Distorted perception of the spatial distribution of plant diversity through uneven collecting efforts: the example of Asteraceae in Australia

Alexander Schmidt-Lebuhn, Nunzio Knerr, Carlos Gonzalez-Orozco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim - Our aims were (1) to compare observed, estimated and predicted patterns of species richness using the Australian native Asteraceae as an example, (2) to identify candidates for hotspots of diversity for the study group, and (3) to examine the distortion of our perception of the spatial distribution of species richness through uneven or misdirected sampling efforts. Location - Australia. Methods - Based on data from Australia's Virtual Herbarium, we calculated and visualized observed species richness, the Chaol estimate of richness, the C index of collecting completeness, and an estimate of richness derived from environmental niche modelling for grid cells at a resolution of 1o. The 20 cells with the highest diversity values were used to define hotspots of diversity. Results - Uneven collecting activity results in misleading diversity patterns for the family Asteraceae. While observed species richness is much higher in central Australia than in other parts of the arid interior, this is an artefact resulting from the area being a hotspot of collecting activity. The mountain ranges of southeastern Australia and Tasmania are candidates for unbiased hotspots of species richness. Main conclusions - Vast areas of the Australian interior are insufficiently sampled on a local scale, although most of them can be expected to be relatively species poor. Some areas in the south-east and south-west of the continent remain undersampled relative to their high species richness. Observed species numbers, estimators and environmental niche-modelling all have their unique advantages and disadvantages for the inference of patterns of diversity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2072-2080
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Biogeography
Volume39
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Asteraceae
species richness
spatial distribution
species diversity
niche
niches
herbarium
Tasmania
herbaria
modeling
artifact
mountains
cells
sampling

Cite this

@article{861990735dac4effb2c2f0a98637763e,
title = "Distorted perception of the spatial distribution of plant diversity through uneven collecting efforts: the example of Asteraceae in Australia",
abstract = "Aim - Our aims were (1) to compare observed, estimated and predicted patterns of species richness using the Australian native Asteraceae as an example, (2) to identify candidates for hotspots of diversity for the study group, and (3) to examine the distortion of our perception of the spatial distribution of species richness through uneven or misdirected sampling efforts. Location - Australia. Methods - Based on data from Australia's Virtual Herbarium, we calculated and visualized observed species richness, the Chaol estimate of richness, the C index of collecting completeness, and an estimate of richness derived from environmental niche modelling for grid cells at a resolution of 1o. The 20 cells with the highest diversity values were used to define hotspots of diversity. Results - Uneven collecting activity results in misleading diversity patterns for the family Asteraceae. While observed species richness is much higher in central Australia than in other parts of the arid interior, this is an artefact resulting from the area being a hotspot of collecting activity. The mountain ranges of southeastern Australia and Tasmania are candidates for unbiased hotspots of species richness. Main conclusions - Vast areas of the Australian interior are insufficiently sampled on a local scale, although most of them can be expected to be relatively species poor. Some areas in the south-east and south-west of the continent remain undersampled relative to their high species richness. Observed species numbers, estimators and environmental niche-modelling all have their unique advantages and disadvantages for the inference of patterns of diversity.",
keywords = "Asteraceae, Australia, biodiversity hotspots, collection intensity, Compositae, conservation biogeography, diversity estimator, environmental niche modelling, sampling biases, species richness.",
author = "Alexander Schmidt-Lebuhn and Nunzio Knerr and Carlos Gonzalez-Orozco",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02756.x",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "2072--2080",
journal = "Journal of Biogeography",
issn = "0305-0270",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

Distorted perception of the spatial distribution of plant diversity through uneven collecting efforts: the example of Asteraceae in Australia. / Schmidt-Lebuhn, Alexander; Knerr, Nunzio; Gonzalez-Orozco, Carlos.

In: Journal of Biogeography, Vol. 39, 2012, p. 2072-2080.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distorted perception of the spatial distribution of plant diversity through uneven collecting efforts: the example of Asteraceae in Australia

AU - Schmidt-Lebuhn, Alexander

AU - Knerr, Nunzio

AU - Gonzalez-Orozco, Carlos

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Aim - Our aims were (1) to compare observed, estimated and predicted patterns of species richness using the Australian native Asteraceae as an example, (2) to identify candidates for hotspots of diversity for the study group, and (3) to examine the distortion of our perception of the spatial distribution of species richness through uneven or misdirected sampling efforts. Location - Australia. Methods - Based on data from Australia's Virtual Herbarium, we calculated and visualized observed species richness, the Chaol estimate of richness, the C index of collecting completeness, and an estimate of richness derived from environmental niche modelling for grid cells at a resolution of 1o. The 20 cells with the highest diversity values were used to define hotspots of diversity. Results - Uneven collecting activity results in misleading diversity patterns for the family Asteraceae. While observed species richness is much higher in central Australia than in other parts of the arid interior, this is an artefact resulting from the area being a hotspot of collecting activity. The mountain ranges of southeastern Australia and Tasmania are candidates for unbiased hotspots of species richness. Main conclusions - Vast areas of the Australian interior are insufficiently sampled on a local scale, although most of them can be expected to be relatively species poor. Some areas in the south-east and south-west of the continent remain undersampled relative to their high species richness. Observed species numbers, estimators and environmental niche-modelling all have their unique advantages and disadvantages for the inference of patterns of diversity.

AB - Aim - Our aims were (1) to compare observed, estimated and predicted patterns of species richness using the Australian native Asteraceae as an example, (2) to identify candidates for hotspots of diversity for the study group, and (3) to examine the distortion of our perception of the spatial distribution of species richness through uneven or misdirected sampling efforts. Location - Australia. Methods - Based on data from Australia's Virtual Herbarium, we calculated and visualized observed species richness, the Chaol estimate of richness, the C index of collecting completeness, and an estimate of richness derived from environmental niche modelling for grid cells at a resolution of 1o. The 20 cells with the highest diversity values were used to define hotspots of diversity. Results - Uneven collecting activity results in misleading diversity patterns for the family Asteraceae. While observed species richness is much higher in central Australia than in other parts of the arid interior, this is an artefact resulting from the area being a hotspot of collecting activity. The mountain ranges of southeastern Australia and Tasmania are candidates for unbiased hotspots of species richness. Main conclusions - Vast areas of the Australian interior are insufficiently sampled on a local scale, although most of them can be expected to be relatively species poor. Some areas in the south-east and south-west of the continent remain undersampled relative to their high species richness. Observed species numbers, estimators and environmental niche-modelling all have their unique advantages and disadvantages for the inference of patterns of diversity.

KW - Asteraceae

KW - Australia

KW - biodiversity hotspots

KW - collection intensity

KW - Compositae

KW - conservation biogeography

KW - diversity estimator

KW - environmental niche modelling

KW - sampling biases

KW - species richness.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02756.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02756.x

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 2072

EP - 2080

JO - Journal of Biogeography

JF - Journal of Biogeography

SN - 0305-0270

ER -