Digital radio and market failure: a tale of two complimentary platforms

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose– In sharp contrast to television, various sources of market failure currently prevent market forces fulfilling the promise of digital switchover in radio markets. The purpose of this paper is to review the strengths and weaknesses, business models and market deployment of the two main platforms, with a view to establishing the economic case for higher regulatory involvement in digital radio markets. Design/methodology/approach– The paper analyses the relevant broadcaster, engineering and regulatory literature, with particular emphasis on technical compatibilities among terrestrial radio broadcast technologies, and the technological and economic difficulties they face. The exercise is the first of its kind to scope and bring together these multidisciplinary contributions. Findings– The highly uncoordinated development and deployment of terrestrial digital radio platforms is leading this new digital industry to an impasse. There is a legacy of uncertainty and scepticism amongst market players. Furthermore, prevailing technology and business models have marginalised community radio services and regional audiences. Research limitations/implications– The analysis does not cover the demand side (contents, culture) nor developments in non‐terrestrial digital platforms, nor in the US‐based IBOC standard. Practical implications– There is considerable scope, particularly in large, sparsely inhabited countries with sizeable rural audiences to remedy the failings of the current fragmented approach through regulatory intervention through platform integration. Originality/value– There is a lack of coherent information published on the potential benefits that the new digital platforms are bringing to the audio broadcasting market, and on the current market difficulties they face. The article remedies this gap.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-20
Number of pages18
JournalInfo (Bingley)
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Digital radio
market failure
radio
market
Industry
Economics
Broadcasting
Television
remedies
broadcaster
broadcasting
Market failure
television
broadcast
economics
uncertainty
engineering
industry
lack
demand

Cite this

@article{8c6cd92e46264c8aa5c49c220c9fabc4,
title = "Digital radio and market failure: a tale of two complimentary platforms",
abstract = "Purpose– In sharp contrast to television, various sources of market failure currently prevent market forces fulfilling the promise of digital switchover in radio markets. The purpose of this paper is to review the strengths and weaknesses, business models and market deployment of the two main platforms, with a view to establishing the economic case for higher regulatory involvement in digital radio markets. Design/methodology/approach– The paper analyses the relevant broadcaster, engineering and regulatory literature, with particular emphasis on technical compatibilities among terrestrial radio broadcast technologies, and the technological and economic difficulties they face. The exercise is the first of its kind to scope and bring together these multidisciplinary contributions. Findings– The highly uncoordinated development and deployment of terrestrial digital radio platforms is leading this new digital industry to an impasse. There is a legacy of uncertainty and scepticism amongst market players. Furthermore, prevailing technology and business models have marginalised community radio services and regional audiences. Research limitations/implications– The analysis does not cover the demand side (contents, culture) nor developments in non‐terrestrial digital platforms, nor in the US‐based IBOC standard. Practical implications– There is considerable scope, particularly in large, sparsely inhabited countries with sizeable rural audiences to remedy the failings of the current fragmented approach through regulatory intervention through platform integration. Originality/value– There is a lack of coherent information published on the potential benefits that the new digital platforms are bringing to the audio broadcasting market, and on the current market difficulties they face. The article remedies this gap.",
keywords = "Digital Radio, Technical Standards, Radio Broadcasting",
author = "Benoit Freyens",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1108/14636691211256278",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "3--20",
journal = "Info",
issn = "1463-6697",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

Digital radio and market failure: a tale of two complimentary platforms. / Freyens, Benoit.

In: Info (Bingley), Vol. 14, No. 5, 2012, p. 3-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Digital radio and market failure: a tale of two complimentary platforms

AU - Freyens, Benoit

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Purpose– In sharp contrast to television, various sources of market failure currently prevent market forces fulfilling the promise of digital switchover in radio markets. The purpose of this paper is to review the strengths and weaknesses, business models and market deployment of the two main platforms, with a view to establishing the economic case for higher regulatory involvement in digital radio markets. Design/methodology/approach– The paper analyses the relevant broadcaster, engineering and regulatory literature, with particular emphasis on technical compatibilities among terrestrial radio broadcast technologies, and the technological and economic difficulties they face. The exercise is the first of its kind to scope and bring together these multidisciplinary contributions. Findings– The highly uncoordinated development and deployment of terrestrial digital radio platforms is leading this new digital industry to an impasse. There is a legacy of uncertainty and scepticism amongst market players. Furthermore, prevailing technology and business models have marginalised community radio services and regional audiences. Research limitations/implications– The analysis does not cover the demand side (contents, culture) nor developments in non‐terrestrial digital platforms, nor in the US‐based IBOC standard. Practical implications– There is considerable scope, particularly in large, sparsely inhabited countries with sizeable rural audiences to remedy the failings of the current fragmented approach through regulatory intervention through platform integration. Originality/value– There is a lack of coherent information published on the potential benefits that the new digital platforms are bringing to the audio broadcasting market, and on the current market difficulties they face. The article remedies this gap.

AB - Purpose– In sharp contrast to television, various sources of market failure currently prevent market forces fulfilling the promise of digital switchover in radio markets. The purpose of this paper is to review the strengths and weaknesses, business models and market deployment of the two main platforms, with a view to establishing the economic case for higher regulatory involvement in digital radio markets. Design/methodology/approach– The paper analyses the relevant broadcaster, engineering and regulatory literature, with particular emphasis on technical compatibilities among terrestrial radio broadcast technologies, and the technological and economic difficulties they face. The exercise is the first of its kind to scope and bring together these multidisciplinary contributions. Findings– The highly uncoordinated development and deployment of terrestrial digital radio platforms is leading this new digital industry to an impasse. There is a legacy of uncertainty and scepticism amongst market players. Furthermore, prevailing technology and business models have marginalised community radio services and regional audiences. Research limitations/implications– The analysis does not cover the demand side (contents, culture) nor developments in non‐terrestrial digital platforms, nor in the US‐based IBOC standard. Practical implications– There is considerable scope, particularly in large, sparsely inhabited countries with sizeable rural audiences to remedy the failings of the current fragmented approach through regulatory intervention through platform integration. Originality/value– There is a lack of coherent information published on the potential benefits that the new digital platforms are bringing to the audio broadcasting market, and on the current market difficulties they face. The article remedies this gap.

KW - Digital Radio

KW - Technical Standards

KW - Radio Broadcasting

U2 - 10.1108/14636691211256278

DO - 10.1108/14636691211256278

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 3

EP - 20

JO - Info

JF - Info

SN - 1463-6697

IS - 5

ER -