Ecological reflexivity: characterising an elusive virtue for governance in the Anthropocene

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reflexivity – the capacity of an agent, structure or process to change in the light of reflection on its performance – has attracted widespread support among political theorists as a virtue for environmental governance. Dryzek argues that a distinctively ecological form of reflexivity becomes crucial for governing in the Anthropocene. But there remains a need to clarify the conceptual scope of ecological reflexivity and to ascertain whether it has distinctive analytical value. A new conceptual framework for ecological reflexivity is outlined, comprising three components: recognition, rethinking and response. Through a comparative analysis of reflexivity and four related concepts – adaptive and transformative governance, experimental governance, social learning and anticipatory governance – ecological reflexivity is shown to be especially well equipped to take account of political contestation over the nature and direction of change required to respond to ecological risks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1145-1166
Number of pages22
JournalEnvironmental Politics
Volume28
Issue number7
Early online date22 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

reflexivity
conceptual framework
learning
governance
social learning
Anthropocene
analysis
performance
Values

Cite this

@article{a66e62426ab542808daee7948d326831,
title = "Ecological reflexivity: characterising an elusive virtue for governance in the Anthropocene",
abstract = "Reflexivity – the capacity of an agent, structure or process to change in the light of reflection on its performance – has attracted widespread support among political theorists as a virtue for environmental governance. Dryzek argues that a distinctively ecological form of reflexivity becomes crucial for governing in the Anthropocene. But there remains a need to clarify the conceptual scope of ecological reflexivity and to ascertain whether it has distinctive analytical value. A new conceptual framework for ecological reflexivity is outlined, comprising three components: recognition, rethinking and response. Through a comparative analysis of reflexivity and four related concepts – adaptive and transformative governance, experimental governance, social learning and anticipatory governance – ecological reflexivity is shown to be especially well equipped to take account of political contestation over the nature and direction of change required to respond to ecological risks.",
keywords = "Reflexivity, ecological reflexivity, reflexive governance, environmental governance, Anthropocene, adaptive governance",
author = "Jonathan Pickering",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1080/09644016.2018.1487148",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1145--1166",
journal = "Environmental Politics",
issn = "0964-4016",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "7",

}

Ecological reflexivity: characterising an elusive virtue for governance in the Anthropocene. / Pickering, Jonathan.

In: Environmental Politics, Vol. 28, No. 7, 10.11.2019, p. 1145-1166.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ecological reflexivity: characterising an elusive virtue for governance in the Anthropocene

AU - Pickering, Jonathan

PY - 2019/11/10

Y1 - 2019/11/10

N2 - Reflexivity – the capacity of an agent, structure or process to change in the light of reflection on its performance – has attracted widespread support among political theorists as a virtue for environmental governance. Dryzek argues that a distinctively ecological form of reflexivity becomes crucial for governing in the Anthropocene. But there remains a need to clarify the conceptual scope of ecological reflexivity and to ascertain whether it has distinctive analytical value. A new conceptual framework for ecological reflexivity is outlined, comprising three components: recognition, rethinking and response. Through a comparative analysis of reflexivity and four related concepts – adaptive and transformative governance, experimental governance, social learning and anticipatory governance – ecological reflexivity is shown to be especially well equipped to take account of political contestation over the nature and direction of change required to respond to ecological risks.

AB - Reflexivity – the capacity of an agent, structure or process to change in the light of reflection on its performance – has attracted widespread support among political theorists as a virtue for environmental governance. Dryzek argues that a distinctively ecological form of reflexivity becomes crucial for governing in the Anthropocene. But there remains a need to clarify the conceptual scope of ecological reflexivity and to ascertain whether it has distinctive analytical value. A new conceptual framework for ecological reflexivity is outlined, comprising three components: recognition, rethinking and response. Through a comparative analysis of reflexivity and four related concepts – adaptive and transformative governance, experimental governance, social learning and anticipatory governance – ecological reflexivity is shown to be especially well equipped to take account of political contestation over the nature and direction of change required to respond to ecological risks.

KW - Reflexivity

KW - ecological reflexivity

KW - reflexive governance

KW - environmental governance

KW - Anthropocene

KW - adaptive governance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048789553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09644016.2018.1487148

DO - 10.1080/09644016.2018.1487148

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 1145

EP - 1166

JO - Environmental Politics

JF - Environmental Politics

SN - 0964-4016

IS - 7

ER -