Do climate envelope models transfer? A manipulative test using dung beetle introductions

Richard DUNCAN, Phillip Cassey, Tim Blackburn

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    74 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Climate envelope models (CEMs) are widely used to forecast future shifts in species ranges under climate change, but these models are rarely validated against independent data, and their fundamental assumption that climate limits species distributions is rarely tested. Here, we use the data on the introduction of five South African dung beetle species to Australia to test whether CEMs developed in the native range can predict distribution in the introduced range, where the confounding effects of dispersal limitation, resource limitation and the impact of natural enemies have been removed, leaving climate as the dominant constraint. For two of the five species, models developed in the native range predict distribution in the introduced range about as well as models developed in the introduced range where we know climate limits distribution. For the remaining three species, models developed in the native range perform poorly, implying that non-climatic factors limit the native distribution of these species and need to be accounted for in species distribution models. Quantifying relevant non-climatic factors and their likely interactions with climatic variables for forecasting range shifts under climate change remains a challenging task.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1449-1457
    Number of pages9
    JournalRoyal Society of London. Proceedings B. Biological Sciences
    Volume267
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Fingerprint

    dung beetles
    Beetles
    Climate
    beetle
    climate modeling
    climate
    Climate Change
    testing
    biogeography
    Climate change
    climate change
    natural enemy
    test
    natural enemies
    distribution
    resource

    Cite this

    @article{250a89d880524ec398e5a6516eca19d1,
    title = "Do climate envelope models transfer? A manipulative test using dung beetle introductions",
    abstract = "Climate envelope models (CEMs) are widely used to forecast future shifts in species ranges under climate change, but these models are rarely validated against independent data, and their fundamental assumption that climate limits species distributions is rarely tested. Here, we use the data on the introduction of five South African dung beetle species to Australia to test whether CEMs developed in the native range can predict distribution in the introduced range, where the confounding effects of dispersal limitation, resource limitation and the impact of natural enemies have been removed, leaving climate as the dominant constraint. For two of the five species, models developed in the native range predict distribution in the introduced range about as well as models developed in the introduced range where we know climate limits distribution. For the remaining three species, models developed in the native range perform poorly, implying that non-climatic factors limit the native distribution of these species and need to be accounted for in species distribution models. Quantifying relevant non-climatic factors and their likely interactions with climatic variables for forecasting range shifts under climate change remains a challenging task.",
    keywords = "species distribution models, bioclimatic envelope, dispersal limitation, range limits.",
    author = "Richard DUNCAN and Phillip Cassey and Tim Blackburn",
    year = "2009",
    doi = "10.1098/rspb.2008.1801",
    language = "English",
    volume = "267",
    pages = "1449--1457",
    journal = "Royal Society of London. Proceedings B. Biological Sciences",
    issn = "0962-8452",
    publisher = "Royal Society of London",

    }

    Do climate envelope models transfer? A manipulative test using dung beetle introductions. / DUNCAN, Richard; Cassey, Phillip; Blackburn, Tim.

    In: Royal Society of London. Proceedings B. Biological Sciences, Vol. 267, 2009, p. 1449-1457.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Do climate envelope models transfer? A manipulative test using dung beetle introductions

    AU - DUNCAN, Richard

    AU - Cassey, Phillip

    AU - Blackburn, Tim

    PY - 2009

    Y1 - 2009

    N2 - Climate envelope models (CEMs) are widely used to forecast future shifts in species ranges under climate change, but these models are rarely validated against independent data, and their fundamental assumption that climate limits species distributions is rarely tested. Here, we use the data on the introduction of five South African dung beetle species to Australia to test whether CEMs developed in the native range can predict distribution in the introduced range, where the confounding effects of dispersal limitation, resource limitation and the impact of natural enemies have been removed, leaving climate as the dominant constraint. For two of the five species, models developed in the native range predict distribution in the introduced range about as well as models developed in the introduced range where we know climate limits distribution. For the remaining three species, models developed in the native range perform poorly, implying that non-climatic factors limit the native distribution of these species and need to be accounted for in species distribution models. Quantifying relevant non-climatic factors and their likely interactions with climatic variables for forecasting range shifts under climate change remains a challenging task.

    AB - Climate envelope models (CEMs) are widely used to forecast future shifts in species ranges under climate change, but these models are rarely validated against independent data, and their fundamental assumption that climate limits species distributions is rarely tested. Here, we use the data on the introduction of five South African dung beetle species to Australia to test whether CEMs developed in the native range can predict distribution in the introduced range, where the confounding effects of dispersal limitation, resource limitation and the impact of natural enemies have been removed, leaving climate as the dominant constraint. For two of the five species, models developed in the native range predict distribution in the introduced range about as well as models developed in the introduced range where we know climate limits distribution. For the remaining three species, models developed in the native range perform poorly, implying that non-climatic factors limit the native distribution of these species and need to be accounted for in species distribution models. Quantifying relevant non-climatic factors and their likely interactions with climatic variables for forecasting range shifts under climate change remains a challenging task.

    KW - species distribution models

    KW - bioclimatic envelope

    KW - dispersal limitation

    KW - range limits.

    U2 - 10.1098/rspb.2008.1801

    DO - 10.1098/rspb.2008.1801

    M3 - Article

    VL - 267

    SP - 1449

    EP - 1457

    JO - Royal Society of London. Proceedings B. Biological Sciences

    JF - Royal Society of London. Proceedings B. Biological Sciences

    SN - 0962-8452

    ER -