Do preferential trade agreements provide reasonable insurance?

Craig APPLEGATE, Chris SADLEIR

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Preferential trade agreements have been criticised for not increasing economic welfare relative to the status quo. In this article, we suggest that even if this is the case, they offer a reasonable form of insurance against possible adverse trade or investment policies in the future. In Australia, preferential trade agreements have been controversial with the release of a Productivity Commission report in 2010 and the commonwealth government's response to it in 2011. A particularly controversial aspect of such agreements is whether they should include investor-state dispute resolution mechanisms which are often considered unnecessary in a country subject to the rule of law.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)389-399
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Public Policy
Volume9
Issue number4/5/6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Sep 2013

Fingerprint

investment policy
welfare economics
trade policy
constitutional state
investor
insurance
productivity

Cite this

@article{64d17588cfd444df9c1298c8c441d2f3,
title = "Do preferential trade agreements provide reasonable insurance?",
abstract = "Preferential trade agreements have been criticised for not increasing economic welfare relative to the status quo. In this article, we suggest that even if this is the case, they offer a reasonable form of insurance against possible adverse trade or investment policies in the future. In Australia, preferential trade agreements have been controversial with the release of a Productivity Commission report in 2010 and the commonwealth government's response to it in 2011. A particularly controversial aspect of such agreements is whether they should include investor-state dispute resolution mechanisms which are often considered unnecessary in a country subject to the rule of law.",
keywords = "Preferential trade agreements, free trade agreements, international trade, Foreign investment, Free trade agreements, IPPAs, International trade, Investment promotion and protection agreements, PTAs, Public policy, Reasonable insurance, Regional trade agreements",
author = "Craig APPLEGATE and Chris SADLEIR",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1504/IJPP.2013.056583",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "389--399",
journal = "International Journal of Public Policy",
issn = "1740-0600",
publisher = "Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.",
number = "4/5/6",

}

Do preferential trade agreements provide reasonable insurance? / APPLEGATE, Craig; SADLEIR, Chris.

In: International Journal of Public Policy, Vol. 9, No. 4/5/6, 27.09.2013, p. 389-399.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do preferential trade agreements provide reasonable insurance?

AU - APPLEGATE, Craig

AU - SADLEIR, Chris

PY - 2013/9/27

Y1 - 2013/9/27

N2 - Preferential trade agreements have been criticised for not increasing economic welfare relative to the status quo. In this article, we suggest that even if this is the case, they offer a reasonable form of insurance against possible adverse trade or investment policies in the future. In Australia, preferential trade agreements have been controversial with the release of a Productivity Commission report in 2010 and the commonwealth government's response to it in 2011. A particularly controversial aspect of such agreements is whether they should include investor-state dispute resolution mechanisms which are often considered unnecessary in a country subject to the rule of law.

AB - Preferential trade agreements have been criticised for not increasing economic welfare relative to the status quo. In this article, we suggest that even if this is the case, they offer a reasonable form of insurance against possible adverse trade or investment policies in the future. In Australia, preferential trade agreements have been controversial with the release of a Productivity Commission report in 2010 and the commonwealth government's response to it in 2011. A particularly controversial aspect of such agreements is whether they should include investor-state dispute resolution mechanisms which are often considered unnecessary in a country subject to the rule of law.

KW - Preferential trade agreements

KW - free trade agreements

KW - international trade

KW - Foreign investment

KW - Free trade agreements

KW - IPPAs

KW - International trade

KW - Investment promotion and protection agreements

KW - PTAs

KW - Public policy

KW - Reasonable insurance

KW - Regional trade agreements

U2 - 10.1504/IJPP.2013.056583

DO - 10.1504/IJPP.2013.056583

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 389

EP - 399

JO - International Journal of Public Policy

JF - International Journal of Public Policy

SN - 1740-0600

IS - 4/5/6

ER -