Abstract
The paper proposes that a reason why long-term disaster initiatives fail is the adoption of a linear, complicated problem based approach rather than seeing recovery as a complex system. The argument is that initial post-disaster responses are complicated with a subsequent transition to a complex problem. Transition is proffered as a missing link between short-term responses (rescue and relief) and long-term disaster recovery. Case data from Japan and Christchurch suggests that three system elements influencing potential transition are: the actors and their purpose; new forms of social capital and a move to greater co-production with community. Influencing these effectively will support greater traction to achieve the move to long-term recovery.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 124-129 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Academy of Management Proceedings |
| Volume | 2016 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
| Event | 76th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2016 - Anaheim, United States Duration: 5 Aug 2016 → 9 Aug 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Disaster resilience as a complex problem: Giving disaster resilience new meaning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver