TY - JOUR
T1 - Does performance measurement improve public sector performance?
T2 - A case of Australian government agencies
AU - Smith, Graham
AU - Halligan, John
AU - Mir, Monir
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the government departments that were the subject of this research for their willing cooperation. We also thank the two referees for their comments, which have led to strengthening and some restructuring of the paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Institute of Public Administration Australia
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - The paper investigates whether performance measurement drives performance improvement in Australian government agencies. Because the answer to such a question is rarely unconditional, contextual factors such as jurisdiction and type of organisation are considered. The paper uses documents such as budgets and annual reports of nine government agencies in three Australian jurisdictions to analyse how results against targets influence subsequent measured performance. It finds that performance measurement does not drive performance improvement for the agencies studied. The paper also explores two types of mechanism by which performance measurement might improve performance in Australian government agencies. One mechanism is that setting targets focuses effort leading to improved performance. A second mechanism assumes that policy intent plus resources leads to good performance measures, which produces better information and decisions and hence higher performance. No discernible impacts of these mechanisms on performance improvements in these agencies were observed. A systems-based approach to understanding the forces acting on managers and organisations showed that the mechanisms described above were less effective than countervailing influences that tended to derogate from the use of performance measurement.
AB - The paper investigates whether performance measurement drives performance improvement in Australian government agencies. Because the answer to such a question is rarely unconditional, contextual factors such as jurisdiction and type of organisation are considered. The paper uses documents such as budgets and annual reports of nine government agencies in three Australian jurisdictions to analyse how results against targets influence subsequent measured performance. It finds that performance measurement does not drive performance improvement for the agencies studied. The paper also explores two types of mechanism by which performance measurement might improve performance in Australian government agencies. One mechanism is that setting targets focuses effort leading to improved performance. A second mechanism assumes that policy intent plus resources leads to good performance measures, which produces better information and decisions and hence higher performance. No discernible impacts of these mechanisms on performance improvements in these agencies were observed. A systems-based approach to understanding the forces acting on managers and organisations showed that the mechanisms described above were less effective than countervailing influences that tended to derogate from the use of performance measurement.
KW - Australian government
KW - government agencies
KW - performance measurement
KW - public sector performance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105376322&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1467-8500.12481
DO - 10.1111/1467-8500.12481
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85105376322
SN - 0313-6647
VL - 80
SP - 713
EP - 731
JO - Australian Journal of Public Administration
JF - Australian Journal of Public Administration
IS - 4
ER -