Disasters Can Lift Veils: Five Issues for Sociological Disaster Studies

Nicole CURATO, Jonathan Corpus Ong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this Introduction to the Special Issue, we aim to take stock of these theoretical, methodological, and political debates by summarizing five key issues in the sociology of disasters. We have selected these issues based on recurring themes we have observed as we surveyed the literature, conducted our own field research, and exchanged ideas with fellow participants in the PSS conference. In the next section we ask five key questions: (1) Do disasters mark change or continuity?; (2) Are disasters exceptional events defined by solidarity or anomie?; (3) Do sociological disaster studies need to decenter human societies from the focus of inquiry?; (4) What perspective can global sociology offer in disaster studies?; and (5) Have sociologists become part of the so-called “disaster industrial complex” of parachute journalists, humanitarian workers, disaster risk reduction experts, and reconstruction project consultants? Our modest attempt to take on these questions and bring together these debates is by no means exhaustive and by any stretch of the imagination definitive. Our goal is to set the scene for the articles published in this issue by locating their sociological engagements in the growing field of sociological disaster research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-26
Number of pages26
JournalPhilippine Sociological Review
Volume63
Issue numberSpecial Issue
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

disaster
sociology
anomie
field research
journalist
sociologist
solidarity
continuity
reconstruction
expert
worker
event
society

Cite this

CURATO, Nicole ; Ong, Jonathan Corpus. / Disasters Can Lift Veils: Five Issues for Sociological Disaster Studies. In: Philippine Sociological Review. 2015 ; Vol. 63, No. Special Issue. pp. 1-26.
@article{23d1e974dd134f7598a4ef5778a02fc9,
title = "Disasters Can Lift Veils: Five Issues for Sociological Disaster Studies",
abstract = "In this Introduction to the Special Issue, we aim to take stock of these theoretical, methodological, and political debates by summarizing five key issues in the sociology of disasters. We have selected these issues based on recurring themes we have observed as we surveyed the literature, conducted our own field research, and exchanged ideas with fellow participants in the PSS conference. In the next section we ask five key questions: (1) Do disasters mark change or continuity?; (2) Are disasters exceptional events defined by solidarity or anomie?; (3) Do sociological disaster studies need to decenter human societies from the focus of inquiry?; (4) What perspective can global sociology offer in disaster studies?; and (5) Have sociologists become part of the so-called “disaster industrial complex” of parachute journalists, humanitarian workers, disaster risk reduction experts, and reconstruction project consultants? Our modest attempt to take on these questions and bring together these debates is by no means exhaustive and by any stretch of the imagination definitive. Our goal is to set the scene for the articles published in this issue by locating their sociological engagements in the growing field of sociological disaster research.",
author = "Nicole CURATO and Ong, {Jonathan Corpus}",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "1--26",
journal = "Philippine Sociological Review",
issn = "0031-7810",
number = "Special Issue",

}

Disasters Can Lift Veils: Five Issues for Sociological Disaster Studies. / CURATO, Nicole; Ong, Jonathan Corpus.

In: Philippine Sociological Review, Vol. 63, No. Special Issue, 2015, p. 1-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disasters Can Lift Veils: Five Issues for Sociological Disaster Studies

AU - CURATO, Nicole

AU - Ong, Jonathan Corpus

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - In this Introduction to the Special Issue, we aim to take stock of these theoretical, methodological, and political debates by summarizing five key issues in the sociology of disasters. We have selected these issues based on recurring themes we have observed as we surveyed the literature, conducted our own field research, and exchanged ideas with fellow participants in the PSS conference. In the next section we ask five key questions: (1) Do disasters mark change or continuity?; (2) Are disasters exceptional events defined by solidarity or anomie?; (3) Do sociological disaster studies need to decenter human societies from the focus of inquiry?; (4) What perspective can global sociology offer in disaster studies?; and (5) Have sociologists become part of the so-called “disaster industrial complex” of parachute journalists, humanitarian workers, disaster risk reduction experts, and reconstruction project consultants? Our modest attempt to take on these questions and bring together these debates is by no means exhaustive and by any stretch of the imagination definitive. Our goal is to set the scene for the articles published in this issue by locating their sociological engagements in the growing field of sociological disaster research.

AB - In this Introduction to the Special Issue, we aim to take stock of these theoretical, methodological, and political debates by summarizing five key issues in the sociology of disasters. We have selected these issues based on recurring themes we have observed as we surveyed the literature, conducted our own field research, and exchanged ideas with fellow participants in the PSS conference. In the next section we ask five key questions: (1) Do disasters mark change or continuity?; (2) Are disasters exceptional events defined by solidarity or anomie?; (3) Do sociological disaster studies need to decenter human societies from the focus of inquiry?; (4) What perspective can global sociology offer in disaster studies?; and (5) Have sociologists become part of the so-called “disaster industrial complex” of parachute journalists, humanitarian workers, disaster risk reduction experts, and reconstruction project consultants? Our modest attempt to take on these questions and bring together these debates is by no means exhaustive and by any stretch of the imagination definitive. Our goal is to set the scene for the articles published in this issue by locating their sociological engagements in the growing field of sociological disaster research.

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 1

EP - 26

JO - Philippine Sociological Review

JF - Philippine Sociological Review

SN - 0031-7810

IS - Special Issue

ER -