Do climate envelope models transfer? A manipulative test using dung beetle introductions

Richard DUNCAN, Phillip Cassey, Tim Blackburn

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    78 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Climate envelope models (CEMs) are widely used to forecast future shifts in species ranges under climate change, but these models are rarely validated against independent data, and their fundamental assumption that climate limits species distributions is rarely tested. Here, we use the data on the introduction of five South African dung beetle species to Australia to test whether CEMs developed in the native range can predict distribution in the introduced range, where the confounding effects of dispersal limitation, resource limitation and the impact of natural enemies have been removed, leaving climate as the dominant constraint. For two of the five species, models developed in the native range predict distribution in the introduced range about as well as models developed in the introduced range where we know climate limits distribution. For the remaining three species, models developed in the native range perform poorly, implying that non-climatic factors limit the native distribution of these species and need to be accounted for in species distribution models. Quantifying relevant non-climatic factors and their likely interactions with climatic variables for forecasting range shifts under climate change remains a challenging task.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1449-1457
    Number of pages9
    JournalRoyal Society of London. Proceedings B. Biological Sciences
    Volume267
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Do climate envelope models transfer? A manipulative test using dung beetle introductions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this