Dynamic and static footprints

Comparative calculations for angle and base of gait

Sarah A. Curran, Dominic Upton, Ian D. Learmonth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Information derived from footprint data serves as a useful, reliable and objective component to the assessment of patients with musculoskeletal pathology. Common spatial parameters extrapolated from such data include the angle and base of gait. Previous research has described a reliable method for analysing dynamic footprint data. While this data remains fundamental, few studies, if any have documented the comparisons of dynamic and static footprints. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the differences between the angle and base of gait from dynamic and static footprint data. Twenty-five subjects provided three dynamic (mid-gait analysis) and three static footprints. Intra-rater reliability of the measurement technique for both the angle and base of gait was found to be excellent (p > 0.001) for each of the two conditions (dynamic and static). Comparisons between the dynamic and static condition revealed no significant differences (p < 0.0001) for the angle of gait, whilst significant differences were noted between the static and dynamic condition for the base of gait. Further analysis using linear regression identified that the angle of gait for the left and right foot predicted a 67 and 60% of that of a dynamic situation; a slightly lower prediction of 54% was noted for base of gait. These results suggest that static footprints do demonstrate some prediction of dynamic function when assessing the angle and base of gait in normal subjects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)40-46
Number of pages7
JournalFoot
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gait
Foot
Linear Models
Pathology
Research

Cite this

Curran, Sarah A. ; Upton, Dominic ; Learmonth, Ian D. / Dynamic and static footprints : Comparative calculations for angle and base of gait. In: Foot. 2005 ; Vol. 15, No. 1. pp. 40-46.
@article{78ef8f55e8f34f42b3dad1d44b6c0695,
title = "Dynamic and static footprints: Comparative calculations for angle and base of gait",
abstract = "Information derived from footprint data serves as a useful, reliable and objective component to the assessment of patients with musculoskeletal pathology. Common spatial parameters extrapolated from such data include the angle and base of gait. Previous research has described a reliable method for analysing dynamic footprint data. While this data remains fundamental, few studies, if any have documented the comparisons of dynamic and static footprints. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the differences between the angle and base of gait from dynamic and static footprint data. Twenty-five subjects provided three dynamic (mid-gait analysis) and three static footprints. Intra-rater reliability of the measurement technique for both the angle and base of gait was found to be excellent (p > 0.001) for each of the two conditions (dynamic and static). Comparisons between the dynamic and static condition revealed no significant differences (p < 0.0001) for the angle of gait, whilst significant differences were noted between the static and dynamic condition for the base of gait. Further analysis using linear regression identified that the angle of gait for the left and right foot predicted a 67 and 60{\%} of that of a dynamic situation; a slightly lower prediction of 54{\%} was noted for base of gait. These results suggest that static footprints do demonstrate some prediction of dynamic function when assessing the angle and base of gait in normal subjects.",
keywords = "Angle, Base, Dynamic, Footprint, Gait, Static",
author = "Curran, {Sarah A.} and Dominic Upton and Learmonth, {Ian D.}",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.foot.2004.12.004",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "40--46",
journal = "Foot",
issn = "0958-2592",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "1",

}

Dynamic and static footprints : Comparative calculations for angle and base of gait. / Curran, Sarah A.; Upton, Dominic; Learmonth, Ian D.

In: Foot, Vol. 15, No. 1, 03.2005, p. 40-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dynamic and static footprints

T2 - Comparative calculations for angle and base of gait

AU - Curran, Sarah A.

AU - Upton, Dominic

AU - Learmonth, Ian D.

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - Information derived from footprint data serves as a useful, reliable and objective component to the assessment of patients with musculoskeletal pathology. Common spatial parameters extrapolated from such data include the angle and base of gait. Previous research has described a reliable method for analysing dynamic footprint data. While this data remains fundamental, few studies, if any have documented the comparisons of dynamic and static footprints. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the differences between the angle and base of gait from dynamic and static footprint data. Twenty-five subjects provided three dynamic (mid-gait analysis) and three static footprints. Intra-rater reliability of the measurement technique for both the angle and base of gait was found to be excellent (p > 0.001) for each of the two conditions (dynamic and static). Comparisons between the dynamic and static condition revealed no significant differences (p < 0.0001) for the angle of gait, whilst significant differences were noted between the static and dynamic condition for the base of gait. Further analysis using linear regression identified that the angle of gait for the left and right foot predicted a 67 and 60% of that of a dynamic situation; a slightly lower prediction of 54% was noted for base of gait. These results suggest that static footprints do demonstrate some prediction of dynamic function when assessing the angle and base of gait in normal subjects.

AB - Information derived from footprint data serves as a useful, reliable and objective component to the assessment of patients with musculoskeletal pathology. Common spatial parameters extrapolated from such data include the angle and base of gait. Previous research has described a reliable method for analysing dynamic footprint data. While this data remains fundamental, few studies, if any have documented the comparisons of dynamic and static footprints. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the differences between the angle and base of gait from dynamic and static footprint data. Twenty-five subjects provided three dynamic (mid-gait analysis) and three static footprints. Intra-rater reliability of the measurement technique for both the angle and base of gait was found to be excellent (p > 0.001) for each of the two conditions (dynamic and static). Comparisons between the dynamic and static condition revealed no significant differences (p < 0.0001) for the angle of gait, whilst significant differences were noted between the static and dynamic condition for the base of gait. Further analysis using linear regression identified that the angle of gait for the left and right foot predicted a 67 and 60% of that of a dynamic situation; a slightly lower prediction of 54% was noted for base of gait. These results suggest that static footprints do demonstrate some prediction of dynamic function when assessing the angle and base of gait in normal subjects.

KW - Angle

KW - Base

KW - Dynamic

KW - Footprint

KW - Gait

KW - Static

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14244249666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.foot.2004.12.004

DO - 10.1016/j.foot.2004.12.004

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 40

EP - 46

JO - Foot

JF - Foot

SN - 0958-2592

IS - 1

ER -