Abstract
DNA identification developed late in the twentieth century and has surpassed fingerprinting as the leading technique for forensic human identification. It differs from the other biometrics discussed in that it is based on principles of biological, rather than physical sciences. Another difference is the time taken to convert a biological sample into a DNA profile; however, this is becoming less significant as technology progresses. DNA is also more accurate and revealing in comparison with other biometrics because it can provide information about a person’s physical appearance and health status, as well as link an individual to, and in association with further investigations, identify, their biological relatives. This chapter examines DNA identification in law enforcement, related developments associated with commercial genomic health and ancestry databases, and the potential impact of population wide DNA collection. The ethical analysis considers privacy and autonomy, self-incrimination, joint rights and collective responsibility.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Biometric Identification, Law and Ethics |
| Editors | Marcus Smith, Seumas Miller |
| Place of Publication | Switzerland |
| Publisher | Springer |
| Pages | 39-55 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9783030902568 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783030902551 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Publication series
| Name | SpringerBriefs in Ethics |
|---|---|
| ISSN (Print) | 2211-8101 |
| ISSN (Electronic) | 2211-811X |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'DNA Identification, Joint Rights and Collective Responsibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver