Does Double Loop Learning Create Reliable Knowledge

Deborah Blackman, James Connelly, Steven Henderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper addresses doubts concerning the reliability of knowledge being created by double loop learning processes. Popper's ontological worlds are used to explore the philosophical basis of the way that individual experiences are turned into organisational knowledge, and such knowledge is used to generate organisational learning. The paper suggests that double loop learning may frequently create mistakes and fail to detect possible interesting lines of thought. Popper's work is used to suggest some solutions and an elaboration of the double loop learning process, but ultimately effective organisational learning is shown to depend on the undertaking of an epistemological burden by individuals above and beyond what is usually explicated in prescriptions for learning organisation and knowledge management
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-27
Number of pages17
JournalLearning Organization
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

learning organization
learning process
learning
knowledge management
medication
Double-loop learning
experience
Organizational learning
Learning process

Cite this

Blackman, Deborah ; Connelly, James ; Henderson, Steven. / Does Double Loop Learning Create Reliable Knowledge. In: Learning Organization. 2004 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 11-27.
@article{83e802c719e64e6689729a788c2e84f5,
title = "Does Double Loop Learning Create Reliable Knowledge",
abstract = "This paper addresses doubts concerning the reliability of knowledge being created by double loop learning processes. Popper's ontological worlds are used to explore the philosophical basis of the way that individual experiences are turned into organisational knowledge, and such knowledge is used to generate organisational learning. The paper suggests that double loop learning may frequently create mistakes and fail to detect possible interesting lines of thought. Popper's work is used to suggest some solutions and an elaboration of the double loop learning process, but ultimately effective organisational learning is shown to depend on the undertaking of an epistemological burden by individuals above and beyond what is usually explicated in prescriptions for learning organisation and knowledge management",
author = "Deborah Blackman and James Connelly and Steven Henderson",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1108/09696470410515706",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "11--27",
journal = "Learning Organization",
issn = "0969-6474",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Blackman, D, Connelly, J & Henderson, S 2004, 'Does Double Loop Learning Create Reliable Knowledge', Learning Organization, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470410515706

Does Double Loop Learning Create Reliable Knowledge. / Blackman, Deborah; Connelly, James; Henderson, Steven.

In: Learning Organization, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2004, p. 11-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does Double Loop Learning Create Reliable Knowledge

AU - Blackman, Deborah

AU - Connelly, James

AU - Henderson, Steven

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - This paper addresses doubts concerning the reliability of knowledge being created by double loop learning processes. Popper's ontological worlds are used to explore the philosophical basis of the way that individual experiences are turned into organisational knowledge, and such knowledge is used to generate organisational learning. The paper suggests that double loop learning may frequently create mistakes and fail to detect possible interesting lines of thought. Popper's work is used to suggest some solutions and an elaboration of the double loop learning process, but ultimately effective organisational learning is shown to depend on the undertaking of an epistemological burden by individuals above and beyond what is usually explicated in prescriptions for learning organisation and knowledge management

AB - This paper addresses doubts concerning the reliability of knowledge being created by double loop learning processes. Popper's ontological worlds are used to explore the philosophical basis of the way that individual experiences are turned into organisational knowledge, and such knowledge is used to generate organisational learning. The paper suggests that double loop learning may frequently create mistakes and fail to detect possible interesting lines of thought. Popper's work is used to suggest some solutions and an elaboration of the double loop learning process, but ultimately effective organisational learning is shown to depend on the undertaking of an epistemological burden by individuals above and beyond what is usually explicated in prescriptions for learning organisation and knowledge management

U2 - 10.1108/09696470410515706

DO - 10.1108/09696470410515706

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 11

EP - 27

JO - Learning Organization

JF - Learning Organization

SN - 0969-6474

IS - 1

ER -