Abstract
The mainstream scholarship that seeks to explain China’s
urban development tends to favour a macro discourse that focuses on
institutional factors, such as globalisation, economic growth, and national policy
reforms. These are important contributing factors, but they do not necessarily
suffice to capture the complexities and interrelations of the immense magnitude
of China’s urban development. In this article, I approach the endogenous factors
to explain China’s urban development through the lenses of urbanisation and
property development. I posit a dichotomy of institutional drivers and noninstitutional
drivers. I argue that the dichotomy of institutional and noninstitutional
drivers provides an integrated framework to explain China’s urban
development, and fills the gap of missing non-institutional drivers in the
mainstream scholarship. Discussions through this dichotomy reflect progress,
identify problems and suggest further research agendas for both institutional and
non-institutional drivers.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 156-180 |
Number of pages | 25 |
Journal | Australasian Journal of Regional Studies |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |