Abstract
Visual systems adapt to different light environments through several avenues including optical changes to the eye and neurological changes in how light signals are processed and interpreted. Spectral sensitivity can evolve via changes to visual pigments housed in the retinal photoreceptors through gene duplication and loss, differential and coexpression, and sequence evolution. Frogs provide an excellent, yet understudied, system for visual evolution research due to their diversity of ecologies (including biphasic aquatic-terrestrial life cycles) that we hypothesize imposed different selective pressures leading to adaptive evolution of the visual system, notably the opsins that encode the protein component of the visual pigments responsible for the first step in visual perception. Here, we analyze the diversity and evolution of visual opsin genes from 93 new eye transcriptomes plus published data for a combined dataset spanning 122 frog species and 34 families. We find that most species express the four visual opsins previously identified in frogs but show evidence for gene loss in two lineages. Further, we present evidence of positive selection in three opsins and shifts in selective pressures associated with differences in habitat and life history, but not activity pattern. We identify substantial novel variation in the visual opsins and, using microspectrophotometry, find highly variable spectral sensitivities, expanding known ranges for all frog visual pigments. Mutations at spectral-tuning sites only partially account for this variation, suggesting that frogs have used tuning pathways that are unique among vertebrates. These results support the hypothesis of adaptive evolution in photoreceptor physiology across the frog tree of life in response to varying environmental and ecological factors and further our growing understanding of vertebrate visual evolution.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | msae049 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-23 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Molecular Biology and Evolution |
Volume | 41 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 4 Apr 2024 |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
In: Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol. 41, No. 4, msae049, 04.04.2024, p. 1-23.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Diversity and Evolution of Frog Visual Opsins
T2 - Spectral Tuning and Adaptation to Distinct Light Environments
AU - Schott, Ryan K.
AU - Fujita, Matthew K.
AU - Streicher, Jeffrey W.
AU - Gower, David J.
AU - Thomas, Kate N.
AU - Loew, Ellis R.
AU - Bamba Kaya, Abraham G.
AU - Bittencourt-Silva, Gabriela B.
AU - Guillherme Becker, C.
AU - Cisneros-Heredia, Diego
AU - Clulow, Simon
AU - Davila, Mateo
AU - Firneno, Thomas J.
AU - Haddad, Célio F.B.
AU - Janssenswillen, Sunita
AU - Labisko, Jim
AU - Maddock, Simon T.
AU - Mahony, Michael
AU - Martins, Renato A.
AU - Michaels, Christopher J.
AU - Mitchell, Nicola J.
AU - Portik, Daniel M.
AU - Prates, Ivan
AU - Roelants, Kim
AU - Roelke, Corey
AU - Tobi, Elie
AU - Woolfolk, Maya
AU - Bell, Rayna C.
N1 - Funding Information: We thank the following field companions and colleagues who helped obtain specimens for this work and/or hosted us in their labs: Hannah Augustijnen, Lyle Britt, Itzue Calviedes Solis, Patrick Campbell, Paul Doughty, Juvencio Eko Mengue, Carl Franklin, Carolina Reyes-Puig, Philippe Gaucher, Ivan Gomez-Mestre, Shakuntala Devi Gopal, Jon and Krittee Gower, Anthony Herrel, Simon Loader, Matthew McElroy, Justino Nguema Mituy, Diego Moura, Martin Nsue, Santiago Ron, Lauren Scheinberg, Bruno Sim\u00F5es, Ben Tapley, Miguel Trefaut Rodrigues, Rose Upton, Mark Wilkinson, and Molly Womack. We thank the Gabon Biodiversity Program and Bioko Biodiversity Protection Program for logistical support in the field; Grant Webster, Scott Keogh, and Jared Grummer for advice on where to find key species; and Jodi Rowley and Stephen Mahony for exporting tissues for analysis. We also thank Brian Gratwicke, Klaus-Peter Koepfli, Austin Mudd, and Dan Rokhsar for providing early access to the Atelopus zeteki genome assembly. Sampling was conducted following IACUC protocols (NHMUK, NMNH 2016-012, UNESP Rio Claro CEUA-23/2017, UTA A17.005, ANU A2017/47, UWA Animal Ethics Committee 06-100-586) and with scientific research authorizations (USA: Texas Parks and Wildlife Division SR-0814-159, North Cascades National Parks NCCO-2018-SCI-0009. Brazil: ICMBio MMA 22511-4, ICMBio SISBIO 22511-5, 30309-12. United Kingdom: NE License WML-OR04. French Guiana: RAA:R03-2018-06-12-006. Gabon: CENAREST AR0020/17. Australia: New South Wales National Parks & Wildlife Service SL102014, Queensland Department of National Parks WITK18705517, Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife SF005585. Equatorial Guinea: INDEFOR-AP 0130/020-2019). This research was supported by grants from the Natural Environment Research Council, UK (NE/R002150/1) and the National Science Foundation (DEB-1655751), as well as an NSERC Discovery Grant (to R.K.S.). M.W. was supported by the NMNH Natural History Research Experience REU program (NSF-OCE:1560088). Portions of the computational analyses were conducted on the Smithsonian Institution High Performance Cluster (SI/ HPC; https://doi.org/10.25572/SIHPC). This is Smithsonian Institution, Gabon Biodiversity Program contribution number 209. Finally, the authors thank two anonymous reviewers for constructive feedback that substantially improved the manuscript. Funding Information: We thank the following field companions and colleagues who helped obtain specimens for this work and/or hosted us in their labs: Hannah Augustijnen, Lyle Britt, Itzue Calviedes Solis, Patrick Campbell, Paul Doughty, Juvencio Eko Mengue, Carl Franklin, Carolina Reyes-Puig, Philippe Gaucher, Ivan Gomez-Mestre, Shakuntala Devi Gopal, Jon and Krittee Gower, Anthony Herrel, Simon Loader, Matthew McElroy, Justino Nguema Mituy, Diego Moura, Martin Nsue, Santiago Ron, Lauren Scheinberg, Bruno Simo\u0303es, Ben Tapley, Miguel Trefaut Rodrigues, Rose Upton, Mark Wilkinson, and Molly Womack. We thank the Gabon Biodiversity Program and Bioko Biodiversity Protection Program for logistical support in the field; Grant Webster, Scott Keogh, and Jared Grummer for advice on where to find key species; and Jodi Rowley and Stephen Mahony for exporting tissues for analysis. We also thank Brian Gratwicke, Klaus-Peter Koepfli, Austin Mudd, and Dan Rokhsar for providing early access to the Atelopus zeteki genome assembly. Sampling was conducted following IACUC protocols (NHMUK, NMNH 2016-012, UNESP Rio Claro CEUA-23/2017, UTA A17.005, ANU A2017/47, UWA Animal Ethics Committee 06-100-586) and with scientific research authorizations (USA: Texas Parks and Wildlife Division SR-0814-159, North Cascades National Parks NCCO-2018-SCI-0009. Brazil: ICMBio MMA 22511-4, ICMBio SISBIO 22511-5, 30309-12. United Kingdom: NE License WML-OR04. French Guiana: RAA:R03-2018-06-12-006. Gabon: CENAREST AR0020/17. Australia: New South Wales National Parks & Wildlife Service SL102014, Queensland Department of National Parks WITK18705517, Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife SF005585. Equatorial Guinea: INDEFOR-AP 0130/020-2019). This research was supported by grants from the Natural Environment Research Council, UK (NE/R002150/1) and the National Science Foundation (DEB-1655751), as well as an NSERC Discovery Grant (to R.K.S.). M.W. was supported by the NMNH Natural History Research Experience REU program (NSF-OCE:1560088). Portions of the computational analyses were conducted on the Smithsonian Institution High Performance Cluster (SI/HPC; https://doi.org/10.25572/SIHPC ). This is Smithsonian Institution, Gabon Biodiversity Program contribution number 209. Finally, the authors thank two anonymous reviewers for constructive feedback that substantially improved the manuscript. Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/4/4
Y1 - 2024/4/4
N2 - Visual systems adapt to different light environments through several avenues including optical changes to the eye and neurological changes in how light signals are processed and interpreted. Spectral sensitivity can evolve via changes to visual pigments housed in the retinal photoreceptors through gene duplication and loss, differential and coexpression, and sequence evolution. Frogs provide an excellent, yet understudied, system for visual evolution research due to their diversity of ecologies (including biphasic aquatic-terrestrial life cycles) that we hypothesize imposed different selective pressures leading to adaptive evolution of the visual system, notably the opsins that encode the protein component of the visual pigments responsible for the first step in visual perception. Here, we analyze the diversity and evolution of visual opsin genes from 93 new eye transcriptomes plus published data for a combined dataset spanning 122 frog species and 34 families. We find that most species express the four visual opsins previously identified in frogs but show evidence for gene loss in two lineages. Further, we present evidence of positive selection in three opsins and shifts in selective pressures associated with differences in habitat and life history, but not activity pattern. We identify substantial novel variation in the visual opsins and, using microspectrophotometry, find highly variable spectral sensitivities, expanding known ranges for all frog visual pigments. Mutations at spectral-tuning sites only partially account for this variation, suggesting that frogs have used tuning pathways that are unique among vertebrates. These results support the hypothesis of adaptive evolution in photoreceptor physiology across the frog tree of life in response to varying environmental and ecological factors and further our growing understanding of vertebrate visual evolution.
AB - Visual systems adapt to different light environments through several avenues including optical changes to the eye and neurological changes in how light signals are processed and interpreted. Spectral sensitivity can evolve via changes to visual pigments housed in the retinal photoreceptors through gene duplication and loss, differential and coexpression, and sequence evolution. Frogs provide an excellent, yet understudied, system for visual evolution research due to their diversity of ecologies (including biphasic aquatic-terrestrial life cycles) that we hypothesize imposed different selective pressures leading to adaptive evolution of the visual system, notably the opsins that encode the protein component of the visual pigments responsible for the first step in visual perception. Here, we analyze the diversity and evolution of visual opsin genes from 93 new eye transcriptomes plus published data for a combined dataset spanning 122 frog species and 34 families. We find that most species express the four visual opsins previously identified in frogs but show evidence for gene loss in two lineages. Further, we present evidence of positive selection in three opsins and shifts in selective pressures associated with differences in habitat and life history, but not activity pattern. We identify substantial novel variation in the visual opsins and, using microspectrophotometry, find highly variable spectral sensitivities, expanding known ranges for all frog visual pigments. Mutations at spectral-tuning sites only partially account for this variation, suggesting that frogs have used tuning pathways that are unique among vertebrates. These results support the hypothesis of adaptive evolution in photoreceptor physiology across the frog tree of life in response to varying environmental and ecological factors and further our growing understanding of vertebrate visual evolution.
KW - amphibia
KW - codon-based selection models
KW - sensory biology
KW - vision research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190072350&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/molbev/msae049
DO - 10.1093/molbev/msae049
M3 - Article
C2 - 38573520
SN - 0737-4038
VL - 41
SP - 1
EP - 23
JO - Molecular Biology and Evolution
JF - Molecular Biology and Evolution
IS - 4
M1 - msae049
ER -