Do We Think Children Need a Mom and Dad?

Understanding How Gender Ideology Impact Attitudes Toward Same-Gender Parent Family Rights

Stephanie N. Webb, Jill M. Chonody, Phillip S. Kavanagh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research and opinion polls demonstrate that attitudes toward same-gender parent families have been improving in recent years among Western countries; however, the history of oppression toward, and misconceptions about, same-gender parent families continue to be demonstrated in Australian family rights policies. Common misconceptions include the belief that children need both male and female role models, and this could be influencing peoples’ support for same-gender family rights and having a wider impact on legislation change. Yet a dearth of research exists exploring a connection between gender role beliefs and support for same-gender family rights using a broad international sample, including Australia. To investigate this connection, a sample (N = 615) from 18 English-speaking countries responded to a series of questions to determine the importance of gender norm beliefs on same-gender family prejudice. Regression analysis demonstrated that people with traditional beliefs about gender norms were more likely to endorse a negative attitude toward same-gender marriage and same-gender parenting. Findings suggest a link between socially prescribed gender norms and prejudice toward same-gender parent families that may be fueling arguments against same-gender family rights policies. The implications of these findings on same-gender parent families and their rights require future investigation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1351-1371
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Homosexuality
Volume65
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Aug 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

parents
ideology
gender
Family Planning Policy
prejudice
opinion poll
role model
Parenting
oppression
gender role
Marriage
Legislation
Research
speaking
regression analysis
marriage
legislation
History
Regression Analysis

Cite this

@article{c17e814232384c909b1ddd3b2f11898b,
title = "Do We Think Children Need a Mom and Dad?: Understanding How Gender Ideology Impact Attitudes Toward Same-Gender Parent Family Rights",
abstract = "Research and opinion polls demonstrate that attitudes toward same-gender parent families have been improving in recent years among Western countries; however, the history of oppression toward, and misconceptions about, same-gender parent families continue to be demonstrated in Australian family rights policies. Common misconceptions include the belief that children need both male and female role models, and this could be influencing peoples’ support for same-gender family rights and having a wider impact on legislation change. Yet a dearth of research exists exploring a connection between gender role beliefs and support for same-gender family rights using a broad international sample, including Australia. To investigate this connection, a sample (N = 615) from 18 English-speaking countries responded to a series of questions to determine the importance of gender norm beliefs on same-gender family prejudice. Regression analysis demonstrated that people with traditional beliefs about gender norms were more likely to endorse a negative attitude toward same-gender marriage and same-gender parenting. Findings suggest a link between socially prescribed gender norms and prejudice toward same-gender parent families that may be fueling arguments against same-gender family rights policies. The implications of these findings on same-gender parent families and their rights require future investigation.",
keywords = "attitudes, gendered roles/ideology, Marriage equality, same-gender parent families, sexual prejudice",
author = "Webb, {Stephanie N.} and Chonody, {Jill M.} and Kavanagh, {Phillip S.}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1080/00918369.2017.1374071",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "1351--1371",
journal = "Journal of Homosexuality",
issn = "0091-8369",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "10",

}

Do We Think Children Need a Mom and Dad? Understanding How Gender Ideology Impact Attitudes Toward Same-Gender Parent Family Rights. / Webb, Stephanie N.; Chonody, Jill M.; Kavanagh, Phillip S.

In: Journal of Homosexuality, Vol. 65, No. 10, 24.08.2018, p. 1351-1371.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do We Think Children Need a Mom and Dad?

T2 - Understanding How Gender Ideology Impact Attitudes Toward Same-Gender Parent Family Rights

AU - Webb, Stephanie N.

AU - Chonody, Jill M.

AU - Kavanagh, Phillip S.

PY - 2018/8/24

Y1 - 2018/8/24

N2 - Research and opinion polls demonstrate that attitudes toward same-gender parent families have been improving in recent years among Western countries; however, the history of oppression toward, and misconceptions about, same-gender parent families continue to be demonstrated in Australian family rights policies. Common misconceptions include the belief that children need both male and female role models, and this could be influencing peoples’ support for same-gender family rights and having a wider impact on legislation change. Yet a dearth of research exists exploring a connection between gender role beliefs and support for same-gender family rights using a broad international sample, including Australia. To investigate this connection, a sample (N = 615) from 18 English-speaking countries responded to a series of questions to determine the importance of gender norm beliefs on same-gender family prejudice. Regression analysis demonstrated that people with traditional beliefs about gender norms were more likely to endorse a negative attitude toward same-gender marriage and same-gender parenting. Findings suggest a link between socially prescribed gender norms and prejudice toward same-gender parent families that may be fueling arguments against same-gender family rights policies. The implications of these findings on same-gender parent families and their rights require future investigation.

AB - Research and opinion polls demonstrate that attitudes toward same-gender parent families have been improving in recent years among Western countries; however, the history of oppression toward, and misconceptions about, same-gender parent families continue to be demonstrated in Australian family rights policies. Common misconceptions include the belief that children need both male and female role models, and this could be influencing peoples’ support for same-gender family rights and having a wider impact on legislation change. Yet a dearth of research exists exploring a connection between gender role beliefs and support for same-gender family rights using a broad international sample, including Australia. To investigate this connection, a sample (N = 615) from 18 English-speaking countries responded to a series of questions to determine the importance of gender norm beliefs on same-gender family prejudice. Regression analysis demonstrated that people with traditional beliefs about gender norms were more likely to endorse a negative attitude toward same-gender marriage and same-gender parenting. Findings suggest a link between socially prescribed gender norms and prejudice toward same-gender parent families that may be fueling arguments against same-gender family rights policies. The implications of these findings on same-gender parent families and their rights require future investigation.

KW - attitudes

KW - gendered roles/ideology

KW - Marriage equality

KW - same-gender parent families

KW - sexual prejudice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030151930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/we-think-children-need-mom-dad-understanding-gender-ideology-impact-attitudes-toward-samegender-pare

U2 - 10.1080/00918369.2017.1374071

DO - 10.1080/00918369.2017.1374071

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 1351

EP - 1371

JO - Journal of Homosexuality

JF - Journal of Homosexuality

SN - 0091-8369

IS - 10

ER -