Donor gametes and embryos

Who wants to know what about whom, and why?

Pia Broderick, Iain Walker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many treatments for infertility require the use of donated gametes or embryos. Arguments have been made that all parties involved (donors, recipients, and children) should have open access to information about one another. The present article reports a survey of attitudes of 77 donors and 327 recipients in the state of Western Australia. Donors and recipients endorsed a register of nonidentifying information, but were less keen on a register of identifying information. They believed that medical personnel should have access to such registers, and that donors and recipients (but not children) should have access to nonidentifying, but not identifying, information. Typically, the sort of information respondents wanted to access pertained to health status and physical characteristics. Overwhelmingly, both donors and recipients saw gamete and embryo donation as more like blood donation than like adoption.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-42
Number of pages14
JournalPolitics and the Life Sciences
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

embryo
recipient
donation
open access
health status
personnel

Cite this

@article{03b9fb4c5ac44423a16d8b365ac3d06e,
title = "Donor gametes and embryos: Who wants to know what about whom, and why?",
abstract = "Many treatments for infertility require the use of donated gametes or embryos. Arguments have been made that all parties involved (donors, recipients, and children) should have open access to information about one another. The present article reports a survey of attitudes of 77 donors and 327 recipients in the state of Western Australia. Donors and recipients endorsed a register of nonidentifying information, but were less keen on a register of identifying information. They believed that medical personnel should have access to such registers, and that donors and recipients (but not children) should have access to nonidentifying, but not identifying, information. Typically, the sort of information respondents wanted to access pertained to health status and physical characteristics. Overwhelmingly, both donors and recipients saw gamete and embryo donation as more like blood donation than like adoption.",
author = "Pia Broderick and Iain Walker",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1017/S0730938400005165",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "29--42",
journal = "Politics and the Life Sciences",
issn = "0730-9384",
publisher = "Association for Politics and the Life Sciences",
number = "1",

}

Donor gametes and embryos : Who wants to know what about whom, and why? / Broderick, Pia; Walker, Iain.

In: Politics and the Life Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2001, p. 29-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Donor gametes and embryos

T2 - Who wants to know what about whom, and why?

AU - Broderick, Pia

AU - Walker, Iain

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Many treatments for infertility require the use of donated gametes or embryos. Arguments have been made that all parties involved (donors, recipients, and children) should have open access to information about one another. The present article reports a survey of attitudes of 77 donors and 327 recipients in the state of Western Australia. Donors and recipients endorsed a register of nonidentifying information, but were less keen on a register of identifying information. They believed that medical personnel should have access to such registers, and that donors and recipients (but not children) should have access to nonidentifying, but not identifying, information. Typically, the sort of information respondents wanted to access pertained to health status and physical characteristics. Overwhelmingly, both donors and recipients saw gamete and embryo donation as more like blood donation than like adoption.

AB - Many treatments for infertility require the use of donated gametes or embryos. Arguments have been made that all parties involved (donors, recipients, and children) should have open access to information about one another. The present article reports a survey of attitudes of 77 donors and 327 recipients in the state of Western Australia. Donors and recipients endorsed a register of nonidentifying information, but were less keen on a register of identifying information. They believed that medical personnel should have access to such registers, and that donors and recipients (but not children) should have access to nonidentifying, but not identifying, information. Typically, the sort of information respondents wanted to access pertained to health status and physical characteristics. Overwhelmingly, both donors and recipients saw gamete and embryo donation as more like blood donation than like adoption.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18044389919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0730938400005165

DO - 10.1017/S0730938400005165

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 29

EP - 42

JO - Politics and the Life Sciences

JF - Politics and the Life Sciences

SN - 0730-9384

IS - 1

ER -