Discounting the mother-child relationship in parenting orders: A snapshot in time

Patricia EASTEAL, Alicia Prest, Fanny THORNTON

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We look at mothers who have lost parental responsibility and who have been ordered to spend no or at best minimal supervised time with their child(ren). Our case sample included 50 recent interim and final first instance judgments heard in the Federal Circuit Court or the Family Court, as well as 13 judgments from the Family Court of Australia Full Court. We discover that the nature and quality of the pre-existing attachment of mother and child are outweighed by a view that the child(ren) would be at an unacceptable risk of harm in the mother’s care attributable to some sort of maternal dysfunction or an inability to acknowledge (and/or treat) its impact on her parenting capacity. The most common maternal harm identified by judicial officers was emotional and included the mother’s inability to facilitate a meaningful relationship between the father and his child(ren); in some matters this derived from the mother’s concerns about physical or sexual harm perpetrated by the father. In addition, decision-making themes found in our analysis included siblings, children’s views and the important role of the independent children’s lawyer and family consultant. We conclude by highlighting areas of concern and make recommendations to prevent inconsistencies and undue influence in proceedings.
LanguageEnglish
Pages221-248
Number of pages28
JournalAustralian Journal of Family Law
Volume32
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Parenting
Ren
Harm
Proceedings
Inconsistency
Sexual
Siblings
Emotion
Consultants
Responsibility
Physical
Lawyers
Decision Making

Cite this

@article{a47bc3b513f94a5f9e3aa2654fe65656,
title = "Discounting the mother-child relationship in parenting orders: A snapshot in time",
abstract = "We look at mothers who have lost parental responsibility and who have been ordered to spend no or at best minimal supervised time with their child(ren). Our case sample included 50 recent interim and final first instance judgments heard in the Federal Circuit Court or the Family Court, as well as 13 judgments from the Family Court of Australia Full Court. We discover that the nature and quality of the pre-existing attachment of mother and child are outweighed by a view that the child(ren) would be at an unacceptable risk of harm in the mother’s care attributable to some sort of maternal dysfunction or an inability to acknowledge (and/or treat) its impact on her parenting capacity. The most common maternal harm identified by judicial officers was emotional and included the mother’s inability to facilitate a meaningful relationship between the father and his child(ren); in some matters this derived from the mother’s concerns about physical or sexual harm perpetrated by the father. In addition, decision-making themes found in our analysis included siblings, children’s views and the important role of the independent children’s lawyer and family consultant. We conclude by highlighting areas of concern and make recommendations to prevent inconsistencies and undue influence in proceedings.",
keywords = "Family Law, Parenting Orders, Mothers, Mother-Child Relations",
author = "Patricia EASTEAL and Alicia Prest and Fanny THORNTON",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "221--248",
journal = "Australian Journal of Family Law",
issn = "0817-623X",
number = "3",

}

Discounting the mother-child relationship in parenting orders: A snapshot in time. / EASTEAL, Patricia; Prest, Alicia; THORNTON, Fanny.

In: Australian Journal of Family Law, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2019, p. 221-248.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discounting the mother-child relationship in parenting orders: A snapshot in time

AU - EASTEAL, Patricia

AU - Prest, Alicia

AU - THORNTON, Fanny

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - We look at mothers who have lost parental responsibility and who have been ordered to spend no or at best minimal supervised time with their child(ren). Our case sample included 50 recent interim and final first instance judgments heard in the Federal Circuit Court or the Family Court, as well as 13 judgments from the Family Court of Australia Full Court. We discover that the nature and quality of the pre-existing attachment of mother and child are outweighed by a view that the child(ren) would be at an unacceptable risk of harm in the mother’s care attributable to some sort of maternal dysfunction or an inability to acknowledge (and/or treat) its impact on her parenting capacity. The most common maternal harm identified by judicial officers was emotional and included the mother’s inability to facilitate a meaningful relationship between the father and his child(ren); in some matters this derived from the mother’s concerns about physical or sexual harm perpetrated by the father. In addition, decision-making themes found in our analysis included siblings, children’s views and the important role of the independent children’s lawyer and family consultant. We conclude by highlighting areas of concern and make recommendations to prevent inconsistencies and undue influence in proceedings.

AB - We look at mothers who have lost parental responsibility and who have been ordered to spend no or at best minimal supervised time with their child(ren). Our case sample included 50 recent interim and final first instance judgments heard in the Federal Circuit Court or the Family Court, as well as 13 judgments from the Family Court of Australia Full Court. We discover that the nature and quality of the pre-existing attachment of mother and child are outweighed by a view that the child(ren) would be at an unacceptable risk of harm in the mother’s care attributable to some sort of maternal dysfunction or an inability to acknowledge (and/or treat) its impact on her parenting capacity. The most common maternal harm identified by judicial officers was emotional and included the mother’s inability to facilitate a meaningful relationship between the father and his child(ren); in some matters this derived from the mother’s concerns about physical or sexual harm perpetrated by the father. In addition, decision-making themes found in our analysis included siblings, children’s views and the important role of the independent children’s lawyer and family consultant. We conclude by highlighting areas of concern and make recommendations to prevent inconsistencies and undue influence in proceedings.

KW - Family Law

KW - Parenting Orders

KW - Mothers

KW - Mother-Child Relations

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 221

EP - 248

JO - Australian Journal of Family Law

T2 - Australian Journal of Family Law

JF - Australian Journal of Family Law

SN - 0817-623X

IS - 3

ER -