Domination and networks

A response to Nathaniel Tkacz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Commons-based peer production projects such as free software communities or Wikipedia represent a really existing example of a fairer way of allocating resources and resolving conflicts. They have accordingly generated high interest in issues of ‘governance’. Nathaniel Tkacz argues that Actor-Network-Theory’s Foucault-inspired reading of power as a distributed phenomenon represents an appropriate way to map and contest power asymmetries both in peer projects and in wider society (the ‘status quo’). In contrast to Tkacz, I argue that a networked conception of power fails to account for how domination is reproduced over time or for people’s inner sense of justice. I suggest some ways in which organisation studies can contribute to a better understanding of power in anti-authoritarian groups, and conclude by outlining in what way peer production governance can be said to constitute a credible alternative.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Peer Production
Issue number0
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

domination
sense of justice
governance
Wikipedia
asymmetry
resources
community
Group

Cite this

@article{45a6267453fe4bb6b23f1c02223ef563,
title = "Domination and networks: A response to Nathaniel Tkacz",
abstract = "Commons-based peer production projects such as free software communities or Wikipedia represent a really existing example of a fairer way of allocating resources and resolving conflicts. They have accordingly generated high interest in issues of ‘governance’. Nathaniel Tkacz argues that Actor-Network-Theory’s Foucault-inspired reading of power as a distributed phenomenon represents an appropriate way to map and contest power asymmetries both in peer projects and in wider society (the ‘status quo’). In contrast to Tkacz, I argue that a networked conception of power fails to account for how domination is reproduced over time or for people’s inner sense of justice. I suggest some ways in which organisation studies can contribute to a better understanding of power in anti-authoritarian groups, and conclude by outlining in what way peer production governance can be said to constitute a credible alternative.",
author = "Mathieu O'NEIL",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
language = "English",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Journal of Peer Production",
issn = "2213-5316",
number = "0",

}

Domination and networks : A response to Nathaniel Tkacz. / O'NEIL, Mathieu.

In: Journal of Peer Production, No. 0, 07.2011, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Domination and networks

T2 - A response to Nathaniel Tkacz

AU - O'NEIL, Mathieu

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - Commons-based peer production projects such as free software communities or Wikipedia represent a really existing example of a fairer way of allocating resources and resolving conflicts. They have accordingly generated high interest in issues of ‘governance’. Nathaniel Tkacz argues that Actor-Network-Theory’s Foucault-inspired reading of power as a distributed phenomenon represents an appropriate way to map and contest power asymmetries both in peer projects and in wider society (the ‘status quo’). In contrast to Tkacz, I argue that a networked conception of power fails to account for how domination is reproduced over time or for people’s inner sense of justice. I suggest some ways in which organisation studies can contribute to a better understanding of power in anti-authoritarian groups, and conclude by outlining in what way peer production governance can be said to constitute a credible alternative.

AB - Commons-based peer production projects such as free software communities or Wikipedia represent a really existing example of a fairer way of allocating resources and resolving conflicts. They have accordingly generated high interest in issues of ‘governance’. Nathaniel Tkacz argues that Actor-Network-Theory’s Foucault-inspired reading of power as a distributed phenomenon represents an appropriate way to map and contest power asymmetries both in peer projects and in wider society (the ‘status quo’). In contrast to Tkacz, I argue that a networked conception of power fails to account for how domination is reproduced over time or for people’s inner sense of justice. I suggest some ways in which organisation studies can contribute to a better understanding of power in anti-authoritarian groups, and conclude by outlining in what way peer production governance can be said to constitute a credible alternative.

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Journal of Peer Production

JF - Journal of Peer Production

SN - 2213-5316

IS - 0

ER -