Doing Group Assessment: A Web Based Resource of Good Practice Case Studies

Peter Donnan; Coralie McCormack; Greg Battye; Ian Hart

Doing Group Assessment: A Web Based Resource of Good Practice Case Studies

Peter Donnan, Coralie McCormack, Greg Battye, Ian Hart

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in Book › Conference contribution › peer-review

Abstract

This paper reports on a national project, Doing Group Assessment, based at the University of Canberra and funded by the Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education Inc., now the Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC). The development of this web-based resource of good practice case-studies in group assessment in disciplines such as theatre, communication, film and theatre studies is outlined. The specific focus of the paper is on the question: Should a common group mark be awarded or should marks reflect differential inputs of group members? Five major strategies emerged from the case studies and these are described and contextualized within the discipline cluster

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Engaging Communities: Proceedings of the 31st HERDSA Annual Conference
Editors	Mark Barrow, Katheryn Sutherland
Place of Publication	New Zealand
Publisher	HERDSA
Pages	1-10
Number of pages	10
Volume	31
ISBN (Print)	9780908557736
Publication status	Published - 2008
Event	2008 HERDSA Annual Conference Engaging Communities - , New Zealand Duration: 1 Jul 2008 → 4 Jul 2008

Conference

Conference	2008 HERDSA Annual Conference Engaging Communities
Country/Territory	New Zealand
Period	1/07/08 → 4/07/08

Access to Document

http://www.herdsa.org.au/system/files/Donnan.pdf

Cite this

@inproceedings{12f24afd65e84e54b0039068ba723924,

title = "Doing Group Assessment: A Web Based Resource of Good Practice Case Studies",

abstract = "This paper reports on a national project, Doing Group Assessment, based at the University of Canberra and funded by the Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education Inc., now the Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC). The development of this web-based resource of good practice case-studies in group assessment in disciplines such as theatre, communication, film and theatre studies is outlined. The specific focus of the paper is on the question: Should a common group mark be awarded or should marks reflect differential inputs of group members? Five major strategies emerged from the case studies and these are described and contextualized within the discipline cluster",

author = "Peter Donnan and Coralie McCormack and Greg Battye and Ian Hart",

year = "2008",

language = "English",

isbn = "9780908557736",

volume = "31",

pages = "1--10",

editor = "Mark Barrow and Katheryn Sutherland",

booktitle = "Engaging Communities: Proceedings of the 31st HERDSA Annual Conference",

publisher = "HERDSA",

note = "2008 HERDSA Annual Conference Engaging Communities ; Conference date: 01-07-2008 Through 04-07-2008",

}

Donnan, P, McCormack, C, Battye, G & Hart, I 2008, Doing Group Assessment: A Web Based Resource of Good Practice Case Studies. in M Barrow & K Sutherland (eds), Engaging Communities: Proceedings of the 31st HERDSA Annual Conference. vol. 31, HERDSA, New Zealand, pp. 1-10, 2008 HERDSA Annual Conference Engaging Communities, New Zealand, 1/07/08. <http://www.herdsa.org.au/system/files/Donnan.pdf>

Doing Group Assessment: A Web Based Resource of Good Practice Case Studies. / Donnan, Peter; McCormack, Coralie; Battye, Greg et al.
Engaging Communities: Proceedings of the 31st HERDSA Annual Conference. ed. / Mark Barrow; Katheryn Sutherland. Vol. 31 New Zealand: HERDSA, 2008. p. 1-10.

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in Book › Conference contribution › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Doing Group Assessment: A Web Based Resource of Good Practice Case Studies

AU - Donnan, Peter

AU - McCormack, Coralie

AU - Battye, Greg

AU - Hart, Ian

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - This paper reports on a national project, Doing Group Assessment, based at the University of Canberra and funded by the Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education Inc., now the Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC). The development of this web-based resource of good practice case-studies in group assessment in disciplines such as theatre, communication, film and theatre studies is outlined. The specific focus of the paper is on the question: Should a common group mark be awarded or should marks reflect differential inputs of group members? Five major strategies emerged from the case studies and these are described and contextualized within the discipline cluster

AB - This paper reports on a national project, Doing Group Assessment, based at the University of Canberra and funded by the Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education Inc., now the Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC). The development of this web-based resource of good practice case-studies in group assessment in disciplines such as theatre, communication, film and theatre studies is outlined. The specific focus of the paper is on the question: Should a common group mark be awarded or should marks reflect differential inputs of group members? Five major strategies emerged from the case studies and these are described and contextualized within the discipline cluster

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9780908557736

VL - 31

SP - 1

EP - 10

BT - Engaging Communities: Proceedings of the 31st HERDSA Annual Conference

A2 - Barrow, Mark

A2 - Sutherland, Katheryn

PB - HERDSA

CY - New Zealand

T2 - 2008 HERDSA Annual Conference Engaging Communities

Y2 - 1 July 2008 through 4 July 2008

ER -

Doing Group Assessment: A Web Based Resource of Good Practice Case Studies

Abstract

Conference

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this