Do juries adequately represent the community? A case study of civil juires in Victoria

Jacqueline Horan, David Tait

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It is sometimes argued that juries do not represent an adequate cross-section of the community. They are selected from those who can serve rather than those who should serve. Numerous exemptions, exclusions and challenges available under the jury system are thought to interfere so much with the random selection process that the chosen jury becomes unrepresentative of the community. A recent survey of Victorian civil jurors has enabled the authors to test this criticism empirically. The study showed that juries are a fair cross-section of the community in terms of gender and age. Jurors from non English-speaking backgrounds are marginally under-represented while university educated citizens are over-represented on civil juries. Possible explanations and interpretations for these findings are offered
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-199
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Judicial Administration
Volume16
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

community
exemption
speaking
criticism
exclusion
citizen
interpretation
university
gender

Cite this

@article{73f837ba00b04d569a960dfcbdc885eb,
title = "Do juries adequately represent the community? A case study of civil juires in Victoria",
abstract = "It is sometimes argued that juries do not represent an adequate cross-section of the community. They are selected from those who can serve rather than those who should serve. Numerous exemptions, exclusions and challenges available under the jury system are thought to interfere so much with the random selection process that the chosen jury becomes unrepresentative of the community. A recent survey of Victorian civil jurors has enabled the authors to test this criticism empirically. The study showed that juries are a fair cross-section of the community in terms of gender and age. Jurors from non English-speaking backgrounds are marginally under-represented while university educated citizens are over-represented on civil juries. Possible explanations and interpretations for these findings are offered",
author = "Jacqueline Horan and David Tait",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "179--199",
journal = "Journal of Judicial Administration",
issn = "1036-7918",
number = "3",

}

Do juries adequately represent the community? A case study of civil juires in Victoria. / Horan, Jacqueline; Tait, David.

In: Journal of Judicial Administration, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2007, p. 179-199.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do juries adequately represent the community? A case study of civil juires in Victoria

AU - Horan, Jacqueline

AU - Tait, David

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - It is sometimes argued that juries do not represent an adequate cross-section of the community. They are selected from those who can serve rather than those who should serve. Numerous exemptions, exclusions and challenges available under the jury system are thought to interfere so much with the random selection process that the chosen jury becomes unrepresentative of the community. A recent survey of Victorian civil jurors has enabled the authors to test this criticism empirically. The study showed that juries are a fair cross-section of the community in terms of gender and age. Jurors from non English-speaking backgrounds are marginally under-represented while university educated citizens are over-represented on civil juries. Possible explanations and interpretations for these findings are offered

AB - It is sometimes argued that juries do not represent an adequate cross-section of the community. They are selected from those who can serve rather than those who should serve. Numerous exemptions, exclusions and challenges available under the jury system are thought to interfere so much with the random selection process that the chosen jury becomes unrepresentative of the community. A recent survey of Victorian civil jurors has enabled the authors to test this criticism empirically. The study showed that juries are a fair cross-section of the community in terms of gender and age. Jurors from non English-speaking backgrounds are marginally under-represented while university educated citizens are over-represented on civil juries. Possible explanations and interpretations for these findings are offered

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 179

EP - 199

JO - Journal of Judicial Administration

JF - Journal of Judicial Administration

SN - 1036-7918

IS - 3

ER -