Disruption or transformation?

Australian policymaking in the face of Indigenous contestation

Tanja Dreher, Lisa Waller, Kerry MCCALLUM

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

From the Zapatista’s “netwar” to the “hashtag activism” of Idle No More, Indigenous peoples have pioneered digital media for global connectivity and contestation. This chapter explores the promise and the pitfalls of social media for First Nations protest in Australia. Overall, we find new opportunities for disruption and ongoing challenges with regard to significant social and political transformation. The argument is illustrated with two exemplars. Firstly, the “Recognise” campaign is a state-sponsored public information and awareness campaign with a well-developed social media and branding strategy. Dissenting Indigenous voices have been highly successful in disrupting this campaign and asserting an alternative agenda including Treaty and Land Rights. Secondly, the #IASLottery campaign responded to the new Indigenous Advancement Strategy, with less success in impacting policy debates.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationGlobal Cultures of Contestation
Subtitle of host publicationMobility, Sustainability, Aesthetics & Connectivity 
EditorsEsther Peeren, Robin Celikates, Jeroen de Kloet, Thomas Poell
Place of PublicationCham, Switzerland
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Chapter11
Pages215-240
Number of pages26
ISBN (Electronic)9783319639826
ISBN (Print)9783319/639819
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Publication series

NamePalgrave Studies in Globalization, Culture and Society
PublisherPalgrave McMillan

Fingerprint

Disruption
Contestation
Policy Making
Social Media
Pitfalls
Agenda
Indigenous Peoples
Political Transformation
Branding
Connectivity
Digital Media
Protest
Treaties
Activism
Land Rights
First Nations
Social Transformation

Cite this

Dreher, T., Waller, L., & MCCALLUM, K. (2017). Disruption or transformation? Australian policymaking in the face of Indigenous contestation. In E. Peeren, R. Celikates, J. de Kloet, & T. Poell (Eds.), Global Cultures of Contestation: Mobility, Sustainability, Aesthetics & Connectivity  (pp. 215-240). (Palgrave Studies in Globalization, Culture and Society). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63982-6
Dreher, Tanja ; Waller, Lisa ; MCCALLUM, Kerry. / Disruption or transformation? Australian policymaking in the face of Indigenous contestation. Global Cultures of Contestation: Mobility, Sustainability, Aesthetics & Connectivity . editor / Esther Peeren ; Robin Celikates ; Jeroen de Kloet ; Thomas Poell. Cham, Switzerland : Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. pp. 215-240 (Palgrave Studies in Globalization, Culture and Society).
@inbook{ad335b37e46c4fdebcad4a01a6e9feda,
title = "Disruption or transformation?: Australian policymaking in the face of Indigenous contestation",
abstract = "From the Zapatista’s “netwar” to the “hashtag activism” of Idle No More, Indigenous peoples have pioneered digital media for global connectivity and contestation. This chapter explores the promise and the pitfalls of social media for First Nations protest in Australia. Overall, we find new opportunities for disruption and ongoing challenges with regard to significant social and political transformation. The argument is illustrated with two exemplars. Firstly, the “Recognise” campaign is a state-sponsored public information and awareness campaign with a well-developed social media and branding strategy. Dissenting Indigenous voices have been highly successful in disrupting this campaign and asserting an alternative agenda including Treaty and Land Rights. Secondly, the #IASLottery campaign responded to the new Indigenous Advancement Strategy, with less success in impacting policy debates.",
keywords = "Digital Disruption, Indigenous policy, Indigenous social media, Indigenous recognition",
author = "Tanja Dreher and Lisa Waller and Kerry MCCALLUM",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-63982-6",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319/639819",
series = "Palgrave Studies in Globalization, Culture and Society",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",
pages = "215--240",
editor = "Esther Peeren and Robin Celikates and {de Kloet}, Jeroen and Poell, {Thomas }",
booktitle = "Global Cultures of Contestation",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Dreher, T, Waller, L & MCCALLUM, K 2017, Disruption or transformation? Australian policymaking in the face of Indigenous contestation. in E Peeren, R Celikates, J de Kloet & T Poell (eds), Global Cultures of Contestation: Mobility, Sustainability, Aesthetics & Connectivity . Palgrave Studies in Globalization, Culture and Society, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 215-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63982-6

Disruption or transformation? Australian policymaking in the face of Indigenous contestation. / Dreher, Tanja; Waller, Lisa; MCCALLUM, Kerry.

Global Cultures of Contestation: Mobility, Sustainability, Aesthetics & Connectivity . ed. / Esther Peeren; Robin Celikates; Jeroen de Kloet; Thomas Poell. Cham, Switzerland : Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. p. 215-240 (Palgrave Studies in Globalization, Culture and Society).

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Disruption or transformation?

T2 - Australian policymaking in the face of Indigenous contestation

AU - Dreher, Tanja

AU - Waller, Lisa

AU - MCCALLUM, Kerry

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - From the Zapatista’s “netwar” to the “hashtag activism” of Idle No More, Indigenous peoples have pioneered digital media for global connectivity and contestation. This chapter explores the promise and the pitfalls of social media for First Nations protest in Australia. Overall, we find new opportunities for disruption and ongoing challenges with regard to significant social and political transformation. The argument is illustrated with two exemplars. Firstly, the “Recognise” campaign is a state-sponsored public information and awareness campaign with a well-developed social media and branding strategy. Dissenting Indigenous voices have been highly successful in disrupting this campaign and asserting an alternative agenda including Treaty and Land Rights. Secondly, the #IASLottery campaign responded to the new Indigenous Advancement Strategy, with less success in impacting policy debates.

AB - From the Zapatista’s “netwar” to the “hashtag activism” of Idle No More, Indigenous peoples have pioneered digital media for global connectivity and contestation. This chapter explores the promise and the pitfalls of social media for First Nations protest in Australia. Overall, we find new opportunities for disruption and ongoing challenges with regard to significant social and political transformation. The argument is illustrated with two exemplars. Firstly, the “Recognise” campaign is a state-sponsored public information and awareness campaign with a well-developed social media and branding strategy. Dissenting Indigenous voices have been highly successful in disrupting this campaign and asserting an alternative agenda including Treaty and Land Rights. Secondly, the #IASLottery campaign responded to the new Indigenous Advancement Strategy, with less success in impacting policy debates.

KW - Digital Disruption

KW - Indigenous policy

KW - Indigenous social media

KW - Indigenous recognition

UR - https://www.palgrave.com/gp/book/9783319639819

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-63982-6

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-63982-6

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783319/639819

T3 - Palgrave Studies in Globalization, Culture and Society

SP - 215

EP - 240

BT - Global Cultures of Contestation

A2 - Peeren, Esther

A2 - Celikates, Robin

A2 - de Kloet, Jeroen

A2 - Poell, Thomas

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

CY - Cham, Switzerland

ER -

Dreher T, Waller L, MCCALLUM K. Disruption or transformation? Australian policymaking in the face of Indigenous contestation. In Peeren E, Celikates R, de Kloet J, Poell T, editors, Global Cultures of Contestation: Mobility, Sustainability, Aesthetics & Connectivity . Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. 2017. p. 215-240. (Palgrave Studies in Globalization, Culture and Society). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63982-6