Ecological boundary detection using Carlin-Chib Bayesian model selection

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Sharp ecological transitions in space (ecotones, edges, boundaries) often are where ecologically important events occur, such as elevated or reduced biodiversity or altered ecological functions (e.g. changes in productivity, pollination rates or parasitism loads, nesting success). While human observers often identify these transitions by using intuitive or gestalt assignments (e.g. the boundary between a remnant woodland patch and the surrounding farm paddock seems obvious), it is clearly desirable to make statistical assessments based on measurements. These assessments often are straightforward to make if the data are univariate, but identifying boundaries or transitions using compositional or multivariate data sets is more difficult. There is a need for an intermediate step in which pairwise similarities between points or temporal samples are computed. Here, I describe an approach that treats points along a transect as alternative hypotheses (models) about the location of the boundary. Carlin and Chib (1995) introduced a Bayesian technique for comparing non-hierarchical models, which I adapted to compute the probabilities of each boundary location (i.e. a model) relative to the ensemble of models constituting the set of possible points of the boundary along the transect. Several artificial data sets and two field data sets (on vegetation and soils and on cave-dwelling invertebrates and microclimates) are used to illustrate the approach. The method can be extended to cases in with several boundaries along a gradient, such as where there is an ecotone of non-zero thickness.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)499-508
    Number of pages10
    JournalDiversity and Distributions
    Volume11
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2005

    Fingerprint

    ecotones
    ecotone
    ecological function
    microclimate
    caves
    transect
    woodlands
    pollination
    parasitism
    invertebrates
    nesting success
    pastures
    biodiversity
    farms
    vegetation
    detection
    cave
    methodology
    woodland
    invertebrate

    Cite this

    @article{2b388bcf6cf44d149f3bab546513e35b,
    title = "Ecological boundary detection using Carlin-Chib Bayesian model selection",
    abstract = "Sharp ecological transitions in space (ecotones, edges, boundaries) often are where ecologically important events occur, such as elevated or reduced biodiversity or altered ecological functions (e.g. changes in productivity, pollination rates or parasitism loads, nesting success). While human observers often identify these transitions by using intuitive or gestalt assignments (e.g. the boundary between a remnant woodland patch and the surrounding farm paddock seems obvious), it is clearly desirable to make statistical assessments based on measurements. These assessments often are straightforward to make if the data are univariate, but identifying boundaries or transitions using compositional or multivariate data sets is more difficult. There is a need for an intermediate step in which pairwise similarities between points or temporal samples are computed. Here, I describe an approach that treats points along a transect as alternative hypotheses (models) about the location of the boundary. Carlin and Chib (1995) introduced a Bayesian technique for comparing non-hierarchical models, which I adapted to compute the probabilities of each boundary location (i.e. a model) relative to the ensemble of models constituting the set of possible points of the boundary along the transect. Several artificial data sets and two field data sets (on vegetation and soils and on cave-dwelling invertebrates and microclimates) are used to illustrate the approach. The method can be extended to cases in with several boundaries along a gradient, such as where there is an ecotone of non-zero thickness.",
    author = "{Mac Nally}, R.",
    note = "Cited By :4 Export Date: 6 June 2017",
    year = "2005",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00187.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "11",
    pages = "499--508",
    journal = "Diversity and Distributions",
    issn = "1366-9516",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "6",

    }

    Ecological boundary detection using Carlin-Chib Bayesian model selection. / Mac Nally, R.

    In: Diversity and Distributions, Vol. 11, No. 6, 2005, p. 499-508.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Ecological boundary detection using Carlin-Chib Bayesian model selection

    AU - Mac Nally, R.

    N1 - Cited By :4 Export Date: 6 June 2017

    PY - 2005

    Y1 - 2005

    N2 - Sharp ecological transitions in space (ecotones, edges, boundaries) often are where ecologically important events occur, such as elevated or reduced biodiversity or altered ecological functions (e.g. changes in productivity, pollination rates or parasitism loads, nesting success). While human observers often identify these transitions by using intuitive or gestalt assignments (e.g. the boundary between a remnant woodland patch and the surrounding farm paddock seems obvious), it is clearly desirable to make statistical assessments based on measurements. These assessments often are straightforward to make if the data are univariate, but identifying boundaries or transitions using compositional or multivariate data sets is more difficult. There is a need for an intermediate step in which pairwise similarities between points or temporal samples are computed. Here, I describe an approach that treats points along a transect as alternative hypotheses (models) about the location of the boundary. Carlin and Chib (1995) introduced a Bayesian technique for comparing non-hierarchical models, which I adapted to compute the probabilities of each boundary location (i.e. a model) relative to the ensemble of models constituting the set of possible points of the boundary along the transect. Several artificial data sets and two field data sets (on vegetation and soils and on cave-dwelling invertebrates and microclimates) are used to illustrate the approach. The method can be extended to cases in with several boundaries along a gradient, such as where there is an ecotone of non-zero thickness.

    AB - Sharp ecological transitions in space (ecotones, edges, boundaries) often are where ecologically important events occur, such as elevated or reduced biodiversity or altered ecological functions (e.g. changes in productivity, pollination rates or parasitism loads, nesting success). While human observers often identify these transitions by using intuitive or gestalt assignments (e.g. the boundary between a remnant woodland patch and the surrounding farm paddock seems obvious), it is clearly desirable to make statistical assessments based on measurements. These assessments often are straightforward to make if the data are univariate, but identifying boundaries or transitions using compositional or multivariate data sets is more difficult. There is a need for an intermediate step in which pairwise similarities between points or temporal samples are computed. Here, I describe an approach that treats points along a transect as alternative hypotheses (models) about the location of the boundary. Carlin and Chib (1995) introduced a Bayesian technique for comparing non-hierarchical models, which I adapted to compute the probabilities of each boundary location (i.e. a model) relative to the ensemble of models constituting the set of possible points of the boundary along the transect. Several artificial data sets and two field data sets (on vegetation and soils and on cave-dwelling invertebrates and microclimates) are used to illustrate the approach. The method can be extended to cases in with several boundaries along a gradient, such as where there is an ecotone of non-zero thickness.

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00187.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00187.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 11

    SP - 499

    EP - 508

    JO - Diversity and Distributions

    JF - Diversity and Distributions

    SN - 1366-9516

    IS - 6

    ER -