
mental health
journalist
health
social actor
interview
social media
traffic
experience

Cite this

@article{bb2d5e78e43443c0bff5870ba0d4d3db,
title = "Digital media and models of biocommunicability in health journalism: insights from the production and reception of mental health news",
abstract = "This article explores some of the ways in which digital and social media are potentially impacting health journalism, with particular attention to a series of interviews with Australian journalists about their experiences when reporting on mental health issues. The article draws on the concept of biocommunicability developed by Briggs and Hallin as a lens through which to examine the ways in which journalists position themselves and other social actors in the construction of health news. In particular, the article engages the question of how digital media may work to enable and constrain biomedical authority, patient-consumer and public sphere orientations to health journalism. The article considers the interview findings in relation to previous research from journalism studies and focuses on issues around sourcing practices, content demands and web traffic/analytics as a measure of audience interest. Some areas for further research are identified.",
keywords = "mental health, media, journalism, biocommunicability",
author = "Kate HOLLAND",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "67",
journal = "Australian Journalism Review",
issn = "0810-2686",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Digital media and models of biocommunicability in health journalism

T2 - insights from the production and reception of mental health news

AU - HOLLAND, Kate

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - This article explores some of the ways in which digital and social media are potentially impacting health journalism, with particular attention to a series of interviews with Australian journalists about their experiences when reporting on mental health issues. The article draws on the concept of biocommunicability developed by Briggs and Hallin as a lens through which to examine the ways in which journalists position themselves and other social actors in the construction of health news. In particular, the article engages the question of how digital media may work to enable and constrain biomedical authority, patient-consumer and public sphere orientations to health journalism. The article considers the interview findings in relation to previous research from journalism studies and focuses on issues around sourcing practices, content demands and web traffic/analytics as a measure of audience interest. Some areas for further research are identified.

AB - This article explores some of the ways in which digital and social media are potentially impacting health journalism, with particular attention to a series of interviews with Australian journalists about their experiences when reporting on mental health issues. The article draws on the concept of biocommunicability developed by Briggs and Hallin as a lens through which to examine the ways in which journalists position themselves and other social actors in the construction of health news. In particular, the article engages the question of how digital media may work to enable and constrain biomedical authority, patient-consumer and public sphere orientations to health journalism. The article considers the interview findings in relation to previous research from journalism studies and focuses on issues around sourcing practices, content demands and web traffic/analytics as a measure of audience interest. Some areas for further research are identified.

KW - mental health

KW - media

KW - journalism

KW - biocommunicability

UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DE140100100

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 67

JO - Australian Journalism Review

JF - Australian Journalism Review

SN - 0810-2686

IS - 2

ER -