Early MRI versus conventional management in the detection of occult scaphoid fractures: what does it really cost? A rural pilot study

Tamika Kelson, Robert Davidson, Tim Baker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: To compare the cost-effectiveness and patient impact between acute magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) management and conventional management in the diagnosis of occult scaphoid fractures in a rural setting. Methods: Consecutive patients presenting to a rural emergency department (ED) with a suspected scaphoid fracture were randomly assigned to either conventional management (6) or acute MRI management (10) (3 patients were excluded from the study analysis). All healthcare costs were compared between the two management groups and potential impacts on the patients’ pain, mobility and lifestyle were also measured. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups at baseline. There was one (10%) scaphoid fracture in the MRI group and none in the conventional group (P = 0.42). A larger proportion of other fractures were diagnosed in the MRI group (20% (2) vs. 16.7% (1), P = 0.87), as well as less clinic attendances (1 (0–2.25) vs. 4 (2.25–5)) and diagnostic services (1 (1–1.25) vs. 2 (1–3)). Median management costs were $485.05 (AUD) (MRI) and $486.90 (AUD) (conventional). The MRI group had better pain and satisfaction scores as well as less time of immobilisation, treatment and time off work. Conclusion: MRI dramatically reduces the amount of unnecessary immobilisation, time of treatment and healthcare usage in a rural setting. The two protocols are suggested to be equivalent financially. When potential societal costs, the amount of unnecessary immobilisation, low prevalence of true fractures and patient satisfaction are considered, acute MRI should be the management technique of choice. Further studies are still required to assess the best method for managing bone bruise within the scaphoid.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-16
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Volume63
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Closed Fractures
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Costs and Cost Analysis
Immobilization
Diagnostic Services
Pain
Contusions
Patient Satisfaction
Health Care Costs
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Life Style
Hospital Emergency Service
Delivery of Health Care
Bone and Bones

Cite this

@article{234e91a4d1654b52aa581ce64bd2d84c,
title = "Early MRI versus conventional management in the detection of occult scaphoid fractures: what does it really cost? A rural pilot study",
abstract = "Introduction: To compare the cost-effectiveness and patient impact between acute magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) management and conventional management in the diagnosis of occult scaphoid fractures in a rural setting. Methods: Consecutive patients presenting to a rural emergency department (ED) with a suspected scaphoid fracture were randomly assigned to either conventional management (6) or acute MRI management (10) (3 patients were excluded from the study analysis). All healthcare costs were compared between the two management groups and potential impacts on the patients’ pain, mobility and lifestyle were also measured. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups at baseline. There was one (10{\%}) scaphoid fracture in the MRI group and none in the conventional group (P = 0.42). A larger proportion of other fractures were diagnosed in the MRI group (20{\%} (2) vs. 16.7{\%} (1), P = 0.87), as well as less clinic attendances (1 (0–2.25) vs. 4 (2.25–5)) and diagnostic services (1 (1–1.25) vs. 2 (1–3)). Median management costs were $485.05 (AUD) (MRI) and $486.90 (AUD) (conventional). The MRI group had better pain and satisfaction scores as well as less time of immobilisation, treatment and time off work. Conclusion: MRI dramatically reduces the amount of unnecessary immobilisation, time of treatment and healthcare usage in a rural setting. The two protocols are suggested to be equivalent financially. When potential societal costs, the amount of unnecessary immobilisation, low prevalence of true fractures and patient satisfaction are considered, acute MRI should be the management technique of choice. Further studies are still required to assess the best method for managing bone bruise within the scaphoid.",
keywords = "Cost, MRI, fracture, management, scaphoid",
author = "Tamika Kelson and Robert Davidson and Tim Baker",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1002/jmrs.153",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "9--16",
journal = "The Radiographer",
issn = "1170-9758",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Early MRI versus conventional management in the detection of occult scaphoid fractures: what does it really cost? A rural pilot study

AU - Kelson, Tamika

AU - Davidson, Robert

AU - Baker, Tim

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Introduction: To compare the cost-effectiveness and patient impact between acute magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) management and conventional management in the diagnosis of occult scaphoid fractures in a rural setting. Methods: Consecutive patients presenting to a rural emergency department (ED) with a suspected scaphoid fracture were randomly assigned to either conventional management (6) or acute MRI management (10) (3 patients were excluded from the study analysis). All healthcare costs were compared between the two management groups and potential impacts on the patients’ pain, mobility and lifestyle were also measured. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups at baseline. There was one (10%) scaphoid fracture in the MRI group and none in the conventional group (P = 0.42). A larger proportion of other fractures were diagnosed in the MRI group (20% (2) vs. 16.7% (1), P = 0.87), as well as less clinic attendances (1 (0–2.25) vs. 4 (2.25–5)) and diagnostic services (1 (1–1.25) vs. 2 (1–3)). Median management costs were $485.05 (AUD) (MRI) and $486.90 (AUD) (conventional). The MRI group had better pain and satisfaction scores as well as less time of immobilisation, treatment and time off work. Conclusion: MRI dramatically reduces the amount of unnecessary immobilisation, time of treatment and healthcare usage in a rural setting. The two protocols are suggested to be equivalent financially. When potential societal costs, the amount of unnecessary immobilisation, low prevalence of true fractures and patient satisfaction are considered, acute MRI should be the management technique of choice. Further studies are still required to assess the best method for managing bone bruise within the scaphoid.

AB - Introduction: To compare the cost-effectiveness and patient impact between acute magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) management and conventional management in the diagnosis of occult scaphoid fractures in a rural setting. Methods: Consecutive patients presenting to a rural emergency department (ED) with a suspected scaphoid fracture were randomly assigned to either conventional management (6) or acute MRI management (10) (3 patients were excluded from the study analysis). All healthcare costs were compared between the two management groups and potential impacts on the patients’ pain, mobility and lifestyle were also measured. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups at baseline. There was one (10%) scaphoid fracture in the MRI group and none in the conventional group (P = 0.42). A larger proportion of other fractures were diagnosed in the MRI group (20% (2) vs. 16.7% (1), P = 0.87), as well as less clinic attendances (1 (0–2.25) vs. 4 (2.25–5)) and diagnostic services (1 (1–1.25) vs. 2 (1–3)). Median management costs were $485.05 (AUD) (MRI) and $486.90 (AUD) (conventional). The MRI group had better pain and satisfaction scores as well as less time of immobilisation, treatment and time off work. Conclusion: MRI dramatically reduces the amount of unnecessary immobilisation, time of treatment and healthcare usage in a rural setting. The two protocols are suggested to be equivalent financially. When potential societal costs, the amount of unnecessary immobilisation, low prevalence of true fractures and patient satisfaction are considered, acute MRI should be the management technique of choice. Further studies are still required to assess the best method for managing bone bruise within the scaphoid.

KW - Cost

KW - MRI

KW - fracture

KW - management

KW - scaphoid

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006172909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/early-mri-versus-conventional-management-detection-occult-scaphoid-fractures-it-really-cost-rural-pi-1

U2 - 10.1002/jmrs.153

DO - 10.1002/jmrs.153

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 9

EP - 16

JO - The Radiographer

JF - The Radiographer

SN - 1170-9758

IS - 1

ER -