Abstract
Investigations into the widespread possession of online child sexual abuse images reveal enormous variety in the types of images collected by adults with a sexual interest in children. While there is almost universal condemnation of the sexual exploitation of children through such images, it is not possible to define precisely what constitutes an illegal child sexual abuse image. This is because the concept is broad, changeable and, at the margins, elusive. Nonetheless, the use of criminal law to regulate any activity requires that the proscribed conduct be clearly defined. This paper reviews the ways in which child sexual abuse images can be categorised and, in particular, examines the impact of the viewer's perception on the definition of child pornography offences in Australia.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Australia |
| Publisher | Australian Institute of Criminology |
| Commissioning body | ACT Government |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Volume | 2005 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780642538778 |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Publication series
| Name | Trends and Issues |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Australian Institute of Criminology |
| ISSN (Print) | 0817-8542 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Does thinking make it so? Defining online child pornography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver