Drought triggers and declarations: science and policy considerations for drought risk management

Linda Botterill, Michael Hayes

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    50 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper explores the value of triggers and declarations in the management of drought, bringing together two disciplinary perspectives, those of the public policy scholar and the climate scientist. These two perspectives highlight the complexity of the development and use of triggers in drought risk management by drawing on the experience of the United States, which has the most sophisticated system of drought triggers in the world, and that of Australia that has the most developed and longest standing national drought policy based on principles of risk management. The paper explores the advantages and disadvantages of triggers in managing drought, concluding that triggers are useful risk management tools at the individual level but become problematic and can lead to perverse outcomes when linked to some forms of government support programs
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)139-151
    Number of pages13
    JournalNatural Hazards
    Volume64
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Drought triggers and declarations: science and policy considerations for drought risk management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this