Abstract
This article explores some of the ways in which digital and social media are potentially impacting health journalism, with particular attention to a series of interviews with Australian journalists about their experiences when reporting on mental health issues. The article draws on the concept of biocommunicability developed by Briggs and Hallin as a lens through which to examine the ways in which journalists position themselves and other social actors in the construction of health news. In particular, the article engages the question of how digital media may work to enable and constrain biomedical authority, patient-consumer and public sphere orientations to health journalism. The article considers the interview findings in relation to previous research from journalism studies and focuses on issues around sourcing practices, content demands and web traffic/analytics as a measure of audience interest. Some areas for further research are identified.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 67-78 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Australian Journalism Review |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Digital media and models of biocommunicability in health journalism: insights from the production and reception of mental health news'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver